• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Virgin Voyager Coach VS MK3

Status
Not open for further replies.

43034 The Black Horse

Established Member
Joined
2 Dec 2007
Messages
1,270
I personally do not like IC70 seats. At 6'3"+, they just aren't high enough to provide decent support. I get on fine with just about anything else (as long as it has enough padding, *cough* Central Trains' 158s), but Meridians are wonderful.

I'm lucky enough to not get that problem, being around the 6ft area-ish. If I do, i'll happily put up with it. But I suppose,there is no point traveling on them if they're not comfy to you.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

WillPS

Established Member
Joined
18 Nov 2008
Messages
2,428
Location
Nottingham
I'm lucky enough to not get that problem, being around the 6ft area-ish. If I do, i'll happily put up with it. But I suppose,there is no point traveling on them if they're not comfy to you.
I do travel on them occasionally, usually doing Nottingham - Sheffield on one of the evening Leeds runs. There is, undoubtedly, something very special about traveling on them, a bit of railway magic that Multiples can't provide.

I'd also say there's something special about traveling on Multiples with opening windows though - I like to be able to hear the train as it traverses the track.
 

steve099

Member
Joined
10 May 2009
Messages
56
Having not travelled with Wrexham & Shropshire in a while and taking only Arriva 158s or LM 170s into New Street, it occured to me when in an Mk3 just how quiet - and smooth - the journey was in comparison. That was ultimately something I didn't realise would be of such great importance.

And so specifically versus the Voyager, I really don't know. I'm not a great fan of the Voyager versus the Pendolino, but ultimately a 'stock' (old-fashioned) W&S Mk3 loses to a modern and generally more pleasant Voyager coach interior.
 

boing_uk

Member
Joined
18 May 2009
Messages
619
Location
Blackburn
The thing with any carriage though is the noise from the power plant underneath... I travel often between Blackpool and Blackburn and Ive been on a 185 with an engine off and I have to say that the ride is comparable to a Mk3.

Then again, I like firm seats, which is something that a 185 can provide... though not great for sleeping on I have discovered.

Back in 2002, when commuting twixt Leeds and Wakefield I much preferred travelling in the (as then) new Mallard MkIV's to the MkIII's. Having said that, I do find that the 180's are just a MkIII with an engine underneath.

The one thing I have found though is the distinct noisiness of the Perkins engined 158s compared to the Cummins variety; the latter being the quieter of the two.

If only Northern had the capacity within the frnachise to refurb their units.... :(
 

SuperVoyager

Member
Joined
8 Mar 2008
Messages
185
Location
Fife
Having just done Birmingham International to London Euston on the "City of Edinburgh" Pendolino, I have to say it was quite comfy and relaxing in Std Class (Coach A)...

Yeah Pendolino's are much better than MK3's.

And im sure there will be a post in a minute or so saying something about the windows...:roll:
 

devon_metro

Established Member
Joined
11 Oct 2005
Messages
7,715
Location
London
It doesn't justify how a mk3 can be worse. I try my upmost not to travel on Virgin designed trains, so in my case Voyagers. The Xc HSTs are excellent in the South West. A sensible amoun of seats, tables, toilets. Not to mention the excellent window alignment ;)
 

37372

Member
Joined
24 Jul 2006
Messages
587
Location
Mexborough
Mk3s are great pieces of rolling stock, the seats are so much more comfortable than voyager seats, the ride is smoother and quieter, and inside they don't smell of faeces!
 

SuperVoyager

Member
Joined
8 Mar 2008
Messages
185
Location
Fife
It doesn't justify how a mk3 can be worse. I try my upmost not to travel on Virgin designed trains, so in my case Voyagers. The Xc HSTs are excellent in the South West. A sensible amoun of seats, tables, toilets. Not to mention the excellent window alignment ;)
I agree that XC's MK3's are better than FGW... But still like Voyager's more
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
On a Serious Note...

