• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

open electrified line in sections

Status
Not open for further replies.

robert2000

Member
Joined
20 Feb 2009
Messages
444
Location
Chester
i think it would look better if the line would be done in sections and opened up so it looks better. and people can see the timetable gradually improve each year.

for example
london - bristol to open in 2015
london - cardiff to open in 2016
london - swansea to open in 2017
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

djw1981

Established Member
Joined
10 Jul 2007
Messages
2,642
Location
Glasgow
That does mean changing tra8ins at Biristol for Cardiff and Swansea for a year or two though.
 

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
12,122
what about London-Penzance

:lol: Would be interesting at certain places along the route if it was third rail electric.

2429352758_6bd498fe79.jpg
 

johnb

Member
Joined
26 Jun 2009
Messages
223
The government's report says "London to Oxford, Newbury and Bristol by the end of 2016, and London to Swansea by the end of 2017."

There's not much point in doing it before 2016, as the 319s from Thameslink will only be released then...
 

djw1981

Established Member
Joined
10 Jul 2007
Messages
2,642
Location
Glasgow
Will the 377 not be being cascaded from TL by then as well? And I guess there is a high chance of some new EMUs being procured to influence the 2015 election in GWML constituencies.
 

thelem

Member
Joined
17 Mar 2008
Messages
550
They are already talking about London - Reading as part of crossrail (or at least, delivered at the same time as crossrail, so that would be well before Bristol). I agree it would be good to get the benefit as soon as possible, but only if there are existing trains terminating along the way - you don't want to disrupt the timetable if you can avoid it.
 

johnb

Member
Joined
26 Jun 2009
Messages
223
Will the 377 not be being cascaded from TL by then as well? And I guess there is a high chance of some new EMUs being procured to influence the 2015 election in GWML constituencies.

377s from TL are going to go to the Southern (that's why they've already got SN internal spec).

And I doubt, given the likely financial situation, that any new commuter EMUs are going to be procured that aren't for Thameslink or Crossrail (unless it turns out there's something cataclysmically wrong with the 1980s EMUs and they need scrapping early).
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
They are already talking about London - Reading as part of crossrail (or at least, delivered at the same time as crossrail, so that would be well before Bristol). I agree it would be good to get the benefit as soon as possible, but only if there are existing trains terminating along the way - you don't want to disrupt the timetable if you can avoid it.

Bristol is planned for 2016 - Crossrail is planned for 2017. So not really...
 
Joined
27 Jul 2009
Messages
5
Location
Oxford
i think it would look better if the line would be done in sections and opened up so it looks better. and people can see the timetable gradually improve each year.

for example
london - bristol to open in 2015
london - cardiff to open in 2016
london - swansea to open in 2017

What about the sections to Newbury and Oxford. Would they open with the Bristol mainline?
 

schenker

Member
Joined
7 Jun 2009
Messages
61
Location
Devon
Where's the fun in that? Nothing like going round the coast in an intercity train.

I'm partial to stopping off in Dawlish myself.


Well there is no fun in that is there, Give me a HST to ride the coast any day! :D

Dawlish sea wall electrification would be impossible wouldn't it anyhow?
 

Bayum

Established Member
Joined
21 Mar 2008
Messages
2,933
Location
Leeds
Well there is no fun in that is there, Give me a HST to ride the coast any day! :D

Dawlish sea wall electrification would be impossible wouldn't it anyhow?

Where theres a will, theres a way... However, the way will probably be more expensive than the government would like to spend
 

Metroland

Established Member
Joined
20 Jul 2005
Messages
3,212
Location
Midlands
All electrification projects open in sections, ECML certainly did as did the WCML and GEML.
 

schenker

Member
Joined
7 Jun 2009
Messages
61
Location
Devon
Don't see why it would be harder than Saltcoats, unless the water or something is different:


Oh right, I'm still new to this and was unaware of Saltcoats, I just assumed that
if a big lump of water crashed over it would possibly short out or something...
 

Waverley125

Member
Joined
2 Sep 2008
Messages
1,008
Location
Leeds, West Yorkshire
does saltcoats have people walking immediatley the other side of the line though? we don't want people walking along and getting electrocuted as the water conducts the sparks off of the OHL.
 

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
20,438
Location
0035
does saltcoats have people walking immediatley the other side of the line though? we don't want people walking along and getting electrocuted as the water conducts the sparks off of the OHL.
Yes it does you can walk alongside between the sea and the line.
 

Phoenix

Established Member
Joined
11 Mar 2008
Messages
2,019
Location
birmingham
does saltcoats have people walking immediatley the other side of the line though? we don't want people walking along and getting electrocuted as the water conducts the sparks off of the OHL.

I think the boffins of BR back in the day took some time to sort that problem out otherwise electrification along large bodies of water would just not happen.

As for the old Dawlish theorists out there I can honestly say I doubt it's going to happen any times soon as the maintainence cost to that section of line for the wires would be staggering considering salt water does an amazing job at corroding the majority of metal types.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Its simple - you use 50kV insulation :)

Then how would trains collect the current :D
 

johnb

Member
Joined
26 Jun 2009
Messages
223
I think the boffins of BR back in the day took some time to sort that problem out otherwise electrification along large bodies of water would just not happen.

As for the old Dawlish theorists out there I can honestly say I doubt it's going to happen any times soon as the maintainence cost to that section of line for the wires would be staggering considering salt water does an amazing job at corroding the majority of metal types.

Eh? How come Saltcoats (name = type of water) works, then?
 

starrymarkb

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2009
Messages
5,985
Location
Exeter
Then how would trains collect the current :D

Through the bare contact wire. The main risk of shorting out is between pole and wire. So you use 50kv insulators to increase the gap between wire and pole.

if the sea is sufficiently high to short the wire to ground (providing a continuous path - not spray) then you don't want to be running trains on the wall however powered.

Also Dawlish is relativly sheltered as it faces east (most storms blow from the west)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top