Tetchytyke
Veteran Member
Please don't take this as an endorsement of Corbyn.If you're so convinced Corbyn wasn't as unpopular as Starmer is now, then why did his leadership lead to the worst election defeat since 1935?
But in 2019, the "worst election defeat since 1935", Corbyn actually got more votes (10.1M) than Starmer did in 2024 (9.7M).
The reason why Starmer won is quite simply that the Conservative vote collapsed: from 13.9M in 2019 to 6.7M in 2024.
The trouble was that Corbyn stacked up the votes in seats Labour was always going to win.
But the fact that all general elections are ultimately decided by the population in about 50 swing seats is, quite frankly, why this country has gone to the dogs. FPTP is a complete joke of a voting system.
Starmer played the game a lot better though: Labour won Hendon by 15 votes, won Poole by 18 votes, won North West Cambridgeshire by 40 votes, and even Wes Streeting only won by 500 votes.
At the time, I thought nice sensible Centrist Dad Starmer would be best.Perhaps you could, succinctly, set out who you think SHOULD be PM and why you think that?
Now? Starmer seems to have pretty much abandoned nice sensible Centrist Dad and has lurched quite a long way off to the right. Pretty much everything he promised in the leadership election has been binned at the altar of "pragmatic government". Well, he says pragmatic government, I say "karaoke Farage".
None of this is helped by his key aide, Morgan McSweeney, who is as deeply sinister and, quite frankly, odd as Dominic Cummings ever was.
Last edited: