Trivia: Which UK stations have (or have historically) had stations using the same name but with a slight variation?

[Bertone]

HATCH END
Opened as “Pinner” in the 1840’s
Renamed as “Pinner and Hatch End” in 1897
Renamed as “Hatch End for Pinner” in 1920
Renamed as just “Hatch End” in 1956.

 

[swt_passenger]

The OP mentioned his emphasis was on ‘spin off’ stations, I don’t think a simple renaming, or duplicate names in other parts of the country have anything to do with his original question?

 

[Magdalia]

Gloucester Central and Gloucester Eastgate were renamed as one station "Gloucester" from 26th May 1968, seven years before the closure of the Gloucester Eastgate part in 1975.

Gloucester Eastgate and Central are shown with separate names in the public timetables up to and including 1975.

 

[Mcr Warrior]

The OP mentioned his emphasis was on ‘spin off’ stations, I don’t think a simple renaming, or duplicate names in other parts of the country have anything to do with his original question?

@swt_passenger. Are you of the opinion that it might, perhaps, be useful for the thread title to be tweaked so as to clarify this point?

 

[Mat17]

The OP mentioned his emphasis was on ‘spin off’ stations, I don’t think a simple renaming, or duplicate names in other parts of the country have anything to do with his original question?

I think I misunderstood the criteria as well.

 

[generalnerd]

The OP mentioned his emphasis was on ‘spin off’ stations, I don’t think a simple renaming, or duplicate names in other parts of the country have anything to do with his original question?

Yeah that would be correct. I can’t think of anything to change to title to though, suggestions are welcome.

I’d also welcome stations that are one station officially but but are infra-structurally/operationally separate (st Pancras Thameslink and victoria being two separate terminals) but that’s a whole other can of worms…

 

[Rail Ranger]

Gloucester Eastgate and Central are shown with separate names in the public timetables up to and including 1975.

It's explained in this article: http://www.disused-stations.org.uk/g/gloucester_eastgate/index.shtml
Note that the running in boards on the disused Gloucester Eastgate platforms just say "Gloucester".

 

[SargeNpton]

Yeah that would be correct. I can’t think of anything to change to title to though, suggestions are welcome.

I’d also welcome stations that are one station officially but but are infra-structurally/operationally separate (st Pancras Thameslink and victoria being two separate terminals) but that’s a whole other can of worms…

St Pancras is three stations operationally: The Thameslink low-level platforms, the EMR platforms and the Southeastern and Eurostar platforms for HS1. Some other dual operation stations that spring to mind: London Bridge, Tamworth, Lichfield Trent Valley, Liverpool Lime Street, Retford, Reading, Liverpool Street, Farringdon, Paddington, Whitechapel.

 

[generalnerd]

St Pancras is three stations operationally: The Thameslink low-level platforms, the EMR platforms and the Southeastern and Eurostar platforms for HS1. Some other dual operation stations that spring to mind: London Bridge, Tamworth, Lichfield Trent Valley, Liverpool Lime Street, Retford, Reading, Liverpool Street, Farringdon, Paddington, Whitechapel.

Out of interest, how is London Bridge two stations?

 

[Howardh]

There are quite a few locations where names have been simplified where only one station now remains. Wolverhampton is no longer High Level now that Low Level is no more for example. Conversely "London" has been added at some stage to the names of most of the various London termini at some stage (London Bridge excepted of course). Understandably this addition has not been mirrored in the names on the Underground.

Bolton had two - Trinity St and Moor Lane, but after the closure of Moor Lane, the "Trinity Street" part became irrelevant. As you say, that must happen a lot - example Bury had "Knowsley St" and (I think) "Bolton St".

 

[Rail Ranger]

The "other" station in Bolton was Great Moor Street.

 

[Mcr Warrior]

Out of interest, how is London Bridge two stations?

Historically, in Victorian times, it was essentially two stations, located side-by-side. One handling the South Eastern Railway's traffic and the other The London Brighton & South Coast Railway.

 

[Rescars]

Waterloo had the separate Eurostar platforms for a while. And to what extent should Waterloo East be considered separate from the main station? I have alwys assumed that its platforms are lettered rather than numbered to help prevent passenger confusion.

 

[zwk500]

St Pancras is three stations operationally: The Thameslink low-level platforms, the EMR platforms and the Southeastern and Eurostar platforms for HS1.

4 operationally, the Eurostar and SE platforms are as operationally separate as stations as any of the others. You can't put trains for one set of platform into the other.

Some other dual operation stations that spring to mind: London Bridge, Tamworth, Lichfield Trent Valley, Liverpool Lime Street, Retford, Reading, Liverpool Street, Farringdon, Paddington, Whitechapel.

Also London Vic (2) and Clapham Junction (up to 4 depending on how you define it)

Out of interest, how is London Bridge two stations?

From a routing perspective it's now pretty much 4, with the 3 cannon street platforms, 2 thameslink platforms, 4 Charing Cross platforms and then the 5 terminating platforms, however as there is a certain amount of interlocking possible between the 3 sets of through platform it's generally left as the Brighton/Sussex/Terminating side and the kent/Eastern/through side.

 

[generalnerd]

Waterloo had the separate Eurostar platforms for a while. And to what extent should Waterloo East be considered separate from the main station? I have alwys assumed that its platforms are lettered rather than numbered to help prevent passenger confusion.

That’s what the thread is about (kind of)

I would say it’s separate as it has a different name, but then I class stations that share a name but are vastly different from the main station.

I class 13 and 14 at Manchester Piccadilly as being a separate station (it certainly feels it anyway!) considering how separate it feels from the main station

 

[ANDREW_D_WEBB]

Waterloo had the separate Eurostar platforms for a while. And to what extent should Waterloo East be considered separate from the main station? I have alwys assumed that its platforms are lettered rather than numbered to help prevent passenger confusion.

Suspect the platform letters at Waterloo East are required by the emergency services to avoid confusion in the event of an emergency. The emergency services have a say in deciding things like street names to avoid confusion arising.

One station that has changed its name slightly is Hanwell. Originally Hanwell and Elthorne, which is still on some of the hertiage nameboards at the station.

 

[CaptainHaddock]

Penrith and Oxenholme seem to get rebranded every now and then to indicate their proximity to the Lake District, presumably to foreign tourists.

I think that currently they're known as "Penrith North Lakes" and "Oxenholme Lake District", according to their station signs.

 

[Birkonian]

I understand the OP but still worth mentioning that Bebington and New Ferry was shortened to Bebington some years ago. Locals just call it Beb.

 

[Mcr Warrior]

I class 13 and 14 at Manchester Piccadilly as being a separate station (it certainly feels it anyway!) considering how separate it feels from the main station

You may well do, but they (platforms 13 + 14) are very much part of the Manchester Piccadilly station complex, albeit, very clearly an add-on to the main (terminus) part of the station.