• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Possible AC EMU future cascade scenarios?

Status
Not open for further replies.

ls2270

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2012
Messages
3,641
The first Class 360/2 is on its way for scrap today:
5Q76 1001 Bicester MOD to Newport Docks: 37611 hauling 360205.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

DBS92042

Established Member
Joined
13 Apr 2019
Messages
1,286
I presume ROG haven't found any work for them and all 5 will go in due course
 

ls2270

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2012
Messages
3,641
Yes another sub class begins its journey to oblivion!
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,442
The first one is on its way for scrap today:
5Q76 1001 Bicester MOD to Newport Docks: 37611 hauling 360205.
I don’t think anyone here expected any of ROG‘s proposals were ever going to work. Spot hire? Parcels?
 

Class360/1

Member
Joined
10 Feb 2021
Messages
652
Location
Essex
I’m shocked but not shocked at the and time.

Shocked because of their condition and age, but not because ROGs proposals would never work

Shame EMR didn’t want them to bolster their existing /1s
 

ls2270

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2012
Messages
3,641
I’m shocked but not shocked at the and time.

Shocked because of their condition and age, but not because ROGs proposals would never work

Shame EMR didn’t want them to bolster their existing /1s
Yea absolutely. Would have thought the parts would have been useful for the 360/1 fleet at the very least.
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
4,481
Rail Operations Group said after they bought them that the placement of some equipment made them unsuitable for freight. Presumably they never found a business for passenger spot hire (I'm guessing Desiros are cleared on most of the electrified network). (source)
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,442
Yea absolutely. Would have thought the parts would have been useful for the 360/1 fleet at the very least.
But nearly all the parts of a 360/1 will be common to 350 and 450, and some common to 444. So it’s highly unlikely Siemens will be struggling for parts at all.

Although parts recovery is suggested many times when units are scrapped, how often is it ever actually done or needed?
 

Invincible

Member
Joined
23 Apr 2022
Messages
421
Location
Surrey
But nearly all the parts of a 360/1 will be common to 350 and 450, and some common to 444. So it’s highly unlikely Siemens will be struggling for parts at all.

Although parts recovery is suggested many times when units are scrapped, how often is it ever actually done or needed?
Would have thought SWR could have used and maintained them with the 360s, but seem committed to the 701 (when they finally enter service?)
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
4,481
Would have thought SWR could have used and maintained them with the 360s, but seem committed to the 701 (when they finally enter service?)
They would need modifications for 3rd rail.

Unfortunately ROG got them as the DfT were slimming down fleets at TOCs so spot hire wasn't going to be big business.
 
Joined
1 Sep 2018
Messages
467
Location
Malvern to Minffordd
Would have thought SWR should have used and maintained them with the 360s, but seem committed to the 701 (when they finally enter service?)
25 extra coaches would help out with SWR for a short term, but nothings ever as simple as that. It's bizzare how 20 year old EMUs with air con (unlike the 365s), TPWS (unlike the 332s) can be sent for scrap whilst diesel lingers on - and while they are a small subfleet, that are certainly compatible with several others being part of the Desiro family.
 

Class360/1

Member
Joined
10 Feb 2021
Messages
652
Location
Essex
But nearly all the parts of a 360/1 will be common to 350 and 450, and some common to 444. So it’s highly unlikely Siemens will be struggling for parts at all.

Although parts recovery is suggested many times when units are scrapped, how often is it ever actually done or needed?
Not very often, as most of the time an entire class (bar 1 for preservation) is scrapped at once.

Doesn’t often happen at Newport.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
18,818
What will happen to the spares acquired? Will they be sent to EMR?
There may not be any spares. Depends on the value of the spares and the value of the material as scrap.

As an example, the seat frames would in theory be useful for other Desiro fleets but where would they be kept until they were needed?
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,442
What will happen to the spares acquired? Will they be sent to EMR?
I tried to explain earlier why there may not need to be any spares recovery at all. In any case, EMR 360/1s come under Northampton Kings Heath for major maintenance, in common with all the similar 350s, so I’d expect that’s where spares are controlled from for the AC and dual voltage units.
 

43066

Established Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
9,429
Location
London
Any chance they can do the EMR 360s while they’re about it? ;)
 
Last edited:

AlexNL

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2014
Messages
1,683
Wasn't it also the case that the 360/2s had ATP and AWS but not TPWS, thus being an oddity which would never be mainline certified without adjustments? Or was that the case for the 332s?
 

Jturner98

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2021
Messages
284
Location
Kent
Surprised there wasn’t talk of them temporary going to LNWR to see off some or all of the remaining 319s until the 730s are ready.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
18,818
Surprised there wasn’t talk of them temporary going to LNWR to see off some or all of the remaining 319s until the 730s are ready.
One of the things it appears DfT are very keen to avoid is driver training costs, although the conversion from 350s would perhaps not be substantial. It also isn't known how far the 360/2s were away from the need for expensive overhauls to continue to operate.

At the time the 360s became spare, the need for them to provide cover somewhere wasn't identified. It isn't always easy to take stock from sidings and put it back into service after an idle period.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,442
Surprised there wasn’t talk of them temporary going to LNWR to see off some or all of the remaining 319s until the 730s are ready.
I think just about anything you could possibly think of regarding other TOC services was covered back in the 2020 suggestions thread before they were retired to ROG. Someone did actually suggest the Abbey Flyer.

If anyone needs a refresh, here’s the last significant speculation thread:
 

adc82140

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2008
Messages
2,933
It seems utterly wasteful, but to be blunt there is absolutely no use anywhere for a microfleet of these. WMR are binning off some similar 350s, so would have no interest. EMR have said they don't want them. Converting them to DC for SWR would be too costly, as non gangwayed they would be non standard in the fleet. Export was unlikely, as there are just 5 units. They have been sat outside rotting for a handful of years, so scrap it is.

I wonder if any will end up with the emergency services. A modern train to practice on.
 

RealTrains07

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2019
Messages
1,762
One does wonder whether the 360/2s will be the last modern stock to go to scrap??

very concerning times.
 

Jturner98

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2021
Messages
284
Location
Kent
Maybe Porterbrook might snap one up to use as a test bed for battery trials. Apparently they are looking at fitting batteries to the 350/2 units. But that seems to of done quiet now.
 

Halish Railway

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2017
Messages
1,712
Location
West Yorkshire / Birmingham
What a farce, a complete failure of our railways.

How many cancelled / Graylinged / slowly implemented / otherwise possible electrification schemes would have found a home for these units? I’m specifically looking at the Midland Mainline electrification, alongside the electrification of its branch lines such as Matlock that would have enabled stopping services to switch over to electric traction.

Say what you want about these units, but the people of the East Midlands would bite your arm off for some high capacity, high performance, reliable electric trains instead of the best offering for stopping services in the East Midlands, a sluggish 3 carriage Class 170.
 

LOL The Irony

On Moderation
Joined
29 Jul 2017
Messages
5,335
Location
Chinatown, New York
Insanity. Trains less than 20 years old and with similar classes all around the world, being sent for scrap whilst Mk3 based EMUs still blight the network. Total insanity.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top