• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Snow Disruption 5/1/25-6/1/25

Status
Not open for further replies.

MCR247

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2008
Messages
9,940
Long Eaton to Derby, Nottingham to Grantham and Leicester to Peterborough all shut, combination of flood water and in the latter case day turn signallers unable to get to work around flooding.
Also issues on the ClC between Manchester and Liverpool via Warrington. The 0635 Nottingham - Liverpool is also stuck at Grindleford due to closed signal boxes. Odd as the first train an hour earlier got through with delay, although think it is now stuck at Oxford Road :lol:

It looks like the first Nottingham to Norwich via Oakham got through before that line shut!
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

londonmidland

Established Member
Joined
22 Dec 2009
Messages
2,033
Location
Leicester
Lots of flooding across the East Midlands this morning. We had torrential rain all night last night, as well as snow melt this morning.

Flooding at Hinckley as well.

The image below shows the signalling map for south of Leicester, with four trains stuck behind each other at red signals.IMG_3994.jpeg
 

MCR247

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2008
Messages
9,940
Also issues on the ClC between Manchester and Liverpool via Warrington. The 0635 Nottingham - Liverpool is also stuck at Grindleford due to closed signal boxes. Odd as the first train an hour earlier got through with delay, although think it is now stuck at Oxford Road :lol:

It looks like the first Nottingham to Norwich via Oakham got through before that line shut!
The 0635 Nottingham - Liverpool got cancelled at Grindleford after about an hour with the train to return to Nottingham after completing a shiny move requiring everyone to get off onto a snowy/icy platform and head over the bridge to the other platform. Passengers anxious to get to Manchester told by the very apologetic guard and driver that as far as they know there’s no trains to Manchester and control gave told them to bring everyone back to Chesterfield. The train performs its shunt, everyone onboard off we go back through Totley Tunnel for a few minutes until we get to a red signal. Turns out we had to wait for the next Liverpool bound train to clear the single line section that is Dore West Curve. You can imagine the looks on some of the passengers faces rubber necking to watch that 170 fly past! Turns out the lines open again! If only we’d been told that before re boarding at Grindleford. Especially as the following following Liverpool train is cancelled :lol: You couldn’t make it up really!
 

AY1975

Established Member
Joined
14 Dec 2016
Messages
1,946
A WCRC 37 reached Sheffield and is now heading back over the Hope Valley

View attachment 172251

(WCRC loco changing directions in the tunnel at Sheffield Station)

I’m awaiting a Lincoln service on 1B but a Transpennine Service is also due on 1B.

I'm guessing that it was 0Z37 (https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:45810/2025-01-05/detailed). Real Time Trains doesn't seem to give the loco number but the Class37.co.uk site appears to have it as 37516: https://www.class37.co.uk/2025/2501work.aspx
 
Last edited:

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
8,972
Location
West Riding
Do you know which 37 it was?

I'm guessing that it was 0Z37 (https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:45810/2025-01-05/detailed) but unfortunately Real Time Trains doesn't seem to give the loco number and nor do any other real time train running sites or apps as far as I can see.
I’m sorry, disappointingly that was as close to the station as it got and I couldn’t ID it.

Edit: Looks to have been 37516 according to a Buxton and High Peak Railways facebook page photo.
 

eastwestdivide

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2009
Messages
2,896
Location
S Yorks, usually
The usual spot for flooding at Rotherham Road, 1130ish. Water coming out of the culvert and pooling beside the railway, both sides of the lines, but still snow on the tracks themselves. With 2 inches of slushy snow around, I can only see it getting worse before it gets better.

General view, culvert sump on the left:
IMG_8466.jpeg

Closeup of the sump from the canal towpath:
IMG_8468.jpeg
 

dannypye9999

Member
Joined
28 Jun 2013
Messages
392
Since the general message today is "stay at home and do not travel unless necessary" can we get a refund on advance tickets?
 
Joined
19 Jul 2023
Messages
174
Location
Milton Keynes
#83 Yes but how many schools nowadays have caretakers - and most of the teachers will be driving perhaps 15-20 miles to get to the school and it can't open with not enough staff on site.

That's assuming the school that the teacher's children go to is open, too, else teacher may need to stay home to look after the children.

Life was less complicated when I went to school, rain, hail or snow :)
 

deltic

Established Member
Joined
8 Feb 2010
Messages
3,482
The 0635 Nottingham - Liverpool got cancelled at Grindleford after about an hour with the train to return to Nottingham after completing a shiny move requiring everyone to get off onto a snowy/icy platform and head over the bridge to the other platform. Passengers anxious to get to Manchester told by the very apologetic guard and driver that as far as they know there’s no trains to Manchester and control gave told them to bring everyone back to Chesterfield. The train performs its shunt, everyone onboard off we go back through Totley Tunnel for a few minutes until we get to a red signal. Turns out we had to wait for the next Liverpool bound train to clear the single line section that is Dore West Curve. You can imagine the looks on some of the passengers faces rubber necking to watch that 170 fly past! Turns out the lines open again! If only we’d been told that before re boarding at Grindleford. Especially as the following following Liverpool train is cancelled :lol: You couldn’t make it up really!
What is the logic of making people detrain? This seems a classic case of risks not being fully assessed against each other.
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
8,184
What is the logic of making people detrain? This seems a classic case of risks not being fully assessed against each other.
It's a shunt signal to crossover in that direction, passengers aren't allowed on board. Maybe dispensation could have been granted in the circumstances, maybe not.
 

