• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Peterborough to Leicester Line Bridge Bash.

Status
Not open for further replies.

TheBigD

Established Member
Joined
19 Nov 2008
Messages
2,042
Bridge between Ketton and Luffenham damaged by Bridge bash and line currently closed.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20221105-142651_Facebook.jpg
    Screenshot_20221105-142651_Facebook.jpg
    692.2 KB · Views: 158
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
9,192
Location
Central Belt
Anyone know how much if anything the insurance company of the lorry have to pay? I suspect the driver will get 3 points and a very small fine.
 

TheBigD

Established Member
Joined
19 Nov 2008
Messages
2,042
More photos from Facebook...
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20221105-154203_Facebook.jpg
    Screenshot_20221105-154203_Facebook.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 422
  • Screenshot_20221105-154209_Facebook.jpg
    Screenshot_20221105-154209_Facebook.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 413
  • Screenshot_20221105-154215_Facebook.jpg
    Screenshot_20221105-154215_Facebook.jpg
    1,023.1 KB · Views: 407
  • Screenshot_20221105-154230_Facebook.jpg
    Screenshot_20221105-154230_Facebook.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 416

londonmidland

Established Member
Joined
22 Dec 2009
Messages
2,033
Location
Leicester
Internal reports suggest that the Down line will remain out of use for several weeks, due to the damage.
 

TheBigD

Established Member
Joined
19 Nov 2008
Messages
2,042
Internal reports suggest that the Down line will remain out of use for several weeks, due to the damage.

If that's the case then I'd expect both lines to be effectively shut as its an awfully long section to do any single line working, or just up direction trains allowed*.

SLW Section would need to be Ketton to Langham over the up line and the crossover at Ketton would require down trains to reverse to access the up line. That would also seriously impact the trains that run via Corby on the Langham to Manton section.

(happy to be corrected but I'm pretty sure that the crossover at Manton on the Peterborough line was removed/taken out of use a few years ago. The other crossover at Manton is on the Corby line and of no use in this situation.)

*for passengers trains I'd expect services to be turned around at Stamford and Melton though Peterborough and Leicester would be operationally easier.
 
Last edited:

High Dyke

Established Member
Joined
1 Jan 2013
Messages
4,571
Location
Yellabelly Country
Internal reports suggest that the Down line will remain out of use for several weeks, due to the damage.
Network Rail are advising disruption on that route until next Saturday (12th).

Signage wise, from the A1 there are about five signs before the bridge. From the A47 there are four signs, with two from the Wireless Hill roundabout before the bridge. Part of the investigation will include checking the appropriate signage is in place.
 

TheBigD

Established Member
Joined
19 Nov 2008
Messages
2,042
From Facebook again...
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20221105-175937_Facebook.jpg
    Screenshot_20221105-175937_Facebook.jpg
    583.6 KB · Views: 327

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
32,016
Looking at that bridge it’s major structural damage. My guess is a new deck as a minimum.
 

TheBigD

Established Member
Joined
19 Nov 2008
Messages
2,042
Looking at that bridge it’s major structural damage. My guess is a new deck as a minimum.
One of my colleagues laughed at the suggestion of just a month's closure. He's of a similar opinion to you.

Would 12-18 months be pessimistic?
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
32,016
One of my colleagues laughed at the suggestion of just a month's closure. He's of a similar opinion to you.

too early to say. But I’d have a tenner at any price it will be back before Christmas (this year!) and an even bet that it’s back before the end of this month.
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
8,184
One of my colleagues laughed at the suggestion of just a month's closure. He's of a similar opinion to you.

Would 12-18 months be pessimistic?
To be fair given it's a critical freight route (I don't think big boxes can go via Bottesford, only the smaller ones) so a huge diversion I assume it'll be just about priority one to fix even if they have to rip the whole bridge out and start again!
 

TheBigD

Established Member
Joined
19 Nov 2008
Messages
2,042
To be fair given it's a critical freight route (I don't think big boxes can go via Bottesford, only the smaller ones) so a huge diversion I assume it'll be just about priority one to fix even if they have to rip the whole bridge out and start again!

