We haven't had a specific thread on this recently (I found https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/blaenau-festiniog-slate-waste.83211/) but with the establishment of a flow from Llandudno Jct to Earles sidings in addition to one to Luton (https://stonespecialist.com/news/na...sh-slate-re-opens-llandudno-junction-railhead) I wonder whether a bit more investment might eliminate a lot more road traffic in N Wales?
The Earles flow should run until 2042 when they have to stop extracting limestone - but the cement works could continue by importing limestone too...
In which case would it be worth a) upgrading the Conwy valley branch and taking slate from closer to the railhead (or putting in conveyor belts to feed it as Cwt-y-Bugail quarries are quite a long way from Blaenau Ffestiniog) and b) putting stone which comes from Bethesda onto rail at Penmaenmawr if a loading point can't be established somewhere just east of Bangor?
We need to decarbonise whatever we can, making cement emits loads of CO2 but we shall continue to need concrete, so we should at least eliminate road transport of the raw materials wherever we can.
The Earles flow should run until 2042 when they have to stop extracting limestone - but the cement works could continue by importing limestone too...
In which case would it be worth a) upgrading the Conwy valley branch and taking slate from closer to the railhead (or putting in conveyor belts to feed it as Cwt-y-Bugail quarries are quite a long way from Blaenau Ffestiniog) and b) putting stone which comes from Bethesda onto rail at Penmaenmawr if a loading point can't be established somewhere just east of Bangor?
We need to decarbonise whatever we can, making cement emits loads of CO2 but we shall continue to need concrete, so we should at least eliminate road transport of the raw materials wherever we can.
Last edited: