https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...dical-evidence-finally-caught-Lucy-Letby.html mentions X-rays taken at the time:One thing that really puzzles me. At the trial it was stated that she killed the first baby by injecting air into the veinous system. That could only have been determined by post-mortem examination, not years later when a criminal investigation started.
So if that was known at the time, why wasn't it immediately obvious that there had been a deliberate act that had led to that death and an investigation started then?
My understanding is that the presence of an air embolism isn't definitive proof foul play has occurred. A mistake with an IV could potentially introduce air into the blood system. Though that would also be potentially something that needed investigating if staff performance wasn't up to standard.In two of the cases, Baby A and Baby E, X-rays taken shortly before they died revealed air bubbles in major arteries or veins.
The problem with an investigation after the first death is that as far as I can tell most of the evidence is cumulative, Letby was the only person on the ward during every death.