deltic

Established Member
Joined
8 Feb 2010
Messages
3,482
It's a shunt signal to crossover in that direction, passengers aren't allowed on board. Maybe dispensation could have been granted in the circumstances, maybe not.
The question is what is the risk of remaining on board against the risk of detraining etc and was this considered?
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
16,715
The question is what is the risk of remaining on board against the risk of detraining etc and was this considered?
Plenty of risk around slippery/icy surfaces when crossing over to the other platform. That feels like a far bigger risk than staying on board during a shunting manoeuvre. But I bet the railway doesn’t think like that.
 

D6130

Established Member
Joined
12 Jan 2021
Messages
7,230
Location
West Yorkshire/Tuscany
The question is what is the risk of remaining on board against the risk of detraining etc and was this considered?
If the crossover points are not fitted with facing point locks the passage of trains carrying passengers is absolutely forbidden without them being clipped and padlocked by an authorised person (Mobile Operations Manager, Permanent Way Supervisor, etc.) This is to prevent the possibility of the points moving under the train and causing a derailment which could kill or injure people. Unfortunately, in the current weather conditions it could take a suitable person hours to reach the site. In these circumstances I think the necessity to detrain and make their way over the footbridge was a comparatively minor inconvenience for the passengers.
 
Last edited:

deltic

Established Member
Joined
8 Feb 2010
Messages
3,482
If the crossover points are not fitted with facing point locks the passage of trains carrying passengers is absolutely forbidden without them being clipped and padlocked by an authorised person (Mobile Operations Manager, Permanent Way Supervisor, etc.) This is to prevent the possibility of the points moving under the train and causing a derailment which could kill or injure people. Unfortunately, in the current weather conditions it could take a suitable person hours to reach the site, In these circumstances I think the necessity to detrain and make their way over the footbridge was a comparatively minor inconvenience for the passengers.
Its highly unlikely a slow speed derailment will kill anyone. If the train derails then you have a platform full of people stuck in the cold in a relatively remote area waiting for rescue where access roads may also be difficult to traverse. It may be safer for them to be on a derailed train. There is then the risk of detraining people some of whom maybe relatively immobile and getting them across to the other platform.

There are various risks here - its not clear what the least risk approach is and whether it has been taken in this instance.
 

Midland Man

Member
Joined
10 Jun 2017
Messages
33
If the crossover points are not fitted with facing point locks the passage of trains carrying passengers is absolutely forbidden without them being clipped and padlocked by an authorised person (Mobile Operations Manager, Permanent Way Supervisor, etc.) This is to prevent the possibility of the points moving under the train and causing a derailment which could kill or injure people. Unfortunately, in the current weather conditions it could take a suitable person hours to reach the site. In these circumstances I think the necessity to detrain and make their way over the footbridge was a comparatively minor inconvenience for the passengers.
Clipped and scotched for a facing move (not padlocked unless the rule has recently changed). A passenger train may not proceed on the authority of Shunt signal without signaller's permission- unless that's changed since I retired!
 

PG

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
3,237
Location
at the end of the high and low roads
There is then the risk of detraining people some of whom maybe relatively immobile and getting them across to the other platform.
Surely those same people will have, indeed desire, to get off the train when they reach their destinations and thus be undertaking a similar risk?

If they end up stuck on a derailed train they may well have to exit trackside which has many risks too.
 

D6130

Established Member
Joined
12 Jan 2021
Messages
7,230
Location
West Yorkshire/Tuscany
Clipped and scotched for a facing move (not padlocked unless the rule has recently changed). A passenger train may not proceed on the authority of Shunt signal without signaller's permission- unless that's changed since I retired!
Happy to bow to your superior knowledge. I retired - as a driver - nearly thirteen years ago and my memory is not what it once was. :(

If they end up stuck on a derailed train they may well have to exit trackside which has many risks too.
....not to mention the line being blocked in both directions for the rest of the day - and quite possibly longer.
 

Belperpete

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2018
Messages
2,395
What is the logic of making people detrain? This seems a classic case of risks not being fully assessed against each other.
How snowy and icy does it have to be before the risks of people using a footbridge override the risks of a derailment? Do you have to consider the number and mobility of people on the train? And likewise those who might get stranded on other trains when a derailed train blocks the line.

If you are expecting someone to assess the overall risks of each individual situation, then you are going to need to get someone with sufficient experience and authority to site to do that. How long would you be prepared to wait for them to get there? Bearing in mind the number of situations they are likely to be dealing with.

