T163R
Member
Hi there,
As some of you already know, I've been to UK this summer. I've been to various cities, including Glasgow. So I tested the Glasgow Subway, which I won't qualify as useless, but...
Well what's a decent subway system without a station in Queen Street or Central ? I know there are two subway stations near QS and GC, but I only remember walking 20 minutes in pouring rain to link the subway to GC.
Also, I remember walking 40 minutes from Glasgow Docks to Cessnock, and looking for the Cessnock station for 10 or more minutes. Finding a Glasgow Subway station is hellish.
So SPT is happy enough to say it's one of the oldest subway systems in the world, but it's certainly not the most useful IMO. The line doesn't even go through the city centre (except at some places like Buchanan Street).
I can understand that the line was done to bring people from the suburbs to the city centre, but if the line was reliable enough, it would need more than 3 cars per train and it would have less empty seats.
Debate open.
As some of you already know, I've been to UK this summer. I've been to various cities, including Glasgow. So I tested the Glasgow Subway, which I won't qualify as useless, but...
Well what's a decent subway system without a station in Queen Street or Central ? I know there are two subway stations near QS and GC, but I only remember walking 20 minutes in pouring rain to link the subway to GC.
Also, I remember walking 40 minutes from Glasgow Docks to Cessnock, and looking for the Cessnock station for 10 or more minutes. Finding a Glasgow Subway station is hellish.
So SPT is happy enough to say it's one of the oldest subway systems in the world, but it's certainly not the most useful IMO. The line doesn't even go through the city centre (except at some places like Buchanan Street).
I can understand that the line was done to bring people from the suburbs to the city centre, but if the line was reliable enough, it would need more than 3 cars per train and it would have less empty seats.
Debate open.