That would be a long wait. The track remodelling at Neville Hill is not due to be done until 2028, according to the Modern Railways article I summarised in #7868.Last time I went on the leeds to york line, there was piling works done but not has many between micklefield and church fenton, probably waiting til neville hill depot is done before they electrify the rest of the line.
BrilliantNoticed today piling work seems to have started between Micklefield and Garforth.
I just came to say the same thing. Noticed piles in compound last week and in the ground today.Noticed today piling work seems to have started between Micklefield and Garforth.
Ta!
Yes, it’s been loud overnight on Tuesday and Wednesday night this week. (I live a stones throw from east Garforth)Noticed today piling work seems to have started between Micklefield and Garforth.
Very safe to say that boots are on the ground and shovel ready which pleases the hell out of me.Theres a very large looking crane now in place where the new viaduct is being built near Ravensthorpe as well. Looks to be some sort of structures on the ground nesr the crane, ready to be moved but couldn't quite see what it was.
Likewise. Lots happening now!Very safe to say that boots are on the ground and shovel ready which pleases the hell out of me.
From Monday 24 June to Friday 19 July, the TRU team delivered upgrades to the railway between Huddersfield and Leeds. The work is part of the Transpennine Route Upgrade, a multi-billion-pound programme that will bring customers faster, greener and more reliable trains between Manchester, Huddersfield, Leeds and York.
TRU engineers worked around the clock to complete the work, which included the renewal of 1.5km of track, drainage work across 500m of railway, and the recovery of 3.4km of redundant cable, whilst a number of different ground surveys also took place.
...
Throughout August, services through Huddersfield will be affected each weekend, excluding the Bank Holiday (24-25 August) up to Sunday 1 September. This is while we carry out major upgrades at Huddersfield Station, taking passengers one step closer to a station truly fit for the 21st century.
Press release
![]()
TRU extends thanks to passengers following four weeks of upgrades
Rail passengers experiencing longer journey times between Huddersfield and Leeds over recent weeks are being thanked for their patience by the Transpennine Route Upgrade (TRU).www.networkrailmediacentre.co.uk
The restoration of Huddersfield’s existing trainshed station roof will now commence to preserve the structure, with this being one of the few remaining ‘Euston Roof’ examples on the operational railway today.
The town’s Grade I listed station is undergoing a full redesign with the construction of new and longer platforms, with additional track to enable more trains with extra seats to stop there.
The Transpennine Route Upgrade (TRU) has made significant progress with major rail improvements in Huddersfield as part of the multi-billion-pound project – a programme of works that will bring passengers faster, greener and more reliable trains between Manchester, Huddersfield, Leeds and York.
Mining mitigation work has been completed throughout the area in recent months, whilst strengthening work has been undertaken to Huddersfield Viaduct in advance of new track being installed.
Work has also begun to carefully dismantle the station’s listed tearoom. This will be stored while the platform remodelling takes place, before being re-painted and reinstated at the station later on.
The TRU team will be working around the clock during several weekend line closures in August, with diversionary routes and rail replacement buses keeping passengers on the move.
Looks nice, lets hope it stays that way.A few pictures of the new Access for all Footbridge now open at Garforth, no lifts installed as of yet
They had revenue inspection officers on the footbridge today preventing access to the bridge without a ticket. I know the road bridge has a footpath on one side but I would’ve thought the footbridge was a right of way across the station.A few pictures of the new Access for all Footbridge now open at Garforth, no lifts installed as of yet
A few pictures of the new Access for all Footbridge now open at Garforth, no lifts installed as of yet
It's not marked as such on footpathmap.co.ukI would’ve thought the footbridge was a right of way across the station.
Shouldn't have called it an "Access for All" bridge then if they're going to start wanting tickets to cross it!It's not marked as such on footpathmap.co.uk
Fair point!Shouldn't have called it an "Access for All" bridge then if they're going to start wanting tickets to cross it!
Although not unknown, station footbridges being Public Rights of Way is very much the exception than the norm, I thought? I don't see why a new footbridge would automatically become one even if it could easily be used as such. However I also don't see any particular reason for Northern or NR to want to be overly obstructive about the bridge in the long run. From a more practical point of view it's a shame to see the bridge not be provided with a roof.I know the road bridge has a footpath on one side but I would’ve thought the footbridge was a right of way across the station.
That's not what is meant by "Access for All" in the context of making the railway accessible to Persons of Reduced Mobility (PRM).Shouldn't have called it an "Access for All" bridge then if they're going to start wanting tickets to cross it!
A station footbridge is only likely to be a right of way if one existed at that point before the railway came into existence - Sheffield & Guildford being prime examples. If it can only be accessed from the platforms there almost no chance of it being one, and the occasional revenue block should be enough to ensure it doesn't become one by default.It's not marked as such on footpathmap.co.uk
If the access from the road to both platforms is already so convenient that it's easier to use both access routes and two lifts than the public road, then it was a bit of a waste of money putting in an access-for-all footbridge in the first place. It's not like anybody actually needs to get from one platform to another at Garforth anyway.It may be the case that this bridge is easier for PRM to use than the adjacent road bridge, in which case it would be reasonable to allow use by unticketed individuals.
No, but it is necessary to get from the ticket office on the Leeds-bound platform, to the York/Selby-bound platform. Even if the road bridge is technically accessible (which you'll notice is not the point I was making above) expecting ticket holders with mobility issues to take the longer route would not be ideal.If the access from the road to both platforms is already so convenient that it's easier to use both access routes and two lifts than the public road, then it was a bit of a waste of money putting in an access-for-all footbridge in the first place. It's not like anybody actually needs to get from one platform to another at Garforth anyway.
Pic attached of the old footbridge at Garforth showing the route from the road down on to platform 1: most certainly not providing access for all!If the access from the road to both platforms is already so convenient that it's easier to use both access routes and two lifts than the public road, then it was a bit of a waste of money putting in an access-for-all footbridge in the first place. It's not like anybody actually needs to get from one platform to another at Garforth anyway.
Neither myself nor @takno were suggesting that the old footbridge was accessible. The discussion was whether the adjacent road bridge would provide an accessible route.Pic attached of the old footbridge at Garforth showing the route from the road down on to platform 1: most certainly not providing access for all!
View attachment 162379
That was not my reading of @takno’s post, but I’m happy to be corrected by them. The old footbridge included stepped access from the road bridge down to platform 1, as I’m sure you are aware, with no other way of accessing the platform other than by going over the footbridgeNeither myself nor @takno were suggesting that the old footbridge was accessible. The discussion was whether the adjacent road bridge would provide an accessible route.
If the access from the road to both platforms is already so convenient