• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Why do ferry services not seem to work in the UK?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
14,545
I am struggling to find evidence where a ferry is more environmentally friendly than a plane.
Would have thought that airplanes use significantly much more fuel than a boat or ferry, in order to get the plane in the air and so move what needs to be moved, whether it's people or cargo. It's not the only factor, obviously, but air freight costs are invariably much more expensive than sea freight to reflect the extra fuel cost.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Sir Felix Pole

Established Member
Joined
21 Oct 2012
Messages
1,321
Location
Wilmslow
A lot of ferry routes have been revived because of climate change conscious consumers recently, so don't write it off.

Why would one operate from Fishguard to Dublin? The amount of time it whacks off the London/SE/West Country/South Wales - Dublin and beyond freight route, that's why.
In Ireland the M11 motorway from Dublin now extends beyond Enniscorthy, with a decent road thence to Rosslare. I can see Irish Ferries chopping their Dublin - Cherbourg service back to Rosslare. Rivals Stena Line and Brittany Ferries now only operate from Rosslare to Cherbourg. A Dublin to Fishguard route is not going to be competitive, whilst on the Welsh side the road to the M4 is less than than ideal.
 

BayPaul

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2019
Messages
1,321
A lot of ferry routes have been revived because of climate change conscious consumers recently, so don't write it off.
Can you give any examples? I'm a massive ferry fan, but I am struggling to think of any, other than Ireland - France routes, which have increased due to Brexit freight issues
 

stuu

Established Member
Joined
2 Sep 2011
Messages
3,403
Would have thought that airplanes use significantly much more fuel than a boat or ferry, in order to get the plane in the air and so move what needs to be moved, whether it's people or cargo. It's not the only factor, obviously, but air freight costs are invariably much more expensive than sea freight to reflect the extra fuel cost.
It's an interesting question. There doesn't seem an easy answer... Stena publish an environmental report, and as a crude average, their ships produce about 0.5 tonnes of CO2 per mile. So taking something in the mid-range of their fleet in terms of tonnage, a ship like those used between Cairnryan and Belfast, that works out to 25g C02 per passenger per mile, assuming the ship is full (I would also assume that given the ship weighs 30,000 tonnes, whether it is full or empty makes next to no difference to fuel consumption).

That compares to an A320 at 108g per passenger mile, but there are loads of caveats and complications
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
26,609
Location
Nottingham
A cargo aircraft isn't going to carry more than a handful of Twenty-foot Equivalent Units worth of stuff before it hits either a volume or a weight capacity. A single container ship can carry many thousands and even a ferry should be able to take dozens of TEUs on trucks. The ship may create more local emissions near ports (though they're mostly required to use cleaner fuels in coastal waters) but I'm pretty sure it will come off better overall.
 

AlastairFraser

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2018
Messages
3,281
I am struggling to find evidence where a ferry is more environmentally friendly than a plane.

The fuel used on most large ferry/cargo ships is very infinitely more impactful than Jet fuel, though the progressive switch to Maritime Gas Oil (MGO) should be helping.

There are very few methods to calculate a boat impact as opposed to a plane impact on the environment.
See this link for passenger ferry vs short haul flight CO2 emissions per passenger: https://www.seat61.com/CO2flights.htm#co2-emissions-for-train-ferry-car-plane. You also have to consider the increased greenhouse effect from air travel releasing emissions at a much higher atmospheric level than sea travel.
In Ireland the M11 motorway from Dublin now extends beyond Enniscorthy, with a decent road thence to Rosslare. I can see Irish Ferries chopping their Dublin - Cherbourg service back to Rosslare. Rivals Stena Line and Brittany Ferries now only operate from Rosslare to Cherbourg. A Dublin to Fishguard route is not going to be competitive, whilst on the Welsh side the road to the M4 is less than than ideal.
While the improvements to the Irish motorway network does make Fishguard to Rosslare more competitive than Fishguard to Dublin, you also have to consider drivers hours legislation. Although it may be quicker to do Fishguard to Rosslare and drive, the additional time at sea helps the rest situation, and is still quicker overall than the Holyhead route to Dublin I believe.
Can you give any examples? I'm a massive ferry fan, but I am struggling to think of any, other than Ireland - France routes, which have increased due to Brexit freight issues
I'm trying to find more info on it, I think I recall some reinstated routes connecting some of the Scandinavian countries, but all I can find info about rn is the proposed Rosyth-Dunkirk ferry! I'll have a proper scour later.