MK3's: Say an elderly person with bad joints was getting off at the next stop... and coulden't bend around the open the door from the outside and there was no help around.
Doors quite narrow aswell.
Also the aisle's are very narrow to walk down or take baggage down. Quite an inconvineience.
Also toilets have very limited room and a small door, have seen elderly people struggling to get in the door and sometimes the "1!" Disabled fair space toilet in not working


Voyager: Nice wide automatic exterior doors make getting on and off easy for all travellers. Aisle's are a bit wider than Mk3's so makes walking down alot easier.
Toilets facillitys are nice and roomy so disabled and elderly persons can access them easily. At seat service Drinks and Light refreshments means that you do not have to pace up and down the train trying to frind the shop.
 
Last edited:

Jordy

Established Member
Joined
9 Jun 2005
Messages
8,465
Location
WCML South
MK3's: Say an elderly person with bad joints was getting off at the next stop... and coulden't bend around the open the door from the outside and there was no help around.

Maybe, but you don't have to do much 'bending' to put your hand out of a window, still more difficult than pressing a button admittedly, but there is usually a member of staff (or a member of the public who will open the door for you!) nearby

Doors quite narrow aswell.

I don't think they're much different than Voyagers tbh

Also the aisle's are very narrow to walk down or take baggage down. Quite an inconvineience.

Again, I think Voyagers are pretty much the same! Plus large items of baggage should be placed in the luggage racks, not taken down the isles and given a seat

Also toilets have very limited room and a small door, have seen elderly people struggling to get in the door

I've never seen elderly people struggle to open and enter a MK3 toilet, I have however seen them have difficulty with the several push buttons you're presented with when you enter a Voyager toilet!

and sometimes the "1!" Disabled fair space toilet in not working

This is pretty irrelevant, down to maintenance not the coach design. Voyager toilets are also locked out of use sometimes

Voyager:At seat service Drinks and Light refreshments means that you do not have to pace up and down the train trying to frind the shop.

What has that got to do with anything? Depends on the TOC! NXEC usually offer both a buffet and trolley on their HSTs. The type of train makes no difference

Incase you haven't noticed, I much prefer MK3s! Comfier (yes even the FGW refurbs) smoother, quieter and a much more pleasant 'airy' environment than stuffy noisey Voyagers!

Jordy
 
Joined
5 Feb 2009
Messages
1,012
Location
Milton Keynes
I have never been on a voyager, only a meridian, so I cant say much about a voyager. but I know that a meridian is a voyager that has been part repaired (like with a windows service pack) and I have to say this, when I went to the Barrow hill event on the august bank holiday last year I sampled both a meridian and a HST and I have to say that the HST was way more comfortable, (even though about half way home I was dangling out a window). the HST didnt vibrate like a bus when it stopped, you could barely tell it was accelerating when it started because it was so quiet, and the seats were like a lounge chair rather than a mildly padded bench
 

devon_metro

Established Member
Joined
11 Oct 2005
Messages
7,715
Location
London
SuperVoyager mentions wider isles. But at what cost? It means narrower seats. I'd like to think I'm going to spend more time sat down than stood in the aisle, however, perhaps not on Voyagers ;)
 

Pumbaa

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2008
Messages
4,998
In that respect however, it was considerate of the designers to factor in the thousands of people standing throughout most of the day :)
 

SuperVoyager

Member
Joined
8 Mar 2008
Messages
185
Location
Fife
This is pretty irrelevant, down to maintenance not the coach design. Voyager toilets are also locked out of use sometimes
But there are more of them.

one think i dont like about fgw hst is its all blue inside just blue blue blue blue and more blue, for some reason that really gets to me:roll:
 

MCR247

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2008
Messages
9,935
Exactly GV. Also, HSTs have toilets the almost the end of each coach dont they?
 

devon_metro

Established Member
Joined
11 Oct 2005
Messages
7,715
Location
London
You only really need two disabled toilets per train. One in First and one in Standard which is what XC HSTs have.
 

222001

Member
Joined
1 Sep 2006
Messages
727
Location
Chesterfield
You only really need two disabled toilets per train. One in First and one in Standard which is what XC HSTs have.

I agree, thats what the Meridians have plus one small toilet in all other coaches. Why Virgin thought they needed all those over-sized massive toilets I will never know!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top