Western 52
Member
As per the thread title - scope is the national rail network and buildings still used for railway purposes (not necessarily their original railway purpose). So what is likely to be the oldest building?
I thought Edge Hill but it seems the present building (albeit very old) is not the original one. If Earlestown dates from the line's actually opening that would be it (or Rainhill?).Possibly one of the Liverpool and Manchester stations, maybe Earlestown or Edge Hill?
Earlestown dates from 1835. The 1830 station building at the Manchester terminus is still there, but its not on the National network any more.actually opening
Yes, the Earlestown building is probably the oldest, although the interior is currently closed to the public.Earlestown dates from 1835. The 1830 station building at the Manchester terminus is still there, but its not on the National network any more.
Edge Hill Station dates from 1830, but the buildings date from 1836.I thought Edge Hill
Does it still have it's original buildings?Hexham station is said (on Wikipedia) to have opened in March 1835, and is a Grade II listed building.
Does it still have it's original buildings?
Deptford opened 8th Feb 1836 is the oldest in London, also worth a mention are the remains (quadripartite arches in the shopping arcade) of the original London bridge station which opened to traffic on 14th December as construction took longer than expected and they used a temporary station further east for 10 months.The carriage ramp at Deptford dates to the original London to Greenwich railway so must be in with a shout?
I recall Edge Hill being restored to "original" condition, for Liverpool & Manchester 150 in 1980 I think, but of course the original station was under the Moorish arch a short distance to the south. Earlestown was similarly featured in this event, but other posts suggest it only dates back to the opening of the Warrington branch. Do any of the other L&M stations still operating have original buildings that might be earlier? I don't think there are any such on the Stockton and Darlington.I thought Edge Hill but it seems the present building (albeit very old) is not the original one. If Earlestown dates from the line's actually opening that would be it (or Rainhill?).
Yes I was thinking of any railway structures in the OP. I was wondering about tunnels and bridges, plus any minor or ancillary buildings that might still be about.Does a tunnel count as a building ?
If so, how about Strood tunnel, 1824.
Maybe not really a railway building.....What about Conwy? Castle built in 1287....
If bridges are allowed, the Causey Arch was completed in 1726. It is almost part of the Tanfield Railway route.Yes I was thinking of any railway structures in the OP. I was wondering about tunnels and bridges, plus any minor or ancillary buildings that might still be about.
Not on the national network though?If bridges are allowed, the Causey Arch was completed in 1726. It is almost part of the Tanfield Railway route.
The only one I can think of is the original booking office building in Bridge Road, Stockton (built before 1825 as a private house)....but it's no longer located on the rail network.I don't think there are any such on the Stockton and Darlington.
Strood tunnel was first built for a canal to link the Thames to the Medway thus short-circuiting a potentially dangerous trip around the North Foreland. At some 2.25 miles long it was the second-longest canal tunnel in Britain. Twenty years later the Canal Company changed itself into a Railway and Canal company and built a single line through the tunnel partly on the towpath and partly supported from the canal bed. Boats and trains shared the tunnel for some 18 months before the South Eastern Railway bought up the company, filled in the canal through the tunnel and installed a second line of track.Does a tunnel count as a building ?
If so, how about Strood tunnel, 1824.
it dates from that period but is not in railway use.EDIT: Is the former station building at Heighington the original 1825 structure?