• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Trivia: “Oxbow Lake” service numbers

Status
Not open for further replies.

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
17,882
Location
Reston City Centre
What examples are there of modern bus routes that have a route number that once made a lot of sense but now stands out as a bit of an oddity?

Some networks have a nice and simple numbering system, with no oddities. The Xplore Dundee routes are all between 1-33 (ignoring School services/ tenders), nice and easy to remember. Other than the 100 to the Airport, Lothian Buses got things down to 1-49 (before their adventures into East/ West Lothian, and creation of the 200/300/400 for the suburban Airport routes).

But in other places, there’s one or two routes that have a number that made sense in the past but all the other routes have been renumbered, leaving them a bit out on their own.

Is there a town where all routes have numbers under fifty apart from one that is numbered in the nineties? Or a route like the 37A which retains its suffix even though there’s no 37?

For example, here in Sheffield, at deregulation, long distance bus routes generally used to be the “two hundred and something”. But over the years they’ve either been given an “x” (the 277/278 to Doncaster became the X78, the 205/216 etc to Dinnington became the X5) or lower numbers (the 238/239 to Penistone is now the 29, the 265/271 to Barnsley/ Wombwell is now the 2/2A, the 201/202/203 to Chesterfield is now the 43/44) or withdrawn as long distance/ cross boundary services became uneconomic (the 287 to Maltby, the 258 to Thorpe Hesley, the 240 to Bakewell, the 251/252 to Killamarsh). This leaves the 272 (Sheffield to Castleton) as a bit of an oddity, the one remaining long distance route that kept its number (there are a handful of other routes into the Peak District like the 218 to Chatsworth and the 256/257/258 towards Ladybower but these are “new” numbers, I’m only talking about long established unchanged route numbers here)

Similarly, in the late 1980s, local independent “sut” numbered most of their routes 1X0, so the 100 was City - Darnell, the 120 was City - Crystal Peaks, the 130 was City - Herdings. After they were bought by SYT, Yorkshire Terrier picked up some of the routes (although the 100 became the easier to remember 10), and over the years the 120 was slowly extended further west, so that by the time Stagecoach took over Yorkshire Traction (owners of ‘Terrier), the 120 was a flagship route (with a 123 paralleling much of it). So successful was the western link to the University/ Hallamshire Hospital that Mainline/ First tried a number of things to compete directly (extending the 41 cross city, renumbering the long established 60 to create a 40/41/42/44/49 cross city corridor) until First decided that “if you can’t beat them, join them” and withdrew their own services to run all east-west buses as the 120. Today, the two operators co-ordinate (“bus partnership”) and the 120 is the most frequent single service in Sheffield, but a bit of an oddity in a city where all other city routes have much lower numbers, and a number tinkered with in recent years to make Barnsley Road services single digit

A few years ago in Fife the St. Andrews - Leuchars - Tayport - Dundee service was the 42, which stuck out like a sore thumb given that other services from St Andrews to Leuchars were the 92/94/99 (and the 95/ 97/ 98 being other St Andrews routes). In organised 1980s Fife, forty-something numbers used to be for the triangle in between Leven/ Kirkcaldy/ Glenrothes (Windygates/ Markinch area), so the 40 was Kirkcaldy- Markinch- Cupar, the 41/46 were Kirkcaldy - Windygates - Cupar - Wormit - Dundee, the 43/47 were Leven - Windygates - Markinch - Glenrothes, the 45 was Leven - Windygates - Stratheden, the 48/49 were a Leven - Windygates circular). But around 1990 the 53 which ran Cupar -Tayport- Dundee was renumbered 42 to tie in with the 41/46 from Cupar to Dundee. Then, later, the 41/46 truncated at Cupar with the 42 increased in frequency to maintain the Cupar - Dundee frequency (nothing via Wormit). Changes on the St Andrews - Dundee corridor saw the frequency via Tayport reduced (more buses running direct instead) and the 42 became coordinated with the 96 (St Andrews - Tayport -Dundee). Then, to highlight the similar nature of the routes, the 96 was renumbered 42A. Until the time when the 42 was replaced by a faster Cupar- Dundee route that avoided Tayport, and the St Andrews 42A renumbered 42, meaning that it had no connection to any of the other forty-something services, but inherited the number through a series of changes over the years

Twixt Tyne and Wear, the Stagecoach services linking their urban networks in South Shields and Sunderland are the E1/E2/E6. At first glance that seems strange because neither the South Shields nor Sunderland networks use prefixes (other than a couple of “x” routes that are express). There’s not a 1/2/6 operated by Stagecoach in South Shields or Sunderland. But it’s the legacy of these being run by/ inherited from “Economic”, who started all of their services with an “E”. Not something your average Punter might realise in 2022.

