• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Steel Sleepers

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ploughman

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2010
Messages
2,976
Location
Near where the 3 ridings meet
Metronets version was assembled at York at the same works as the Jarvis ones but was dedicated for use on Metronet tracks. It is similar in operation but not the same I understand.

The ex Jarvis ones that still survive, I believe, are owned by a separate finance company to the rest and as such missed the scrapyard.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Joined
14 Aug 2012
Messages
1,070
Location
Stratford
I believe the Kings Lynn to Middleton Tower line is steels, but the line is freight only single track with two/four workings a day
 

Jona26

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2013
Messages
273
Location
West Sussex
For information, steel sleepers are banned on third rail lines. They are also easier to transport than concrete, being much lighter and also "stackable" if they do not have rails attached.

Pardon my ignorance but are concrete sleepers that carry 3rd rail electrification longer than those on overhead electrified or non-electrified lines?

I only ask as steel sleepers have recently been installed on parts of Wrexham to Bidston line. So if 3rd rail electrification does ever go ahead here would re-sleepering have been needed anyway or have the costs just been increased by installing steel?
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
31,946
Pardon my ignorance but are concrete sleepers that carry 3rd rail electrification longer than those on overhead electrified or non-electrified lines?

I only ask as steel sleepers have recently been installed on parts of Wrexham to Bidston line. So if 3rd rail electrification does ever go ahead here would re-sleepering have been needed anyway or have the costs just been increased by installing steel?

Not longer, but they are fatter, and less deep. At least when you put new ones in on 3R routes. You really don't want steel! There's quite a few between Wokingham and Ash also.
 

RPM

Established Member
Joined
24 Sep 2009
Messages
1,497
Location
Buckinghamshire
One thing that steel sleepers aren't compatible with is the Chiltern Line ATP loops. Several stretches of relatively new steel sleepers had to be replaced with concrete during the Evergreen 2 project because new signals were put in in areas that had recently been relaid with steel sleepered track.
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
8,111
Location
Leeds
Am I imagining it or did I once read something about third rail electrification of Bidston-Wrexham being ruled out because it had a lot of steel sleepers?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top