• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

My proposal to rename Gipsy Hill station

Sad Sprinter

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2017
Messages
1,830
Location
Way on down South London town
A semi-serious proposal...alright I am being serious. I propose that Gipsy Hill station should be renamed "Norwood Hills", to reflect the other nearby hilly communities across the Norwood Ridge like Central Hill and Beulah Hill, the latter of which is a remote area quite unconnected from public transport. Gipsy Hill is only the minor of the many hills in the area. "Norwood Hills" will help to be more inclusive of the wide area of which Gipsy Hill station, already, acts as somewhat of a railhead anyway.

Of course, the problem would be Norwood Hills sounds a bit too much like Northwood Hills, how many people will find this a problem I'm not sure. I already know at least one person who made the unfortunate mistake of mixing up Forest Hill and Forest Gate...
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

randyrippley

Established Member
Joined
21 Feb 2016
Messages
5,151
Are you sure this isn't a estate agent's attempt to move the area upmarket?
 

Wolfie

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2010
Messages
6,193
A semi-serious proposal...alright I am being serious. I propose that Gipsy Hill station should be renamed "Norwood Hills", to reflect the other nearby hilly communities across the Norwood Ridge like Central Hill and Beulah Hill, the latter of which is a remote area quite unconnected from public transport. Gipsy Hill is only the minor of the many hills in the area. "Norwood Hills" will help to be more inclusive of the wide area of which Gipsy Hill station, already, acts as somewhat of a railhead anyway.

Of course, the problem would be Norwood Hills sounds a bit too much like Northwood Hills, how many people will find this a problem I'm not sure. I already know at least one person who made the unfortunate mistake of mixing up Forest Hill and Forest Gate...
Frankly comes over as change for the sake of it. The current name has worked well enough for a bloody long time.
 

Sad Sprinter

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2017
Messages
1,830
Location
Way on down South London town
Are you sure this isn't a estate agent's attempt to move the area upmarket?

I assure you I am but a humble train enthusiast. Besides, every station along the Outer South London Line already has that "edgy-trendy" vibe to it. For some reason the areas along the main line via Norbury has not had the same treatment.
 

WizCastro197

Established Member
Joined
12 May 2022
Messages
1,454
Location
Reigate
I'm confused what the issue is with the current name. Is there something wrong with it? Considering the station is located on Gispy Hill, I don't think it could be better named.
 

Sad Sprinter

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2017
Messages
1,830
Location
Way on down South London town
Given that, and the fact that no change is cost free, that is a hard no then.

Well if you don't like that proposal, I have plenty other station rename ideas you might enjoy.

I'm confused what the issue is with the current name. Is there something wrong with it? Considering the station is located on Gispy Hill, I don't think it could be better named.

Well I have an interest in what's called the Norwood Ridge, which is the steep hilly outcrop in the centre of South London. The ridge itself is made of a succession of hills, some large like Beulah Hill and some small like Gipsy Hill - or even Bedford Hill in Balham which is one of the smallest. Given the the geography of the ridge means that a large sprawl of housing becomes quite unconnected from railways, I identified Gipsy Hill, being largely the middlemost station of the ridge - ripe for a name change in order to draw the other communities slightly closer together. Making areas along the Central Hill/Beulah Hill corridors psychologically closer to railway.

I remember recently using a mapping tool designed by TFL which overlays a colour gradient scale over London which displays the distance from a railway station as a colour ranging from red (very near) or light blue (very remote) unsurprisingly, Beulah and Central Hills were all light blue. Naming Gipsy Hill won't change the physical location of the railway, but it might make the railway "feel" closer. It's no different than giving a station an "& X" suffix to group another settlement in with the station's catchment area.

So perhaps I've sold myself short to the other poster, it's not change for the sake of it, but a relatively cheap way of trying to improve transport in Middle South London.
 
Last edited:

Wolfie

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2010
Messages
6,193
Well if you don't like that proposal, I have plenty other station rename ideas you might enjoy.



Well I have an interest in what's called the Norwood Ridge, which is the steep hilly outcrop in the centre of South London. The ridge itself is made of a succession of hills, some large like Beulah Hill and some small like Gipsy Hill - or even Bedford Hill in Balham which is one of the smallest. Given the the geography of the ridge means that a large sprawl of housing becomes quite unconnected from railways, I identified Gipsy Hill, being largely the middlemost station of the ridge - ripe for a name change in order to draw the other communities slightly closer together. Making areas along the Central Hill/Beulah Hill corridors psychologically closer to railway.

I remember recently using a mapping tool designed by TFL which overlays a colour gradient scale over London which displays the distance from a railway station as a colour ranging from red (very near) or light blue (very remote) unsurprisingly, Beulah and Central Hills were all light blue. Naming Gipsy Hill won't change the physical location of the railway, but it might make the railway "feel" closer. It's no different than giving a station an "& X" suffix to group another settlement in with the station's catchment area.

So perhaps I've sold myself short to the other poster, it's not change for the sake of it, but a relatively cheap way of trying to improve transport in Middle South London.
I'm now even more confused. Anyone who lives there knows where the station is. Anyone who wants to visit there will be pointed at the station by Google or other search tools. As such what does changing the name and nothing else actually achieve?
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,114
Location
Yorks
I think "Gipsy Hill" has a nice rustic quality to it. It makes me want to listen to my Steeleye Span lp's.
 

Turtle

Member
Joined
18 Mar 2013
Messages
299
Richer you are more likely you are to buy a better car and less likely you are to use the train. Talking very generally
Not so much in London though.
I went to school in the Beulah Hill area in the early 1950s, including the Great Smog. It was quite educational to notice how the 137 bus from Battersea was able to speed up in the clearer air as it climbed uphill after Streatham to the sunny uplands of Beulah Hill.
The more I think about it I'm surprised the estate agents haven't cottoned on to Norwood Hills à la Surrey Hills, although the latter term might be outdated now.
 

Sad Sprinter

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2017
Messages
1,830
Location
Way on down South London town
Not so much in London though.
I went to school in the Beulah Hill area in the early 1950s, including the Great Smog. It was quite educational to notice how the 137 bus from Battersea was able to speed up in the clearer air as it climbed uphill after Streatham to the sunny uplands of Beulah Hill.
The more I think about it I'm surprised the estate agents haven't cottoned on to Norwood Hills à la Surrey Hills, although the latter term might be outdated now.

Must of been interesting seeing the transmitters going up in that time
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,440
Location
Bristol
So perhaps I've sold myself short to the other poster, it's not change for the sake of it, but a relatively cheap way of trying to improve transport in Middle South London.
Believe potential name changes have been costed at £1m+ (there's a separate discussion as to why, and how to reduce it to something more sensible), so it's not *that* cheap.
 

Wolfie

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2010
Messages
6,193
Interesting. Who built the line passing through Gipsy Hill Station?
The attached says that "Opened as part of West End of London and Crystal Palace Railway LBSCR".
 

AlastairFraser

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2018
Messages
2,181
The attached says that "Opened as part of West End of London and Crystal Palace Railway LBSCR".
So I wonder why the great Southern? Was the LBSCR the biggest?
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,406
So I wonder why the great Southern? Was the LBSCR the biggest?
Asked the people who renamed it "Great Southern" about 15years ago, before that it was the "Gipsy Hill Tavern" which wasn't first name either.

Several LBSCR directors lived locally and have streets named after them e.g. Farquahar Road is named after an LBSCR FD.
The large parts of Gipsy Hill and Crystal Palace areas were developed by lots of the LBSCR directors in their spare time as well as the railway itself.
 

Top