• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

"Not via Doncaster" on a ticket from York to Hull

Status
Not open for further replies.

PM77

Member
Joined
14 Aug 2022
Messages
28
Location
York
I'm a little confused why certain tickets from York to Hull are shown as "not via Doncaster", when the route offered doesn't take you via Doncaster (York - Leeds, Leeds - Hull). I'm aware there are direct services, but not for the time I'm wanting to arrive.

These are anytime short/day return tickets.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
14,528
Offers a cheaper option than the route "Any Permitted" alternative and so precludes travelling via (changing at) Doncaster station and likely using "premium" LNER train services for all or part of the journey?
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
13,911
Location
UK
There are two routes of walk-up fares (Anytime/Off-Peak) between York and Hull: "Any Permitted" or "not via Doncaster". The "Any Permitted" allows you to use any of the permitted routes, which are:
  • via Doncaster, then via Goole or Selby to Hull (optionally you could go via Selby to reach Doncaster, and continue to Hull via Goole, but this would rarely make sense as it is so much slower and there are only around 10 Selby-Doncaster trains a day, several bunched together)
  • via Church Fenton or Harrogate to Leeds, then via Selby to Hull
  • via Sherburn-in-Elmet or direct to Selby, then direct to Hull
The "not via Doncaster" ticket allows you to take any of the above routes, other than those via Doncaster. It's cheaper because you aren't benefitting from the ability to use the "premium" East Coast Main Line between York and Doncaster.

Travelling via Leeds is perfectly valid with the "not via Doncaster" ticket, both because it's a permitted route and doesn't involve travelling via Doncaster (thus it fulfils the route restriction), and also because it is a route offered by a journey planner (which means it's contractually valid if you buy a ticket in conjunction with that itinerary).
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
20,524
Location
Airedale
The "not via Doncaster" ticket allows you to take any of the above routes, other than those via Doncaster. It's cheaper because you aren't benefitting from the ability to use the "premium" East Coast Main Line between York and Doncaster.
Historically, the York-Selby-Hull route was relatively infrequent and mostly involved a change at Selby. The Doncaster option was a very sensible route on frequency, "premium" or no.
 

mikeg

Established Member
Joined
20 Apr 2010
Messages
1,915
Location
Selby
Travelling via Leeds is perfectly valid with the "not via Doncaster" ticket, both because it's a permitted route and doesn't involve travelling via Doncaster (thus it fulfils the route restriction), and also because it is a route offered by a journey planner (which means it's contractually valid if you buy a ticket in conjunction with that itinerary).
And is a mapped route, or at least was last I checked, the doubleback between Micklefield and Leeds falling within the 'group stations rule'. This is a historically valid route in the original Routeing Guide, which makes significant sense for passengers travelling from Thirsk or perhaps Northallerton or Yarm, given the timings. They actually removed this route and it wasn't until I complained bitterly on the forum, TPE's customer services (they're the fare setter for Thirsk and Northallerton to Hull, or at least were at the time) and submitted freedom of information requests to Passenger Focus that it got fixed.

NB. York is the appropriate Routeing Point for Thirsk, so hence the York to Hull validity affects that of Thirsk to Hull.
 

PM77

Member
Joined
14 Aug 2022
Messages
28
Location
York
Thank you,

It's the crazy world of ticketing. The direct route is usually the quickest, TPE via Leeds is usually 2nd quickest, so why anyone would want to travel via Doncaster is a mystery. To be fair, both "modern" units in LNER and TPE have very similar "standard" seating in cattle class. I've not had the privilege of testing 1st Class that often.

I was a little perplexed to why this 2nd quickest route was shown as not viable, even though I wouldn't be going via Doncaster. Thankfully you've explained the mystery. Even though in reality it makes no sense.

I'll probably find a KX to Preston, but not via Penrith or Aberdeen somewhere
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
13,911
Location
UK
Thank you,

It's the crazy world of ticketing. The direct route is usually the quickest, TPE via Leeds is usually 2nd quickest, so why anyone would want to travel via Doncaster is a mystery. To be fair, both "modern" units in LNER and TPE have very similar "standard" seating in cattle class. I've not had the privilege of testing 1st Class that often.

I was a little perplexed to why this 2nd quickest route was shown as not viable, even though I wouldn't be going via Doncaster. Thankfully you've explained the mystery. Even though in reality it makes no sense.

I'll probably find a KX to Preston, but not via Penrith or Aberdeen somewhere
There are certainly some bizarre route restrictions out there. Many are statements of the obvious, for example Northallerton to Leeds, routed via York. What other route could you possibly take? The route via Ripon closed to passengers a mere 57 years ago...

These pointless routings have proliferated in recent years as there was an industry drive to "simplify" ticketing by "removing complex terms" such as Any Permitted. Of course, like most efforts at "simplifying" ticketing over the years, it didn't really achieve the stated aims.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
72,882
Location
Yorkshire
I'm a little confused why certain tickets from York to Hull are shown as "not via Doncaster", when the route offered doesn't take you via Doncaster
This is exactly why they are offered. ;)

Historically, the York-Selby-Hull route was relatively infrequent and mostly involved a change at Selby. The Doncaster option was a very sensible route on frequency, "premium" or no.
This is very true; it was also particularly the case that the first journey opportunity of the day would often be via Doncaster.

