Mikey C
Established Member
- Joined
- 11 Feb 2013
- Messages
- 7,510
The walk back to the centre of Liverpool isn't exactly pleasant either, and being on the river front restricts the options.
Google Maps is quoting 34 minutes walk from the stadium to the Pier Head (So in the real world about 25)The walk back to the centre of Liverpool isn't exactly pleasant either, and being on the river front restricts the options.
I did the walk a couple of weeks ago while in the area. The pavements might not be able to cope with the numbers for a start.Google Maps is quoting 34 minutes walk from the stadium to the Pier Head (So in the real world about 25)
That is certainly what I would do rather than faff around having to walk in the wrong direction to Sandhills. Perhaps Sandhills is going to be mainly for those coming to and from the North and East of the city centre?
There is nothing inherently unpleasant about this walk. Whilst there are indeed some quasi derelict sites, there is also quite a lot of redevelopment.
Walking to and from Anfield and Goodison Park to the City Centre is a tried and tested activity every time there is a football match. And of course there are taxis and buses. I don't think Everton's move will lead to a major change in public transport usage.I did the walk a couple of weeks ago while in the area. The pavements might not be able to cope with the numbers for a start.
From memory, walking back from the old White Hart Lane stadium to Seven Sisters after an evening game, I remember everyone walking in the road. Maybe they'll need to shut some of the roads back to Liverpool to traffic for half an hour after the game.
Next stations along are Bank Hall and Kirkdale. Otherwise it's MoorfieldsAre there any stations on other lines within reasonable distance of the new stadium?
Did none of the media outlets pick up on this when the planning application went in?"Lol"
This stadium will be an expensive infrastructure disaster, with the local authorities compelled to fund solutions to numerous very obvious issues, rail being just one.
But none of that mattered. The previous "mayor" was an everton fan. The lump may not have given two hoots about the city, but... It is only by concerted effort that the taxpayer wasn't on the hook for the stadium itself (via a loan) never mind the necessary supporting infrastructure.
Don't worry though: Every penny will be charged to us in the Liverpool region, taking money out of the budget for worthwhile things.
It looks so close to the waterfront for this to be possible!Needs a ferry stop!
If there was suitable funding, the Sandhills site has space on either side to add extra flank platforms. This would allow the central platform to be used on quiet days, and a "Spanish solution" type setup to be used on event days.
As with all things it will come down to cost though.
Build a new platform to the east of the line for city bound, leaving the island for outbound trains with a fence against the city bound line for extra safety.
There is the reversing siding to the south so empty trains could be sent north. What is the capacity of a full and standing 777?
What a carbuncle....Liverpool Echo: The Bramley-Moore Dock plan to help deal with 'dangerous' transport problems - https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/bramley-moore-dock-plan-help-31046558![]()
Yes - Sandhills is open on Boxing Days.Presumably the "fanzone" is an off platform queueing area to manage that. And it being ugly hardly matters, the area is a post industrial dump of the highest order.
I could not be more opposed to suggestions that reduce interchange quality and accessibility 363* days a year purely for kickball once a week for half the year.
* Do the Boxing Day services stop there? I forget.
It looks like it was designed by M.C. Escher...Has that bridge been designed by a Reds supporter?
Better would probably be to buy some of the wasteland by the present entrance and operate a queueing system on matchdays for each destination as Chiltern does on matchdays.
It’s going to be bracing queuing up there in the winter!The Echo is reporting plans have been submitted for a new footbridge to 'increase the station's capacity' by providing a direct route from the new fanzone, and also to provide an additional emergency exit
route from the platform:
I reckon that’s too close - you need some distance to thin the crowd out.Would not two new platforms either side of Boundary Street, 500yards from the stadium
Bit cramped with residential below and right next doorMuch better would be a new station slightly further south, where the railway crosses the Leeds-Liverpool canal.
Wembley Stadium station has 2 separate and roomy platforms though, so is much more geared towards big crowds. And with the 2 separate platforms, you can divide people according to destination much more easily (not that many people are going the other way usually!)Re Chiltern Wembley Stadium. They have done exactly that. See this YouTube video by Mr drone UK
The Tens Streets already is the boho artistic area - it's all the people and businesses that got displaced from around Wolstenholme Square and the Baltic Triangle by property developers and gentrification (an artist friend who got booted out of his studio by Jamaica Street so the building could be redeveloped refers to the Baltic Triangle as the 'Pulled Pork and Beardwax Quarter', due to the middle class hipsters who took over the area). When Peel really kick off Liverpool Waters, the same thing will happen to to the Ten Streets area, and the current occupants of all those old warehouses will be chased out to another disused industrial zone even further out.Also great for the Ten Streets area which I believe is intended to become a boho artistic area.
Additional platforms have always been the answer in my view. A new station at Boundary Street which is right across the road from the stadium should have been built when the planning permission was granted. Indeed somewhere I have read for a new station to be built in the Vauxhall area between Moorfields and Sandhills but obviously our great Metro Mayor and his team have never taken this forward. It would have been the ideal solution.Would not two new platforms either side of Boundary Street, 500yards from the stadium, for match days only, be a better solution?
Football is an important economic activity on Merseyside and the stadium would certainly grow in frequency of use, beyond Everton home games.
It might even have a better passenger catchment area than Sandhills!
WAO
It may do, given the parking restrictions the council are bringing in. Vast swathes where no parking allowed from Queens Drive to the waterfrontWalking to and from Anfield and Goodison Park to the City Centre is a tried and tested activity every time there is a football match. And of course there are taxis and buses. I don't think Everton's move will lead to a major change in public transport usage.
Surely the railway makes a stack of money out of football fans crush loaded onto trains?As long as any additional platforms are funded by the developers of the kickball stadium and not from the public purse.