Bletchleyite
Veteran Member
DRT being demand responsive transport...?
That's the one yes, sorry, post edited.
DRT being demand responsive transport...?
I believe through ticketing is unlikely due to stagecoach not operating the trains. Also Great Northern serve CMB.I'm strongly in favour of this. It should run all day timed to connect in and out of the Liverpool Street trains that terminate/start at Cambridge North.
But the key feature needs to be through ticketing that lets bus passengers use the trains between Cambridge North, Cambridge and Cambridge South.
It would then also be of use to Biomedical Campus commuters, Papworth outpatients and Hills Road and Long Road sixth form college students, having a 10 minute train ride across Cambridge instead of being stuck in Cambridge traffic.
The opening of Cambridge South station will be the ideal time to launch this.
As someone who spent 90 minutes on the A today between Histon and Addenbrookes, I can't help but agree.I'm strongly in favour of this. It should run all day timed to connect in and out of the Liverpool Street trains that terminate/start at Cambridge North.
But the key feature needs to be through ticketing that lets bus passengers use the trains between Cambridge North, Cambridge and Cambridge South.
It would then also be of use to Biomedical Campus commuters, Papworth outpatients and Hills Road and Long Road sixth form college students, having a 10 minute train ride across Cambridge instead of being stuck in Cambridge traffic.
The opening of Cambridge South station will be the ideal time to launch this.
I'm not sure reliable timetables are possible, given the variablity of Cambridge congestion, not to mention very variable dwell times. The only way would be to add an absurd amount of slack into the timetable.Also a single fare is £2 or £1 for u25s and negate the need to pay for the train. I agree the traffic is bad and stagecoach should produce timetables they can reliably run to and CPCA should improve congestion (easier said than done).
It isn't a matter for Stagecoach. The Cambridge and Peterborough Combined Authority should take the lead but there's no evidence that they are even aware of the opportunity that Cambridge South opens up for improving public transport in Cambridge. If Andy Burnham can do what he is doing in Manchester then, Nik Johnson. or his successor, can do something, on a much smaller scale, in Cambridge.I believe through ticketing is unlikely due to stagecoach not operating the trains. Also Great Northern serve CMB.
If the bus stays on the busway then the risk to punctuality for the bus is very small.I believe that passengers have a negative perception of public transport performance and so timed bus-train connections may be missed due lack of punctuality.
I agree the traffic is bad and stagecoach should produce timetables they can reliably run to
I'm not sure reliable timetables are possible, given the variablity of Cambridge congestion, not to mention very variable dwell times.
That has already happened. Look at evening peak timetables on various routes. A knock on effect of increased slack is reduced frequency.The only way would be to add an absurd amount of slack into the timetable.
Yesterday was a classic example of weather related congestion. When there is heavy rain in Cambridge there is a big modal shift from cycling to buses and cars.As someone who spent 90 minutes on the A today between Histon and Addenbrookes, I can't help but agree.
On Sunday, October 27th, we're making changes to some of our services in Bedfordshire, Hertfordshire, and Cambridgeshire
These changes are designed to improve connectivity and punctuality by expanding services, increasing frequency, and adjusting timetables.
Why should Stagecoach invest when they may not have a business there with franchising.No one is willing to take the risk on buses these days.Controversial opinion perhaps, but given that the Busway must be among Stagecoach East's most successful routes, maybe they should just put their hand in their pocket and not rely on CAPCA to pay them to run a half decent service?
Why should Stagecoach invest when they may not have a business there with franchising.No one is willing to take the risk on buses these days.
The Cambus-liveried MMC 10802 was parked in Peterborough bus station yesterday, for no obvious reason.
A bus company is celebrating serving part of the East of England for 40 years.
Stagecoast East began life in 1984 as Cambus, which is still the legal name for the company running its buses Cambridgeshire and Peterborough.
To mark the anniversary, parties have been held for staff at its three Cambridgeshire depots - Cambridge, Fenstanton, and Peterborough - as well as its depot in Bedford.
[...]
Meanwhile a meeting of the Council’s Rural Affairs Committee on Monday evening received the much anticipated “Bus Services: Review of Rural Funded Provision” report which recommended the following:
Service 25: Bedford – Harrold – Hinwick or Souldrop/Knotting – Wymington – Rushden
• Much of the requirement between Harrold, Carlton, Pavenham and Bedford, will be met by the Grant Palmer commercial service. Therefore, it would be possible to procure a more limited service to fill the gaps around the commercial service, either times or to serve those villages not otherwise served. This would optimise the number of vehicles required from 2 to 1 over current arrangements.
• There may also be scope to work with North Northamptonshire Council to jointly provide a service covering the Wymington area.
This encouraging confirms the wasteful competition will be coming to an end and Grant Palmer’s commercial initiative with route 25 can continue to prosper. And who knows, if the company is successful in gaining the tender for the one bus operating journeys to Rushden the service might end up integrated together again.