What other routes appear to have unusual/ non- sequential numbers (but there’s a historic reason)? Is there a town that embraced the late ‘80s fad for changing all local routes to single letters, where everything has gone back to a proper number apart from the “C”? Or where a short route is the six hundred and something because it was once a cross border service, now truncated to a shadow of its former self?

TL;DR version: Oxbow lakes are former bends in rivers, where the river has taken a faster course over time, leaving a partly dried up/ stagnant pool behind. What examples are there of bus routes that once made sense as part of a logical network but now seem peculiar (because everything else around them has changed)?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Dai Corner

Established Member
Joined
20 Jul 2015
Messages
6,353
Bristol Omnibus Co 'Country' routes radiating from Bristol used to be numbered 3xx. The only two remaining ones are the 349 to Keynsham and 376 to Wells.
 

Flange Squeal

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2012
Messages
1,265
Stagecoach in Hants & Surrey overhauled their commercial Blackwater Valley network (Aldershot, Farnborough, Camberley area on the Hampshire/Surrey border) in Spring 2003, simplifying services on some overlapping corridors, and numbering those newly created - and renumbering some existing - services to create a new lower series of routes. The 24 was merged with 1, the 21/22/32/36/42 merged into new 2, the 49/50 merged into new 3, the 12 became 6, and the 23 became 7. Over the following 5 years batches of new Darts and then Solos arrived. The Darts initially had simple 'route 1' and 'route 3' branding, but the arrival of the Solos fairly soon after saw a new theme primarily based around children's toys being launched across several routes:
  • 2 was 'Marbles' - "Rolling around..."
  • 3 was '3 Little Wishes' - not sure exactly, Aladdin?
  • 4/5 was 'Connect 4&5' - largely common route and talked of links offered
  • 6 was 'YoYo' - "Up and down every 10 mins" on a circular
  • 15 was 'Scoot' - "I scoot into town"
  • 20 was 'Kite' - "Take off to a greener future"
As time went on, the 6 and (a few years later) the 20 both had their registrations revised to change the actual service numbers to YOYO and KITE respectively, however the other routes continued with their route numbers and on-vehicle branding. By 2018 though, the KITE's branded vehicles left to go on a new University contract in Guildford and all but the YOYO had pretty much lost their branding by now too. The pandemic then saw the YOYO revised so longer vehicles could be used at a lower frequency, so while the branding remained on the vehicles the route has largely been in the hands of unbranded vehicles for the last 2.5 years.

Therefore the local Blackwater Valley Stagecoach numbering sequence run out of Aldershot depot now consists of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, YOYO, 7, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, KITE, 41, with the two routes placed here where their 6 and 20 numbers would fit in quite nicely now looking somewhat random - particularly as they've been run with unbranded vehicles for so long now. That said after 2.5yrs the YOYO is back to its pre-pandemic routing as of today, so might get briefly reunited with its branded vehicles before they get repainted, but the KITE will continue being a mere route number as it has been for four years now.
 

150249

Member
Joined
13 Dec 2021
Messages
880
Location
Exeter
I'm not sure if it counts but Stagecoach South West have recently replaced the classic 4A/4B Exeter - Axminster/Honiton with the 44/44A which doesn't aline with anything. Closest route number with SSW is the 55

Another is the 55/55A/55B/155. There were talks of changing it back to the 3/3A/3B with the 55A being scrapped but the plans never went ahead.


SSW route numbers have always been strange. The 1 and 2 have always been the same I think but the 3 was changed to the 55/55A/55B/155. The 4/4A/4B has turned into the 4/44/44A. A while ago, the 5/5A/5B/5C was the 50/51/52. The 6/6A used to be 9/X9 then 10/10A. The 7 used to be X46. The 9 used to be 52A/52B/52C iirc.