Big boxes aren't cleared via Bottesford. For example see the route this freightliner, 4L10, takes...



When the bridge at Stonea was hit and the beam snapped in October 2019 it was nearly 18 months before it was fully repaired and the road opened. The railway opened pretty quickly with a speed restriction and the bridge supported by a whole load of adjustable supports*.

Will be interesting to see what happens at Ketton/Luffenham but colleagues have suggested there is more damage. Time will tell, you know what the railway rumour mill is like!!!

* I'm sure they have a proper name but it escape me at the moment.
 

Sonik

Member
Joined
7 Jun 2022
Messages
334
Location
WCML South
To be fair given it's a critical freight route (I don't think big boxes can go via Bottesford, only the smaller ones) so a huge diversion I assume it'll be just about priority one to fix even if they have to rip the whole bridge out and start again!
Loads of paths in the system but it doesn't look like much freight actually runs this way?
 

TheBigD

Established Member
Joined
19 Nov 2008
Messages
2,042
Loads of paths in the system but it doesn't look like much freight actually runs this way?
I can't recall liners going that way in recent times. When Leicester-Peterbough is shut for overnight maintenance 1 week in 8, the stone traffic from Mountsorrel and elsewhere goes that way but the liners go via London.
 

Sonik

Member
Joined
7 Jun 2022
Messages
334
Location
WCML South
I can't recall liners going that way in recent times. When Leicester-Peterbough is shut for overnight maintenance 1 week in 8, the stone traffic from Mountsorrel and elsewhere goes that way but the liners go via London.
That's the impression I get, boxes all day long in my neck of the woods.

There are a handful that go via Luffenham, mostly to/from Hams Hall it seems. But most of the other paths don't actualy get used.
 
Last edited:

ExRes

Established Member
Joined
16 Dec 2012
Messages
6,664
Location
Back in Sussex
Have to say that my opinion would be to support the bridge from underneath so that the line can be reopened as soon as possible, obviously block the road in order to do it and let drivers find an alternative, I'm sure Rutland CC and the lorries owners, if indeed a 3rd party, would be happy to explain the diversionary routes and arrange funding for the repairs
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
32,815
Have to say that my opinion would be to support the bridge from underneath so that the line can be reopened as soon as possible, obviously block the road in order to do it and let drivers find an alternative, I'm sure Rutland CC and the lorries owners, if indeed a 3rd party, would be happy to explain the diversionary routes and arrange funding for the repairs
I think the right side main girder of the right hand bridge span looks twisted away from the vertical, I doubt it will just be a case of supporting it.
 

TheBigD

Established Member
Joined
19 Nov 2008
Messages
2,042
Have to say that my opinion would be to support the bridge from underneath so that the line can be reopened as soon as possible, obviously block the road in order to do it and let drivers find an alternative, I'm sure Rutland CC and the lorries owners, if indeed a 3rd party, would be happy to explain the diversionary routes and arrange funding for the repairs

The diversion route for road traffic isn't that much further, couple of miles at most. It's already sign posted as the alternative route for high vehicles.
 

a good off

Member
Joined
2 Jul 2010
Messages
348
Location
Control Room
The WCML will be busier with diversions. It was only about three weeks ago when Channelsea Jn was blocked that we managed to divert stuff this way including 4 dead class 90s being dragged inside a liner.
 

66701GBRF

Member
Joined
3 Jun 2017
Messages
804
Loads of paths in the system but it doesn't look like much freight actually runs this way?

All of our Birch Coppice and Hams Hall intermodal services run that way as does the return portion of Trafford Park service (except when all services are diverted via London during engineering work 2 out of 8 weeks). There is lots of aggregates that run that way too.

This week has been “London week” where services are diverted via WCML/ECML/GEML due to engineering work between Peterborough and Stowmarket which is probably why it doesn’t look like much stuff runs that way.
 

Ken H

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2018
Messages
6,587
Location
N Yorks
I am afraid more bridges need 'Goalposts' each side. The government shoukd fund this, not the railway. Maybe a special levy on HGVs could provide funding.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top