birchesgreen
Established Member
The EVR had an 80s feel to me when i first started visiting it, as they used mostly DMUs. Not the same now.
I rarely visit heritage railways partly because (in my view) they rarely represent any era.I always think a preserved railway era is what you make of it, obviously the traction on the day rather than buildings etc..
By the end, we had the plethora of Sector liveries and the replacement of many loco classes by Pacers and Sprinters, is this something people actually feel nostalgic about?
Yes, but wouldn't really fit the overall early-60s look of the linew. Nor does the Pacer of course, but there isn't a 60s livery for oneI always hoped that now the 144 has arrived at the WVR in glorious Metrotrain livery, that the 101 would look great in Regional Railways.
1980's style gives two distinct options
- as typical so much actually dating from earlier decades.
- all as if built / rebuilt / refurbished during the 1980's.
Yes, transplanting the canopies and platform buildings from Guildford to a heritage railway would certainly be different as they are quite visibly '80s' in design.Guildford station was rebuilt in 1987. Not all of it was rebuilt fhen though. That would be 1980s. It is going to be rebuilt again soon enough. So if one wanted to recreate it.
I think it was 6700vac 25Hz. The voltage wouldn't be that difficult but 25Hz would need to be generated locally.Imagine the issues if someone wanted to recreate the London and Brighton South Coast Railway OLE. I can't remember the voltage off hand but I am sure it isn't one used now.
Not exactly 1980's though, didn't it get taken down in the early 1920s?Imagine the issues if someone wanted to recreate the London and Brighton South Coast Railway OLE. I can't remember the voltage off hand but I am sure it isn't one used now.
Think the various heritage lines around now manage that quite well.To be realistic for the early 1980's you would need black ballast from DMU and loco oil leaks and stations covered in brake dust from cast iron brake blocks. New Cross used to be one of the dirtiest.
It did. I was just reminded of it when someone was talking about OLE.Not exactly 1980's though, didn't it get taken down in the early 1920s?
Noting that the frequency of the supply voltage wasn't authentic would be like, oh, I don't know, a steam enthusiast looking in an ex-GWR tender and remarking that the coal couldn't possibly have come from South Wales.I think it was 6700vac 25Hz. The voltage wouldn't be that difficult but 25Hz would need to be generated locally.
Indeed, it would need to be bankrolled at a loss by a mad and very rich enthusiast.A full time 1980s replica would not be financially viable. It would attract enthusiasts, but they typically represent only 5 to 10% of paying passengers on heritage railways. The majority are mostly non-enthusiasts, who want to see something "different", and for many of them, that means steam.
I don't think so as it wouldn't have been 25Hz. Just like the German group of countries' electrification, the low frequency AC was the maximum that the induction motors could handle. Rectifiers would have needed a rotary converter.Noting that the frequency of the supply voltage wasn't authentic would be like, oh, I don't know, a steam enthusiast looking in an ex-GWR tender and remarking that the coal couldn't possibly have come from South Wales.
Was the electricity rectified for DC traction motors anyway?
Every day's a school day. Thanks.I don't think so as it wouldn't have been 25Hz. Just like the German group of countries' electrification, the low frequency AC was the maximum that the induction motors could handle. Rectifiers would have needed a rotary converter.
As far as enthusiasts are concerned, the difference in sound that the motors made would be obvious to them.
I feel the same for subsector symbols, Dutch Civil engineers, then from a little bit later Regional Railway’s, Transrail Big T and EWS Red and Gold.I feel quite nostalgic for NSE.
Thjey would be a lot less sympathetic if it had diesel traction given the increasing attention to pollution and climate change measures.It is an interesting flight of fancy but I wonder what the real people would think of a 1980's preserved railway with no stream trains...................
you mean that "clag" & "froth" might not be culturally acceptable?Thjey would be a lot less sympathetic if it had diesel traction given the increasing attention to pollution and climate change measures.
Burning solid hydrocarbons in a mobile firebox for entertaining/nostalgic purposes is OKyou mean that "clag" & "froth" might not be culturally acceptable?