Another example that I have just thought of is the 99E in Exmouth which is particularly odd considering there has never been a 99/A/B/C/D.
 
Last edited:

Andyh82

Established Member
Joined
19 May 2014
Messages
3,539
In Cornwall, the U1, U2, U4 are numbered based on the previous “U Lines” Falmouth University network that has been disbanded, and each service now comes under a different brand
 

32625

Member
Joined
10 Jul 2022
Messages
32
Location
UK
Also in Cornwall, the 515 from Gwithian to Penzance by Go Cornwall Bus retains the 5 prefix from when it was run by Western Greyhound. Also, the 223 and 236 around Launceston retain their Group Travel number and the 425 from Launceston to Altarnun and North Petherwin by Go Cornwall keeps its Summercourt Travel number and the 128, 217, 218 and 219 around Bude also keep their kind of out of sequence numbers. Some routes were renumbered in 2020, when Transport For Cornwall happened, like the 8 from Penzance to St Just was the 409, the 23 and 28 from St Austell to Gorran Haven and Lostwithiel respectively were the 423 and 428 and the 33 from St Keverne to Helston was the 323 and the 42 from Camborne to Falmouth was the 442 to name but a few. So, it seems that some were renumbered, while others were not.
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,096
Also in Cornwall, the 515 from Gwithian to Penzance by Go Cornwall Bus retains the 5 prefix from when it was run by Western Greyhound.
It does, but in the period between Western Greyhound's collapse and the start of GCB it continued to be operated by Travel Cornwall using that 515 number, whereas the routes taken on by First were renumbered almost straightaway.
 

32625

Member
Joined
10 Jul 2022
Messages
32
Location
UK
It does, but in the period between Western Greyhound's collapse and the start of GCB it continued to be operated by Travel Cornwall using that 515 number, whereas the routes taken on by First were renumbered almost straightaway.
Yes, it was by Age UK, I thought, I kind of was surprised it didn’t become the 15 when Go Cornwall took it on
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,096
Yes, it was by Age UK, I thought, I kind of was surprised it didn’t become the 15 when Go Cornwall took it on
You're right, it was what is now the 8 that was operated by Travel Cornwall. I wonder whether there was some doubt as to whether Go Cornwall was going to take on the 515.
 
Last edited:

roadierway77

Member
Joined
23 Jun 2019
Messages
361
Location
Edinburgh
McGill's Buses used to have a set of express routes numbered 901-908. I believe these were:

901 - Glasgow to Largs via Gourock
902 - Greenock to Glasgow Airport
903 - Glasgow to Balloch via Braehead
904 - Paisley to Largs
905 - Glasgow to Stirling via Erskine and Balloch
906 - Glasgow to Largs via Branchton
907 - Glasgow to Dunoon
908 - Glasgow to Largs via Braehead

Today, only the 901, 904 and 906 survive - the most recent to be cut was the 907 in 2019
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
20,043
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
When United Auto was the operator in Scarborough, the routes were numbered between 100 and 125. The 104 to Evelyn Drive, the 121 to Hull as examples, now the 20 and 12 respectively. The 109 number was the sea front service and is now used by Shoreline in their competitive route (and they run a 108 apparently) though East Yorkshire (United's successor) operates an S115 to Ravenscar which was the 115 in the past.

The only other service with a similar number is the 128 to Helmsley. However, it only got that number because historically, the service ran from Ripon to Scarborough and it was numbered in the Ripon area series (126 to 161) where a few are still numbered in that series.
 

Andyh82

Established Member
Joined
19 May 2014
Messages
3,539
When United Auto was the operator in Scarborough, the routes were numbered between 100 and 125. The 104 to Evelyn Drive, the 121 to Hull as examples, now the 20 and 12 respectively. The 109 number was the sea front service and is now used by Shoreline in their competitive route (and they run a 108 apparently) though East Yorkshire (United's successor) operates an S115 to Ravenscar which was the 115 in the past.

The only other service with a similar number is the 128 to Helmsley. However, it only got that number because historically, the service ran from Ripon to Scarborough and it was numbered in the Ripon area series (126 to 161) where a few are still numbered in that series.
The Scarborough seafront service being the ‘109’ is a good one

I believe the 115 still actually is the 115, despite sometimes being referred to as the S115 in online timetables etc. Perhaps it clashed with a 115 in Hull?
 