It's still true that on Sundays, travelling from Hull to stations on the northern ECML , some journey opportunities involve changing at Doncaster, e.g.:


14:53 - 17:24
Hull to Durham
1 change - Doncaster
2hrs 31mins

Thank you,

It's the crazy world of ticketing. The direct route is usually the quickest, TPE via Leeds is usually 2nd quickest, so why anyone would want to travel via Doncaster is a mystery.
Notwithstanding the lack of frequency a few years back, it's not that much of a mystery. Are you proposing that the permitted routes via Doncaster be abolished? If so, then this would result in people who use TOC websites not being able to obtain itineraries for what can be the quickest route at that moment in time. The forum's site would still offer such journeys, but only with a combination of tickets.

It's more an issue if travelling from stations in the Hull area that may not have a direct train to York, and then onwards to stations beyond York, e.g. Beverley to Durham:

1410 Beverley
1518 Doncaster

1611 Doncaster
1724 Durham
Avoiding Doncaster means two changes and not getting to Durham until 1754, in that example.
 
Last edited:

TUC

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2010
Messages
4,242
There are two routes of walk-up fares (Anytime/Off-Peak) between York and Hull: "Any Permitted" or "not via Doncaster". The "Any Permitted" allows you to use any of the permitted routes, which are:
  • via Doncaster, then via Goole or Selby to Hull (optionally you could go via Selby to reach Doncaster, and continue to Hull via Goole, but this would rarely make sense as it is so much slower and there are only around 10 Selby-Doncaster trains a day, several bunched together)
  • via Church Fenton or Harrogate to Leeds, then via Selby to Hull
  • via Sherburn-in-Elmet or direct to Selby, then direct to Hull
The "not via Doncaster" ticket allows you to take any of the above routes, other than those via Doncaster. It's cheaper because you aren't benefitting from the ability to use the "premium" East Coast Main Line between York and Doncaster.

Travelling via Leeds is perfectly valid with the "not via Doncaster" ticket, both because it's a permitted route and doesn't involve travelling via Doncaster (thus it fulfils the route restriction), and also because it is a route offered by a journey planner (which means it's contractually valid if you buy a ticket in conjunction with that itinerary).
In what way, even historically, was an ECML journey between Doncaster and York seen as a premium service, but one between Doncaster and Leeds, potentially on the same TOC, not?
 

YorkRailFan

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2023
Messages
1,984
Location
York
There are two routes of walk-up fares (Anytime/Off-Peak) between York and Hull: "Any Permitted" or "not via Doncaster". The "Any Permitted" allows you to use any of the permitted routes, which are:
One could also do York-Garforth-Selby-Hull I imagine?
Notwithstanding the lack of frequency a few years back, it's not that much of a mystery. Are you proposing that the permitted routes via Doncaster be abolished? If so, then this would result in people who use TOC websites not being able to obtain itineraries for what can be the quickest route at that moment in time. The forum's site would still offer such journeys, but only with a combination of tickets.
I considered going via Doncaster a few years ago when there was a strike on Northern (back before it was an OLR) and getting HT from Doncaster.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
72,882
Location
Yorkshire
In what way, even historically, was an ECML journey between Doncaster and York seen as a premium service, but one between Doncaster and Leeds, potentially on the same TOC, not?
While it's true that York - Leeds is charged at a premium, the non-"premium" York - Hull fare is not cheap, at a whopping £25.20 for the lowest priced day return fare (avoiding Doncaster) for a poor quality service.

This is more costly than the expensive Leeds to York fare, so there should be no concerns about protecting the premiumness of Leeds to York!

Indeed due to TPE pricing policies, Hull to Leeds is actually more a "premium" fare these days! But that's down to TPE abolising day returns, so not a like-for-like comparison (when comparing like-for-like, an Off Peak Return from York to Hull does cost more than Hull to Leeds, and certainly qualified under the old BR "reasonableness" test).

York to Doncaster is charged at the maximum premium LNER can get away with, however LNER are constrained by the York to Sheffield fare. Indeed in the past, the previous ICEC franchise holder did attempt to ramp up York to Doncaster to more than York to Sheffield however it was pointed out on this forum that people could simply buy Sheffield fares, and finish 'short'.

So yes York to Doncaster is charged at a premium, albeit not as much of a premium as LNER want to charge. York to Leeds is also charged at a premium, but again TPE can't ramp it up too much because of being undercut by Northern Only fares. In both cases, there are longer distance fares which undercut the premium fares, but obviously I can't divulge those here, as they would be placed under threat, if so.

York to Hull is a very expensive journey for the poor quality, and considering the cities are only 34 miles apart. The 'direct' trains go a long way round and take just over an hour (if you're lucky). Going via Doncaster makes the journey even more expensive, but the option absolutely should be there.

