Jamesrob637
Established Member
- Joined
- 12 Aug 2016
- Messages
- 5,636
Could this be done with only one stop at Exeter? 1 hour 45 to Exeter and 45 to Plymouth.
Not a chance, even if you removed Reading, Newton Abbot and Totnes you would only save around 12 ish minutes. Where are you saving 15 minutes from the current time of 2 hours from Padd to Exeter?Could this be done with only one stop at Exeter? 1 hour 45 to Exeter and 45 to Plymouth.
Not a chance, even if you removed Reading, Newton Abbot and Totnes you would only save around 12 ish minutes. Where are you saving 15 minutes from the current time of 2 hours from Padd to Exeter?
There will be a limited stop Penzance train this summer only stopping at Exeter before Plymouth. Leaving Paddington at 12:03, it will arrive at Plymouth at 14:54, a journey time of 2h 51m. That must be about the best you'd get with today's infrastructure and trains. Cornish passengers will get little benefit from this acceleration however as the train is then timed to stand at Plymouth for 10 minutes. Times from London to Cornish stations are about 5 minutes faster than those applying today for the equivalent train with more stops or at other times of the day. Missing Reading, with its many connections, creates a four hour gap between direct trains for Cornwall from the town.What's the current fastest journey time? = ~Three hours?
Try the Sectional Appendix, which sets them out in diagrammatic form.Don't know line speeds west of Newbury I'm afraid.
There is only one stop, Reading. Which costs about 4-5 minutes. You need a LOT of improvements to get another 10 minutes.Non stop and with a couple of line improvements here and there. Don't know line speeds west of Newbury I'm afraid.
This wait is a little shame. Bridge-based? Cornwall itself is more important than Plymouth as a market - in summer certainly. Although I would say that none of this is super time critical.There will be a limited stop Penzance train this summer only stopping at Exeter before Plymouth. Leaving Paddington at 12:03, it will arrive at Plymouth at 14:54, a journey time of 2h 51m. That must be about the best you'd get with today's infrastructure and trains. Cornish passengers will get little benefit from this acceleration however as the train is then timed to stand at Plymouth for 10 minutes. Times from London to Cornish stations are about 5 minutes faster than those applying today for the equivalent train with more stops or at other times of the day. Missing Reading, with its many connections, creates a four hour gap between direct trains for Cornwall from the town.
. Don't know line speeds west of Newbury I'm afraid.
The direct Plymouth coaches from Tiverton Parkway were no slower than the regular rail timings I recall.When the line was closed at Dawlish, wasn't it shown faster than the regular service from Cornwall to London to take a coach down the A30 or A38 and M5 to Tiverton Parkway and train from there?
That is as much because of the twists and turns resulting from the landscape as the stations on the way.But I think if regular services to Cornwall were Exeter-Totnes-Plymouth only, that would stimulate demand. It can feel very slow, esp at the country end.
Tiverton Parkway to Plymouth non stop is similar by road and train given the road and rail network.When the line was closed at Dawlish, wasn't it shown faster than the regular service from Cornwall to London to take a coach down the A30 or A38 and M5 to Tiverton Parkway and train from there?
Why?Could this be done with only one stop at Exeter? 1 hour 45 to Exeter and 45 to Plymouth.
When the line was closed at Dawlish, wasn't it shown faster than the regular service from Cornwall to London to take a coach down the A30 or A38 and M5 to Tiverton Parkway and train from there?
Not stopping at Totnes on the down is where the biggest time savings are made in my experience due to the stiff climb up Rattery.
Three hours or very slightly under is the nearest you’ll get.
I think the tight curvature is just down to building within a limited budget in a difficult landscape, following contours to limit extents of new earthworks and structures. A maximum design speed of 50 or 60mph was about all that was achievable with any technology of the time, so wasn't unreasonably low. The trains were lightweight though and propulsion was independent of friction which allowed the steep gradients, also limiting work and costs. People feared early steam wouldn't manage such steep gradients but fortunately, loco technology and capabilities were developing rapidly.Exeter - Plymouth was built with the intention of using atmospheric power for propulsion. The kindest way to describe this was 'fine when working, utterly useless the moment anything went wrong'. The consequence was that Newton Abbot - Plymouth in particular was built with sharper curves and steeper gradients than would have been used for steam traction, with consequences which last today. Not Brunel's finest hour.
Having some moderate battery storage and boost capability onboard in a hybrid configuration might be useful for such fairly short bursts of strenuous activity, supplementing and protecting the engine, and capturing braking energy when descending hills.I suspect the only modest improvement you might get is putting discontinuous electrification on the Newton Abbot - Plymouth section to improve acceleration and reduce maintenance on the 802s. I suspect standing starts in either direction at Totnes on hot summer days put some strain on the diesel engines. Probably still a difficult sell to the DfT / Treasury.
2hrs 51m to Plymouth.
There’s a train from June with a near on clean path that matches the OP’s stopping pattern!
Realtime Trains | 1203 London Paddington to Penzance | 12/06/2024
Real-time train running information for 1203 departure from London Paddington to Penzance on 12/06/2024. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
Not massively, except for when a train does stop at Totnes, would soon be back up to linepseed, but certainly on a non stop run from Exeter to Plymouth it wouldn't make much difference.Would electrification bring anything to the party - the 80Xs seem very sluggish compared to HSTs on the South Devon banks?
I reckon it saves a minute in braking, two minutes for the station stop, and then you don't get back to 60mph for about 5 minutes (roughly) once departed (HSTs where quicker). My maths isn't good enough to calculate how much time is lost by being generally at around 0 to 40ish mph for those 5 minutes or so departing Totnes, but I reckon in total stopping at Totnes adds around about 5 or 6 minutes to the schedule.Interesting, I asked about that before & was informed it'd save very little - how much do you think you'd actually get? Not stopping at either Taunton & Tiverton is not a great service, they're both railheads for a vast area which does admittedly overlap. Back when we lived in Tiverton we'd go to Taunton if there wasn't a train calling at either Jct or Parkway in the right timeframe.
Take out the allowances and it is actually 2h45!2hrs 51m to Plymouth.
There’s a train from June with a near on clean path that matches the OP’s stopping pattern!
Realtime Trains | 1203 London Paddington to Penzance | 12/06/2024
Real-time train running information for 1203 departure from London Paddington to Penzance on 12/06/2024. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
Take out the allowances and it is actually 2h45!
I appreciate that, but it shows what can at least be theoretically achieved with a completely clear run. Albeit only stopping to pick-up at Exeter though, rather than an open call.Yes but engineering allowance is mandatory to cover for any TSRs. In planning terms that is not allowed to be removed.
Looking forward to driving it I must admit, will make a change from the usual all stations stuff Plymouth crews are usually lumbered with!That 12:03 looks good. Bet there won't be too many Advances on it.