Springs Branch

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2013
Messages
1,429
Location
Where my keyboard has no £ key
Most of Northern’s NW Durham routes were in a 7** series from the 1970s. Peter Huntley swept those away but a few persist as they had been tendered like the 773
Similarly in the industrial towns circling Manchester - in the 1970s Selnec, then Greater Manchester PTE re-numbered* most of the former municipal / LUT / North Western routes in the area on a geographical basis.

So, there were local routes in Rochdale generally in the 450-ish series, Bury in the high 400s, Bolton in the low 500s, Leigh in the high 500s and former Wigan Corporation local routes in the 600s.

Taking Wigan as an example of more recent changes, many of the busier inter-town service numbers have been simplified since privatisation (e.g. former Wigan-Leigh 554 is now 9, Wigan-Bolton formerly 540 is now 7, Wigan-Ashton in Makerfield, was 601 now part of the 10).

But there's around a half-dozen basically local services in the town still numbered in the 600-series, plus a good few longer-distance ones in the 300s (e.g. 320, 352, 362, 375) which are legacies from Ribble's South Lancashire route numbering scheme from way back before I was born (and I'm in my seventh decade)


* - there's a story (probably true) that when the two heavyweight rivals Manchester City Transport and Salford City Transport were consolidated into the PTE in the early 1970s, Manchester was allowed to retain its fleet numbers (Manchester having by far the largest no. of buses) but had to renumber duplicate service numbers (e.g. the 92 became the 192). Salford on the other hand got to keep its service numbers but had to renumber its buses.
 
Last edited:

Statto

Established Member
Joined
8 Feb 2011
Messages
3,218
Location
At home or at the pub
In Cheshire theirs an X30 Chester to Warrington, the X30 was originally numbered C30 (which was part of the historic numbering from Crosville's alpha system), think it got renumbered to X30 during the North Western, Warrington Transport bus wars, when Warrington launched their own version numbered 30X, rather than C30, so North Western renumbered the C30 to X30, keeping it numbered X30 doesn't make any sense as it serves all stops on the route.
 

318266

Member
Joined
30 Sep 2017
Messages
585
Location
The Land of the E12
McGill's Buses used to have a set of express routes numbered 901-908. I believe these were:

901 - Glasgow to Largs via Gourock
902 - Greenock to Glasgow Airport
903 - Glasgow to Balloch via Braehead
904 - Paisley to Largs
905 - Glasgow to Stirling via Erskine and Balloch
906 - Glasgow to Largs via Branchton
907 - Glasgow to Dunoon
908 - Glasgow to Largs via Braehead

Today, only the 901, 904 and 906 survive - the most recent to be cut was the 907 in 2019
The amount of times this has changed over the years...

902 was extended to Paisley at some point, then much later became the CapitalFlyer day return bus (Gourock to Edinburgh via Paisley summer service with branded Levantes!)
903 became a short lived Greenock - Wemyss Bay via IBM, which ran not far from the 906 and puzzled me as to its existance.
904 was once a Helensburgh - Glasgow via Braehead service

On the topic of McGill's, the X6A is an evening/Sunday tendered non-express service. For some reason it has been given the old number of a Johnstone - Glasgow via Houston/Linwood express, also numbered X6A

McGill's have never ran an X6. It is numbered in relation to the old First bus that ran the same route as the X6A up to Bridge of Weir. There was also an X6K I believe to Kilmacolm?
 

PTR 444

Established Member
Joined
22 Aug 2019
Messages
2,284
Location
Wimborne
For a long time, Winchester had a route 6A but no 6. The 6 was changed to “Spring” about a decade ago, leaving a gap between routes 5 and 7. The 6A has since disappeared altogether with the 95 to Micheldever now covering its route. Winchester also has no route 2 so the sequence today goes 1, 3, 4, 5, Spring, 7.
 

Statto

Established Member
Joined
8 Feb 2011
Messages
3,218
Location
At home or at the pub
Arriva after buying MTL, made a whole network review including renumbering some routes, as Merseyside still had the old corporation number systems for the routes, unlike other PTEs, Merseyside PTE never changed the numbers.