It's an interesting question. There doesn't seem an easy answer... Stena publish an environmental report, and as a crude average, their ships produce about 0.5 tonnes of CO2 per mile. So taking something in the mid-range of their fleet in terms of tonnage, a ship like those used between Cairnryan and Belfast, that works out to 25g C02 per passenger per mile, assuming the ship is full (I would also assume that given the ship weighs 30,000 tonnes, whether it is full or empty makes next to no difference to fuel consumption).

That compares to an A320 at 108g per passenger mile, but there are loads of caveats and complications
Yeah, the graphic the Man in Seat 61 quoted had foot passenger ferries at about 19g CO2 pppm, so pretty close.
 
Last edited:

Flying Snail

Established Member
Joined
12 Dec 2006
Messages
1,833
A cargo aircraft isn't going to carry more than a handful of Twenty-foot Equivalent Units worth of stuff before it hits either a volume or a weight capacity. A single container ship can carry many thousands and even a ferry should be able to take dozens of TEUs on trucks. The ship may create more local emissions near ports (though they're mostly required to use cleaner fuels in coastal waters) but I'm pretty sure it will come off better overall.

A medium sized passenger ferry can carry approx 250 TEU accompanied, the largest such as the Harwich - Hook twins nearly 3 times that.
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,992
Location
K
Why would one operate from Fishguard to Dublin? The amount of time it whacks off the London/SE/West Country/South Wales - Dublin and beyond freight route, that's why.
According to Google Maps the channel tunnel to Fishguard Ferry Port is about 60 miles shorter (40 mins quicker) by road than Holyhead, however if you use the existing Fishguard to Rosslare ferry the total journeytime is 3 hours longer than via Holyhead. A Fishguard to Dublin direct ferry would be twice the sea miles of Holyhead so I can't see how it could offer competitive journey times from the South East/London/Channel.
 

AlastairFraser

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2018
Messages
3,281
According to Google Maps the channel tunnel to Fishguard Ferry Port is about 60 miles shorter (40 mins quicker) by road than Holyhead, however if you use the existing Fishguard to Rosslare ferry the total journeytime is 3 hours longer than via Holyhead. A Fishguard to Dublin direct ferry would be twice the sea miles of Holyhead so I can't see how it could offer competitive journey times from the South East/London/Channel.
We're working on the proviso that the sweet spot for modern ship fuel efficiency and carrying capacity is roughly 27kn/approx. 31 miles an hour. So that kind of operating speed would make such a route viable.
 

Flying Snail

Established Member
Joined
12 Dec 2006
Messages
1,833
We're working on the proviso that the sweet spot for modern ship fuel efficiency and carrying capacity is roughly 27kn/approx. 31 miles an hour. So that kind of operating speed would make such a route viable.

You are wrong on both counts, slower is always more efficient, even with ships designed for those speeds the fuel burn is much higher, 15-22kn is a more realistic speed range and it is notable how much the companies prioritise slower speeds these days.

Fishguard to Dublin is a ridiculous proposition, nobody wants it and it would be impossible to achieve 2 round trips per ship as is the case with the current Ireland - Wales routes.

It is also incorrect to say that it is quicker to Fishguard than Holyhead from London, it isn't, not by road or rail and Holyhead is Motorway/HQ dual carriageway for the whole journey.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
18,523
Agree. It just demonstrates how poor long term planning is for important yet depreciating assets. The business case at the moment probably says we can limp along fixing the vessel for another 5 years so a new vessel gives a poor business cost ratio.
On the other hand many of these ferry routes are rather short, which raises the question of whether a ferry solution is the best choice for many of them.

Places like Norway and the Faroe islands have been expending large sums of money to eliminate ferry links.
Fixed links are, after all, a lot more flexible for users.
 

