pablo
Member
Dunno. I'm lost. Where is Salford?
Try saying that to the hundreds of passengers that use Salford Central every day. It's far enough from Victoria and Oxford Road/Deansgate to warrant its use as a commuter station for the country's third largest city (even though it is the 'wrong' side of the riverSalford Crescent is enough surely
Dunno. I'm lost. Where is Salford?
It's best suited as a Spinningfields, Deansgate and NW Manchester CBD station.
Pendleton Broad Street was never going to survive long with the opening of Salford Crescent, which is almost literally just around the corner and has a much better service. For a few years Pendleton retained a half-hourly service, with all trains on the Atherton line continuing to call, but this started to dwindle after 1991. First services became hourly, then the station closed in the evenings, and by the time of the fire it was little more than a Parly.
Try saying that to the hundreds of passengers that use Salford Central every day. It's far enough from Victoria and Oxford Road/Deansgate to warrant its use as a commuter station for the country's third largest city (even though it is the 'wrong' side of the river). I would much rather catch my train from there than walk or get a bus to Piccadilly to fight my way on to a service. As previously said, Salford doesn't need a defined centre as it is separated from Manchester city centre only by the river Irwell.
I think fair few users will stay in Salford as well, there are two large HMRC buildings within 5 minutes walk and a new office development planned alongside the viaducts.
Yet in its early days, when it was opened by the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway in 1889 as a four-platform station, built to serve the new lines that led to Wigan and by use of the new Brindle Heath chord, the line to Bolton, it was an important station.
I mention this as a comparison to the narrow single island platform of Salford Crescent that today also has to serve the lines to Wigan and to Bolton.
Try saying that to the hundreds of passengers that use Salford Central every day. It's far enough from Victoria and Oxford Road/Deansgate to warrant its use as a commuter station for the country's third largest city (even though it is the 'wrong' side of the river). I would much rather catch my train from there than walk or get a bus to Piccadilly to fight my way on to a service. As previously said, Salford doesn't need a defined centre as it is separated from Manchester city centre only by the river Irwell.
I think fair few users will stay in Salford as well, there are two large HMRC buildings within 5 minutes walk and a new office development planned alongside the viaducts.
Keep your knickers dry - I meant Salford Crescent is enough in terms of having a station with the name 'Salford' in it. I wasn't advocating closing Salford Central! But rebranding it - if you'd read the thread, that would be apparent.
Now there's a snappy name for a railway station!![]()
Being from the somewhat deep rural parts of Cheshire East, not knowing much of the new development that has taken place between Deansgate and the River Irwell from Bridge Street to Quay Street, can someone confirm the exact location of "Spinningfields"...is that new area classified as being in Manchester or in Salford, as if it is in Manchester, its name should not be conjoined to a Salford railway station.
Spinningfields is definitely in Manchester, although it can be considered as part of a wider area of development including the (proposed) Granada redevelopment on the Manchester side and the Lowry Hotel and Riverside offices on the Salford side.
But it's not on Chapel Street!"Chapel Street for Spinningfields" then?
May I venture a renaming to Salford City
But it's not on Chapel Street!
New Bailey* perhaps? (That's to confuse the people that think it's on Bridge Street)
*an old name for the area between the railway and river, site of the New Bailey prison.
May I venture a renaming to Salford City
You may indeed Paul, but in view of the foregoing discussion, it would seem inappropriate because Salford seems just like a suburb of Manchester, not a really convincing separate place. By using a new name one removes the confusion.
a couple of points, when I worked in Cross Street Manchester for a newspaper,if I recall the bridge under Victoria station was half in Salford/Manchester this on the road to strangeways prison, I am almost sure part of the enormous platform 11 between Exchange & Victoria was crossing the border,this platform was 2194 feet (669m) almost half a mile long the longest in Europe at the time.
Swimming against the tide. It's basically 'West Manchester'. Along with Trafford.
[/QUOTE]If you walk by the shortest route from Deansgate towards Strangeways you stay in Manchester (just), going under the railway just east of the Irwell. However Victoria Street outside the Cathedral is now closed to traffic, which has to dodge into Salford and back again. The boundary leaves the Irwell a little further upstream and the A56 Bury New Road crosses into Salford about half a mile after Strangeways.
Are Manchester United not from Salford?
Are Manchester United not from Salford?
I was quite surprised to find both the settlements of Walsden and Todmorden were incorporated into the area that was administered by the Hundred of Salford.
The area of that football ground is NOT in Salford. Trafford Park, the once major engineering hub of the North-West is also NOT in Salford.