Going back to York to Doncaster, LNER continue to charge a premium in terms of the single fare costing £22.60 after 0939, and £25.10 before that. The only way to avoid the premium is by purchasing a return, and the only reason LNER offer returns is because otherwise people would buy Sheffield returns and start/finish short. LNER would love to charge £22.60 each way if they possibly could, but are constrained by other operators. No doubt LNER are keen for DfT to instruct other operators to abolish returns. But that's for another thread.


Summary:
  • York - Doncaster is expensive, but not as expensive as LNER want it to be
  • York - Leeds is expensive, but TPE do have competition from Northern
  • York - Hull is very slow and expensive avoiding Doncaster and is extortionate via Doncaster
  • Leeds - Hull is expensive and TPE have made it more so by abolishing Day Returns; TPE would be trying the same tactic for York - Leeds if they could get away with it.
Although Hull to York would generally be done direct, it does not make sense to completely bar travel via Doncaster. There is perhaps an argument that there should be an even cheaper fare to avoid Leeds and Doncaster, but sadly there isn't. Northern won't introduce one because they would just see that as a reduction in revenue. People on a tight budget can do the journey for a tiny fraction of the cost by bus, which is probably more attractive from suburb to suburb if on the route, but is slow for city centre to city centre.

  • The fares we see as expensive are seen as 'too cheap' by the DfT/TOCs.
  • The fares we see as about right are seen as way too cheap by DfT/TOCs
  • The fares we see as really expensive are seen as 'about right' by DfT/TOCs.

The root issue here is that our fares are expensive; this is not going to get better, it will only get worse. Sites such as the forum's ticketing site will try to find ways round it, where we can, and while we can!
 
Last edited:

D6700

Member
Joined
13 Mar 2010
Messages
695
There are two routes of walk-up fares (Anytime/Off-Peak) between York and Hull: "Any Permitted" or "not via Doncaster". The "Any Permitted" allows you to use any of the permitted routes, which are:
  • via Doncaster, then via Goole or Selby to Hull (optionally you could go via Selby to reach Doncaster, and continue to Hull via Goole, but this would rarely make sense as it is so much slower and there are only around 10 Selby-Doncaster trains a day, several bunched together)
  • via Church Fenton or Harrogate to Leeds, then via Selby to Hull
  • via Sherburn-in-Elmet or direct to Selby, then direct to Hull
The "not via Doncaster" ticket allows you to take any of the above routes, other than those via Doncaster. It's cheaper because you aren't benefitting from the ability to use the "premium" East Coast Main Line between York and Doncaster.

Travelling via Leeds is perfectly valid with the "not via Doncaster" ticket, both because it's a permitted route and doesn't involve travelling via Doncaster (thus it fulfils the route restriction), and also because it is a route offered by a journey planner (which means it's contractually valid if you buy a ticket in conjunction with that itinerary).
I would agree, except that there is a "negative easement" (I hate that term!):

700479 Customers travelling from Hull to York in possession of tickets routed "not via Doncaster" may not travel via Leeds. This easement applies in both directions.

Certainly, the LNER and Raileasy Trainplit sites apply this rule, only selling the more expensive Any Permitted ticket if specifying via Leeds.

Personally, I feel this restriction is not particularly fair, but it is there.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
31,048
Location
Fenny Stratford
Many are statements of the obvious, for example Northallerton to Leeds, routed via York. What other route could you possibly take?
Via Newcastle & Carlisle ;)

( which I did MANY years ago on such a ticket! I am not sure it was valid even then but non complained about a teenager doing it)
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
13,911
Location
UK
I would agree, except that there is a "negative easement" (I hate that term!):

700479 Customers travelling from Hull to York in possession of tickets routed "not via Doncaster" may not travel via Leeds. This easement applies in both directions.

Certainly, the LNER and Raileasy Trainplit sites apply this rule, only selling the more expensive Any Permitted ticket if specifying via Leeds.

Personally, I feel this restriction is not particularly fair, but it is there.
Ah, I did miss that. In practice I cannot imagine many guards being familiar with this negative easement, and the worst that could happen if you did encounter one of them would be to pay the excess to the "Any Permitted" fare. Given that the "not via Doncaster" fare doesn't say anything about having to avoid Leeds (which even caught me out!) the average passenger doesn't have a chance...
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
20,615
Location
West of Andover
.
Ah, I did miss that. In practice I cannot imagine many guards being familiar with this negative easement, and the worst that could happen if you did encounter one of them would be to pay the excess to the "Any Permitted" fare. Given that the "not via Doncaster" fare doesn't say anything about having to avoid Leeds (which even caught me out!) the average passenger doesn't have a chance...
Cue that fare route getting updated from "not via Doncaster" to "not via Doncaster/Leeds" to save 'confusion' for passengers
 

greyman42

Established Member
Joined
14 Aug 2017
Messages
5,280
This is very true; it was also particularly the case that the first journey opportunity of the day would often be via Doncaster.
The last weekday service from Hull to York is also via Doncaster.
 

Shaw S Hunter

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2016
Messages
3,224
Location
Over The Hill
Roll on the campaign to reopen the direct route.
It's more sensible than Aberystwyth-Carmarthen. But as likely to happen as Colne-Skipton or Northallerton-Ripon! Despite being one of the definite Beeching mistakes there are too many breaks in the available formation for it to be possible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top