BayPaul

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2019
Messages
1,321
If you want a route to Dublin with less driving than Holyhead, why not Birkenhead to Dublin. That's 120NM, so a superfast ship could technically (though perhaps not economically) do it in about 5 hours, or 6 at a more sane speed, and so a pair of ships could run two fast day crossings and a slower overnight trip. That's a route that has a lot of potential both for freight and passengers in my opinion.
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,992
Location
K
We're working on the proviso that the sweet spot for modern ship fuel efficiency and carrying capacity is roughly 27kn/approx. 31 miles an hour. So that kind of operating speed would make such a route viable.
It's still 98 nm (Fishguard)vice 58 nm (Holyhead). So simple journey time is around 1 hr 30 longer even at 27 kn, that would wipe out any road time saving for anywhere in the southeast, east of the A34 ish. It's not viable.
 

En

Member
Joined
18 Jun 2024
Messages
178
A cargo aircraft isn't going to carry more than a handful of Twenty-foot Equivalent Units worth of stuff before it hits either a volume or a weight capacity. A single container ship can carry many thousands and even a ferry should be able to take dozens of TEUs on trucks. The ship may create more local emissions near ports (though they're mostly required to use cleaner fuels in coastal waters) but I'm pretty sure it will come off better overall.
indeed

in terms of 'general ' freight the choice (unless perishable fresh ) is between timeliness and cost , this is also where the plans /ideas to build railways from europe to the Far est come from as poentrially straighter journey at 60 -75 mph would provide a convenient middle ground to air freight - anywhere in the world that can take a 767 or A330 in 24 hours , and shipping by sea as the current 'slower than dedicated airfreight' is still airfrieght but without assured connections etc so it may sit for some hours / coupel of days ata hub somewhere until there is space
 

AlastairFraser

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2018
Messages
3,281
You are wrong on both counts, slower is always more efficient, even with ships designed for those speeds the fuel burn is much higher, 15-22kn is a more realistic speed range and it is notable how much the companies prioritise slower speeds these days.

Fishguard to Dublin is a ridiculous proposition, nobody wants it and it would be impossible to achieve 2 round trips per ship as is the case with the current Ireland - Wales routes.
You're entitled to your opinion, but other forum users have calculated that 27kn would be a reasonable balance at which fuel burn is not significantly higher.
It is also incorrect to say that it is quicker to Fishguard than Holyhead from London, it isn't, not by road or rail and Holyhead is Motorway/HQ dual carriageway for the whole journey.
According to current Google Maps estimations, London to Fishguard is 4hr48 mins by car, and London to Holyhead is 5hr22 by car. Even by adjusting for differential HGV/car speed, it's still faster.
It's still 98 nm (Fishguard)vice 58 nm (Holyhead). So simple journey time is around 1 hr 30 longer even at 27 kn, that would wipe out any road time saving for anywhere in the southeast, east of the A34 ish. It's not viable.
It's not just about the South East though. That's one source of traffic, but those in South Wales/the West Country form a sizeable bloc of demand too, and cross-Wales roads are abysmal.
There's precedent for extra South Wales to Ireland routes being specially commissioned because of demand; look at the temporary resurrection of the Swansea-Cork route, as an example.
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,992
Location
K
It's not just about the South East though. That's one source of traffic, but those in South Wales/the West Country form a sizeable bloc of demand too, and cross-Wales roads are abysmal.
There's precedent for extra South Wales to Ireland routes being specially commissioned because of demand; look at the temporary resurrection of the Swansea-Cork route, as an example.
Even from Bristol to Holyhead it's only an hour longer than to Fishguard via the M5/A55. That basically takes out any possible market except for south wales.
South Wales is adequately served by the Cork and Rosslare ferries it's definitely not viable
 

Ken H

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2018
Messages
6,583
Location
N Yorks
Getting to Ireland from the North with car is hard. Nothing from Heysham and its a long drive to Holyhead or Stranraer.
 

