Fully agree - and yet this was the Managing Director who presided over recruiting yet more corporate management, while culling at the operational level.
Worse still, the quality of some of those corporate appointments seems to have been quite appalling; recruiting some who appear to be pure self-publicists (quite in the Virgin mould) and who have presided over service regressions entirely at odds with the Virgin rhetoric that many have ‘fallen for’ over the years.
I wrote the above in terms of my own perception of this aspect of Virgin Trains East Coast, but a couple of other things also occur to me reading other posters’ thoughts.
Firstly, the performance of the Virgin Trains East Coast management team is, until 23rd June, entirely that company’s right to accept and its responsibility to manage. LNER is in no position (whatever LNER currently is) to publicly announce that specific posts will or will not exist, before it has a) taken over and b) followed due-process.
Secondly and connectedly, it’s standard practice in corporate takeover situations, especially hostile ones (and I’d suggest that, in some ways, this is more like a hostile private takeover than simply a contract handover) to let the message throughout be that it’s ‘business as usual’.
This tends to work for both sides, keeping the ship steady, trying not to prejudice employment law and union agreement positions.
Others here will have, I’m sure, specific knowledge and expertise in this regard.
Once the takeover has occurred, strategy settled upon, performance assessed and budgets agreed, then the new ‘owner’ can start the processes required to deal with ongoing operations. They’ll do this with an eye on PR usually, too. Job losses are always a horror for the affected individuals, and regularly have a negative impact on consumer opinion when they’re reported widely.
What the business owner can also do is, immediately but not before the taking over, decide that some operations may not continue. So, on the 25th June, LNER could announce (say) that Nectar is being terminated, not replaced and the ‘loyalty’ function closed down.
The positions would become redundant and they’d go through the statutory processes, looking at alternative employment opportunities etc.
They shouldn’t and couldn’t say that before the takeover, so for now that means that unless an individual resigns in the meantime, everyone is staying.
That doesn’t mean a thing when it comes to a few weeks or months down the line, however.