Remember that the rule book was written because of the catastrophic consequences of allowing staff to use their common sense.
 

Class15

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2021
Messages
2,966
Location
North London or Mildmay line
Peterborough to Leicester shut. Big delays to freight trains as they are now having to use already scarce capacity on GEML/NLL. Bad for the Norwich trains as well with freight being put right in front of them at Ipswich (see 4M29 and 1P29). Not totally sure why 4M29 could not have just waited 5 minutes for 1P29 to clear the line. Not a great day.

EDIT:
1P29 - https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:G27392/2025-01-06/detailed

4M29 - https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:46174/2025-01-06/detailed
 

LAX54

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2008
Messages
3,865
Its highly unlikely a slow speed derailment will kill anyone. If the train derails then you have a platform full of people stuck in the cold in a relatively remote area waiting for rescue where access roads may also be difficult to traverse. It may be safer for them to be on a derailed train. There is then the risk of detraining people some of whom maybe relatively immobile and getting them across to the other platform.

There are various risks here - its not clear what the least risk approach is and whether it has been taken in this instance.
The Rules are there, and no one will override them from a remote location, the Signaller if he made the move with passengers on, could well be drug screened, suspended (for months) pending investigation.
IF they have point locks and you have a locked reverse detection and a GPL, then maybe with a clear understanding with the driver the move would be made.
IF the train did derail even at low speed, then they are trapped on the train, would have to detrain and walk along the ballast to the station,


Peterborough to Leicester shut. Big delays to freight trains as they are now having to use already scarce capacity on GEML/NLL. Bad for the Norwich trains as well with freight being put right in front of them at Ipswich (see 4M29 and 1P29). Not totally sure why 4M29 could not have just waited 5 minutes for 1P29 to clear the line. Not a great day.

EDIT:
1P29 - https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:G27392/2025-01-06/detailed

4M29 - https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:46174/2025-01-06/detailed
Looks like 4M29 was right time through Ipswich, as was 1P29.
 
Last edited:

Class15

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2021
Messages
2,966
Location
North London or Mildmay line
Looks like 4M29 was right time through Ipswich, as was 1P29.
In that case it would appear to be a planning error - a freight should not be let out 5 minutes before an express passenger train. I guess it’s because the freight was a VSTP. Of course, 1P29 would have to overtake 4M29 somewhere for the schedules to work, but was not booked to do so.
 

LAX54

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2008
Messages
3,865
In that case it would appear to be a planning error - a freight should not be let out 5 minutes before an express passenger train. I guess it’s because the freight was a VSTP. Of course, 1P29 would have to overtake 4M29 somewhere for the schedules to work, but was not booked to do so.
VSTP's never seem to work, however when I was in the box at Colchester, some of the WTT freights were at times just as bad anyway ! Planners seem to overlook the fact that freights are a lot longer and heavier now than even 6 or 7 years ago ! takes time to get up to 75mph, and from Ipswich its uphill to Bentley.
 

66701GBRF

Member
Joined
3 Jun 2017
Messages
804
In that case it would appear to be a planning error - a freight should not be let out 5 minutes before an express passenger train. I guess it’s because the freight was a VSTP. Of course, 1P29 would have to overtake 4M29 somewhere for the schedules to work, but was not booked to do so.
Maybe waiting an extra 5 minutes would have put it in more of a conflict with other services in other areas of the route. Maybe it would have knocked onto 4M88 which is booked to pass Ipswich at 1114.
 

Donny Dave

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2005
Messages
5,350
Location
Doncaster
Lots of delays on the ECML currently, I'm not sure if this is a knock on effect from the weekends weather, but there is signalling problems on various routes, with delays of 60 minutes + being shown on the departure boards at Doncaster.
 

Shaw S Hunter

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2016
Messages
3,229
Location
Over The Hill
Remember that the rule book was written because of the catastrophic consequences of allowing staff to use their common sense.
Although it's easy to be irritated by the extent of risk averseness that exists today this point really does need to be made from time to time. Another way that this is expressed on the railway is to say that the Rule Book was/is written in blood.
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
5,214
Did i see that the Darlington > Bishop Auckland line was closed yesterday due to snow?
Shut until about 1400ish, which makes me think it may of been signaller issue rather than snow (although maybe not as they ran an Ecs 5D06 1124 Bishop Auckland to Darlington which ran 23 late, I can’t see what that arrived in at Bishop unless was a route prover)
The first passenger service to run was 2D11 1354 Darlington to Bishop Auckland.

In Aycliffe it was about 4 inches deep.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
31,059
Location
Fenny Stratford
Shut until about 1400ish, which makes me think it may of been signaller issue rather than snow (although maybe not as they ran an Ecs 5D06 1124 Bishop Auckland to Darlington which ran 23 late, I can’t see what that arrived in at Bishop unless was a route prover)
The first passenger service to run was 2D11 1354 Darlington to Bishop Auckland.

In Aycliffe it was about 4 inches deep.
thanks - my mum reported the same the other side of Darlo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top