I wouldn’t say so. But shutting the town (and bus station) side of Woking station would be a big deal. The entrances/exits get crowded enough as it is.
-
Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
SWR to withdraw public access to Guildford Station Footbridge
- Thread starter BenS123
- Start date
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R
RailUK Forums
It is possible they had less pavement works needed compared to Guildford. Also the area inside the booking hall is bigger than the back of Guildford station.
I'm just trying to understand the differences that led to the diffeerent approaches.
Someone commented that space might be needed to replace the ticket machines. If you magnify the new pic you can see the machines aren't all that huge unless they're very deep into the wall at the back. Think of the cash machines in your local building society. They're not huge.
The problem is that if you want to run over a significant number of people in one go you'd just drive at the bus queue on the opposite side of Guildford Park Road which is often quite long with people travelling up to the hospital. I do remember the attack on Glasgow Airport in 2010. It was pretty horrific in its planning and execution. Maybe Network Rail has been advised of a specific threat, but as someone said the gap is large enough to drive a truck through, so what's the point of what's been done?
I must say that when I walk acros Waterloo Bridge I feel reassured by the lumps of concrete keeping vehicles safely off the pavement!
The problem is that if you want to run over a significant number of people in one go you'd just drive at the bus queue on the opposite side of Guildford Park Road which is often quite long with people travelling up to the hospital. I do remember the attack on Glasgow Airport in 2010. It was pretty horrific in its planning and execution. Maybe Network Rail has been advised of a specific threat, but as someone said the gap is large enough to drive a truck through, so what's the point of what's been done?
I must say that when I walk acros Waterloo Bridge I feel reassured by the lumps of concrete keeping vehicles safely off the pavement!
Its a fair point that Woking opens onto a wider pavement with no through traffic, and then a semi pedestrianised road. Not a narrow pavement onto a busy road that doesn't allow for mucking about much where people come in and leave.
Guildford Park Road entrance closed again from 25 May to 5 June as bollards are installed.
Perhaps this is the remaining ones.
After this perhaps they can still some at the bus stop opposite, where people wait.
I wonder if the work will finish earlier than the time alloted, with the footbridge closed for the reminder of the time, whilst no work is done?
Or will they better be able to maych the time required to do the work with the closure period Last time they finished 4 days early and the footbridge remained closed for the remaining 4 days.
This time they finish on a Wednesday but I don't know the amount of work required and whether they are still assuming the same pro rata length of time.
I wonder if there will be any more closures after this?
The details on the Web site are:
www.networkrail.co.uk
The poster at the station didn't explain why the entrance was closes but did have a link to the Web site, which fortunately did explain why. Here is an image of the poster.
Perhaps this is the remaining ones.
After this perhaps they can still some at the bus stop opposite, where people wait.
I wonder if the work will finish earlier than the time alloted, with the footbridge closed for the reminder of the time, whilst no work is done?
Or will they better be able to maych the time required to do the work with the closure period Last time they finished 4 days early and the footbridge remained closed for the remaining 4 days.
This time they finish on a Wednesday but I don't know the amount of work required and whether they are still assuming the same pro rata length of time.
I wonder if there will be any more closures after this?
The details on the Web site are:
Guildford - Facilities, Shops and Parking Information
www.networkrail.co.uk
The poster at the station didn't explain why the entrance was closes but did have a link to the Web site, which fortunately did explain why. Here is an image of the poster.
I've seen the letter Network Rail has sent to those it calls "Railway Neighbours". In essence the explanation for the closure of access to the station and traffic lights etc on Guildford Park Road is to "complete" the work they started some weeks ago. They don't actually explain why the work couldn't have been completed in the time but, as infobleep has pointed out, there was in fact time remaining in the previous closure when nothing was happening. But they'd already excavated the pavement for the bollards which are now to be installed. Never mind, they did a lovely job of filling it all in again.
And on the subject of a permanent closure of the bridge over the station (because of mass anti-social behaviour and thousands of fare evaders getting on and off at Guildford) it's all gone a bit quiet. Anyone know why?
And on the subject of a permanent closure of the bridge over the station (because of mass anti-social behaviour and thousands of fare evaders getting on and off at Guildford) it's all gone a bit quiet. Anyone know why?
Fazaar1889
Member
They have cameras on their lanyards now, so that might be one reason...
I hadn't noticed. I do hope that helps.
Going past I studied the bollards and there are 4 installed and space for 4 more.
If the amount of work required is the same, then they have alloted less time to do the work this time.
I hadn't noticed cameras on lanyards either but I'll have a look when I cross the station bridge on my way into town later on.
Nothing NR does would surprise me so if they've allocated less time for the same amount of work that would be par for the course. What I find surprising is that they're content to repeatedly block up Guildford Park Road with lights when it's the principal route to and from the A3 to the town.
Nothing NR does would surprise me so if they've allocated less time for the same amount of work that would be par for the course. What I find surprising is that they're content to repeatedly block up Guildford Park Road with lights when it's the principal route to and from the A3 to the town.
It may have been that Surrey CC wouldn't allow them the full time for traffic management for the whole job to be done at once and needed to be split across two periods of work.
Fazaar1889
Member
That seems the most likely. The works to create the zebra crossing at the top of the chase infuriated the NIMBYs so I'm sure that the council got 1001 complaints for that. The local facebook group was fun to watch during that time.
You'd think NR would let people know that further work was due later in the year.
I received a 'Railway Neighbours' letter but had already seen the notice on Gfd Park Rd entrance, its makes some sort of sense, - I had joked with the rail staff about leaving enough space to drive a 7.5 tonne truck through, it fell on deaf ears with the temp/agency staff!
I visited Woking station yesterday and noticed that they have had the 'anti terrorist bollards' installed, presumably there is a budget and an installation timetable, would love to know which stations have been prioritised as high/low risk?
I notice that car drivers still pick-up/drop off by the shops just west of the station entrance, also the current layout of bus stops/traffic islands means that all traffic comes to a stop when a bus pulls up, overtaking is now physically impossible, this must be intentional.
The mostly temporary rail staff will open the gates without bothering to physically check if you have a valid ticket, presumably to avoid conflict.
That might help the anti-social behaviour somewhat, but probably won't do much to stop fare evaders