Except that if you don't repaint the previous holder's corporate colours you will be giving them free advertising indefinitely.
Indeed this could be used to distort the franchising system because it gives the incumbents a significant advantage.
You're fond of dismissing inconveniently minor numbers as a "rounding error"... but you honestly think that the cost of repainting trains (over say a seven year franchise, bearing in mind that any cascaded or new trains will have to be repainted anyway) is going to make a "significant" advantage to one bidder over another?
There's no reason why the next franchise holder needs to completely change the entire livery - it's up to them if they want to retain the same base colour - e.g. look at how Arriva's XC was pretty much the same as the Virgin XC
It's a lick of paint and a new shirt every seven years - I'm not sure that it's going to break the bank.
(worth noting that Stagecoach are about to repaint all of their
buses, just like First and Arriva have brought in new bus liveries in recent years - these companies seem to understand that branding needs to be updated and freshened up every few years - even though there was no "franchise" requirement for them to spend their own money on these paint jobs/vinyls)
What on earth? It's 2020 for pity's sake, why the heck would anyone expect someone to wear a waistcoat in a job like working on the railway?
Yes, there are some staff at Northern who would benefit from taking rather more pride in their appearance. But, the uniform needs to be practical, visible, and comfortable.
Waistcosts, good lord... perhaps they should stock up on gas lanterns and brasso at the same time
True!
If's 2020 - I know that some people have this fixation on Victoriana but I'd rather have rail staff wearing something prominant/visible, probably something fairly "breathable" (given the working conditions, all the walking etc), something durable (in fact, so durable that each shirt can last
several franchises, if some of the spendthrifts on here are anything to go by!)
Worth contrasting this thread (and the idea that new shirts every seven years is the reason that ticket prices cost so much) with the "let's spend hundreds of millions of pounds on a brand new Northern fleet even though the existing stock has probably got another decade of life in it" thread. This forum is somewhere that people can believe that a shirt ought to have a longer lifespan than a DMU!