NotATrainspott
Established Member
- Joined
- 2 Feb 2013
- Messages
- 3,258
You've got to remember that the nature of Scottish political life is that a large chunk of the nation's elected representatives are from the more populous west central Scotland, while Edinburgh is the seat of the parliament and the executive.
Glasgow is also close enough to Edinburgh that many politicians will come through to Edinburgh for the day rather than having second homes / hotel stays.
So if you total up the relevant constituencies there are the best part of 35 Scottish Parliament Constituency members and 20 regional list members who will be using Class 385s to get to work. That is almost half of the parliament so naturally the Edinburgh - Glasgow route is much more politically noticeable than a similar 4tph 50 minute journey time route elsewhere in the UK.
Any individual route into London will only have a small number of politicians travelling onto it so nowhere else has quite the same political pressure as the E-G does.
Here's something to think about. How many ScotRail services don't call at Edinburgh Waverley, Glasgow Central or Glasgow Queen Street? Just the Far North and Inverness-Aberdeen trains? ScotRail is incredibly Central Belt-centric, because Scotland itself is. The number of trains which politicians and civil servants in Glasgow and Edinburgh would have to go out of their way to sample is tiny. The services they can't see is so comparatively small that it's not worth handling them that separately. In England there are plenty of trains which don't go anywhere near London, and they're almost always the ones which people complain about the most. Someone working in transport policymaking circles has really very little reason to go from one regional place to another, as London is the centre of their universe. They might have meetings in Manchester and in Leeds, but rarely without a trip back to Great Minster House in between.