So Arriva changed the Wirral area routes to 400 series, which is ok as 400 numbers were used by MTL for Wirral area Cross River routes, but every other company kept the old number system, so it looks odd, Stagecoach operate 1, X1 which goes Cross River, all other Cross River routes, including Stagecoach are in the 400 series.

Then other side of things Arriva routes that operate solely in Wirral show 400 numbers, whilst other operators still have the old number system.
 

WibbleWobble

Member
Joined
19 Aug 2022
Messages
250
Location
Down south
former Wigan-Leigh 554
554 was the Lancashire United numbering, it became 658 under GMT through GMB, GMN and First until Stagecoach changed it. A lot of LUT routes were renumbered (54x were originallallocated to the Bolton - Walkden corridor!).

So had GMT not renumbered the ex-LUT services, there could have been an element of out of place route numbers there!
 

rg177

Established Member
Associate Staff
International Transport
Joined
22 Dec 2013
Messages
3,725
Location
Newcastle-upon-Tyne
Buses north of the river Tyne used to generally be numbered in the 3xx series across Arriva and Go North East (and their predecessors).

This has gradually eroded away but buses down the Coast Road corridor have become a fairly uniform 306/308/309/310/311.

The 317 was also resurrected under a Nexus contract recently, having been changed to the 17 and subsequently the 11 in the past decade or so.
 

RELL6L

Member
Joined
19 May 2014
Messages
985
How about the 280 between Oxford and Aylesbury. Back in the 1970s City of Oxford had a very complex although logical numbering system with the 280 being Aylesbury to Oxford to Kidlington. I think the 280 is the only route left from this, albeit with a different operator and truncated at Oxford. The 260 survived until relatively recently too.
 

PaulWC

Member
Joined
15 May 2017
Messages
60
In Cheshire theirs an X30 Chester to Warrington, the X30 was originally numbered C30 (which was part of the historic numbering from Crosville's alpha system), think it got renumbered to X30 during the North Western, Warrington Transport bus wars, when Warrington launched their own version numbered 30X, rather than C30, so North Western renumbered the C30 to X30, keeping it numbered X30 doesn't make any sense as it serves all stops on the route.

It was in 1996 went it got changed to the X30 when it was branded as a 'City Express' route - this was when North Western were using multiple brands such as Runcorn Busways, Warrington Goldline etc. As you say though, it's not an express route.

In Cheshire at least none of the old alpha prefixed numbers remain, although many still retain numbers similar to those used minus the prefix. As recently as 2016, when Routemaster of Nantwich ran a Crewe to Chester bus for a short while, they numbered it the C84 just as the old Crosville number was.
 

NorthOxonian

Established Member
Associate Staff
Buses & Coaches
Joined
5 Jul 2018
Messages
1,487
Location
Oxford/Newcastle
How about the 280 between Oxford and Aylesbury. Back in the 1970s City of Oxford had a very complex although logical numbering system with the 280 being Aylesbury to Oxford to Kidlington. I think the 280 is the only route left from this, albeit with a different operator and truncated at Oxford. The 260 survived until relatively recently too.
Was the 275 (Oxford to High Wycombe, 3-4 journeys per day) part of that pattern? That has a similarly high number and similar-ish destination/direction.
 

Ianigsy

Member
Joined
12 May 2015
Messages
1,112
Arriva after buying MTL, made a whole network review including renumbering some routes, as Merseyside still had the old corporation number systems for the routes, unlike other PTEs, Merseyside PTE never changed the numbers.

So Arriva changed the Wirral area routes to 400 series, which is ok as 400 numbers were used by MTL for Wirral area Cross River routes, but every other company kept the old number system, so it looks odd, Stagecoach operate 1, X1 which goes Cross River, all other Cross River routes, including Stagecoach are in the 400 series.

Then other side of things Arriva routes that operate solely in Wirral show 400 numbers, whilst other operators still have the old number system.
From what I remember of growing up in Birkenhead in the 1980s, the 4xx Wirral numbers originally began at deregulation. Prior to this, the only cross-river service was the New Brighton-Liverpool 31, which became the 431. At deregulation, the bus operators were able to compete with Merseyrail so you had a lot more routes from Bromborough, Heswall, West Kirby etc.

I don’t think Merseyside ever really felt the need for a wholesale renumbering because there wasn’t that much duplication to begin with. You had five municipal operators, Crosville, Ribble and Lancashire United/Greater Manchester. Of those operators, Birkenhead and Wallasey already had a joint numbering system of sorts and Southport had a small self-contained network with Ribble providing the out-of-town services. Liverpool Corporation provided services to quite a large part of what became Knowsley and the Bootle end of Sefton as well and had a couple of joint numbers with St Helens. Crosville’s numbering system meant that everything operating in Merseyside was prefixed by C, F or H and I seem to recall the Ribble route numbers being in the 200s and 300s.
 

RELL6L

Member
Joined
19 May 2014
Messages
985
Was the 275 (Oxford to High Wycombe, 3-4 journeys per day) part of that pattern? That has a similarly high number and similar-ish destination/direction.
I don’t think so. At this time the 290 covered the main road route from Oxford to High Wycombe every two hours, then continued to London. Not sure when the 275 came in.
 

Simon75

On Moderation
Joined
25 May 2016
Messages
895
Crosville had letter prefixes for different areas

Eg
C Chester
E Northwich/Macclesfield
K Crewe/Congleton

First Essex has the following since April 2022
S Colchester Town services
C Chelmsford
B Basildon
 

Cambus731

Member
Joined
19 Jul 2013
Messages
1,121
Eastern National from 1955 (I think) decided that the Chelmsford area routes would be numbered 40 - 59. These numbers were generally used on Chelmsford town routes but also on some interurban routes such as the 46 to Ongar, 53 to Clacton (later cut back to Colchester) and the 59 to Harlow.
The 53 was renumbered 71 in 1995 when its route out of Chelmsford was diverted via Chelmer Village and the 59 is now operated by Arriva from their Harlow depot. And EN's successor, First Essex recently recast all their commercially operated city routes in Chelmsford and numbered them C1, C2 etc.
This now leaves the 'oxbow lake' cross Chelmsford City service of the 47 which is operated under contract to the council. And arguably the 46 to Ongar.
Also the Sundays services 42A to Bishops Stortford and the 42B to Halstead.
 
Last edited:

Stephen1001

Member
Joined
7 May 2020
Messages
74
Location
Cheltenham
Various renumberings at Stagecoach in East Kent have left no survivors from the East Kent Road Car system of the 1980s where lots of routes were numbered in the 600s (to avoid duplication with Maidstone & District numbers during an era of common management). Except one - the 666 between Faversham and Ashford, which passed to independent Kent Coach Tours shortly after deregulation and thus kept its number. It was more recently run by Regent Coaches before returning to Stagecoach in 2015, and is now a complete oddity among their other routes.
 

MotCO

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
4,132
Twixt Tyne and Wear, the Stagecoach services linking their urban networks in South Shields and Sunderland are the E1/E2/E6. At first glance that seems strange because neither the South Shields nor Sunderland networks use prefixes (other than a couple of “x” routes that are express). There’s not a 1/2/6 operated by Stagecoach in South Shields or Sunderland. But it’s the legacy of these being run by/ inherited from “Economic”, who started all of their services with an “E”. Not something your average Punter might realise in 2022.
I always wondered where the 'E' came from. Now if that had been Yorkshire...:D

Further examples are the 'R' routes in Orpington. It was numbered after the first operator of the network (Roundabout), rather than after the town, since you can't really have 'O' routes.
 

rg177

Established Member
Associate Staff
International Transport
Joined
22 Dec 2013
Messages
3,725
Location
Newcastle-upon-Tyne
Twixt Tyne and Wear, the Stagecoach services linking their urban networks in South Shields and Sunderland are the E1/E2/E6. At first glance that seems strange because neither the South Shields nor Sunderland networks use prefixes (other than a couple of “x” routes that are express). There’s not a 1/2/6 operated by Stagecoach in South Shields or Sunderland.
There actually are a 1 and 2 in South Shields. See: https://bustimes.org/services/1-south-shields-town-centre-biddick-hall-estate?calendar=2992329 for an example.

Bizarrely for such low-numbered routes, rather than being anything major, they're essentially early morning weekend circular services that mop up the contents of several daytime routes. That's been the case for quite a few years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top