AlastairFraser

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2018
Messages
3,281
Getting to Ireland from the North with car is hard. Nothing from Heysham and its a long drive to Holyhead or Stranraer.
Indeed I suggested a Heysham-Belfast route, there is still Birkenhead to Belfast, but a 27knot ferry may just make it viable from Heysham.
Even from Bristol to Holyhead it's only an hour longer than to Fishguard via the M5/A55. That basically takes out any possible market except for south wales.
South Wales is adequately served by the Cork and Rosslare ferries it's definitely not viable
"Only" an hour longer? That's an hour's more of driving time you could use to complete a delivery on the other side.
I must also point out that the Swansea - Cork ferry doesn't exist anymore, because a tourism syndicate wasn't permitted to subsidise it, despite the clear passenger demand for services. Operating a service between two ports used by several other services is less of a barrier to travel.
 

BayPaul

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2019
Messages
1,321
You're entitled to your opinion, but other forum users have calculated that 27kn would be a reasonable balance at which fuel burn is not significantly higher.
This one is fact, not opinion. The Stena Superfast X is capable of a speed of 27 knots. To drive her that fast through the water, she has 4x 11500kw main engines. She can carry 1924 lane metres of freight.
Her replacement on the Holyhead - Dublin route, Stena Estrid can take 3100 lane metres of freight, but only needs 2x 12500kw main engines to drive her at a more sensible 22 knots. That's 3 times the fuel consumption per unit load for an extra 5 knots of speed! Yes, the two ferries are a generation apart, which perhaps makes 10-20% improvement in consumption, but even so, the power needed to take a ship towards her hull speed is just scary!

Incidentally, both vessels are a similar length, but Superfast needs a much narrower and finer hull to achieve this speed, which is why her capacity is much lower. This also impacts her deadweight (maximum weight of cargo that can be carried) - she can take 5700 tonnes, compared to 9777 tonnes on Estrid. Estrid also has a much larger accommodation block, and a dedicated deck for 120 cars on top of her freight capacity, so she is a bigger, better ferry in every way.

Remember that a faster ferry only saves journey time when at full speed at sea - their manoeuvring times would be the same, if anything a little higher as their long thin hull forms don't go sideways or turn quite so easily. This element is normally around 1 hour of the voyage, so is particularly relevant to shorter crossings, such as those to Dublin. On a 98 NM crossing the saving would be under an hour, from just over 5 hours to just over 4.

What is a more of matter of opinion is whether tripling the fuel cost for a 20% reduction in journey time is commercially viable. In some cases it could be, but they are very few and far between. A lot of companies have switched away from Superfast type ferries, or are running them at more conventional speeds - certainly Stena Superfast VIII, IX and X always run at normal speeds, mainly on two engines, making them far more efficient than they were when running around at top speed.
According to current Google Maps estimations, London to Fishguard is 4hr48 mins by car, and London to Holyhead is 5hr22 by car. Even by adjusting for differential HGV/car speed, it's still faster.
It's not just about the South East though. That's one source of traffic, but those in South Wales/the West Country form a sizeable bloc of demand too, and cross-Wales roads are abysmal.
There's precedent for extra South Wales to Ireland routes being specially commissioned because of demand; look at the temporary resurrection of the Swansea-Cork route, as an example.
Services from South Wales are dying slowly. Both operators to Rosslare have recently downgraded their ships, and Swansea-Cork limped along and would never survive with today's crew and fuel costs, let alone be able to compete with Ryanair. The drive to Fishguard is slow, tedious and unreliable - personally I would far rather take the extra 30 mins drive, rather than battle the Bryn Glas tunnels and the long trek from the end of the M4. The port facilities are antiquated and inadequate for most modern ferries. The routes are exposed to the full force of the weather. Personally I think that both Stena and Irish Ferries are playing a game of chicken, both hoping that the other closes their route first, as they really must struggle being in competition on such a marginal route.
 

John Luxton

Established Member
Joined
23 Nov 2014
Messages
1,832
Location
Liverpool
If you want a route to Dublin with less driving than Holyhead, why not Birkenhead to Dublin. That's 120NM, so a superfast ship could technically (though perhaps not economically) do it in about 5 hours, or 6 at a more sane speed, and so a pair of ships could run two fast day crossings and a slower overnight trip. That's a route that has a lot of potential both for freight and passengers in my opinion.
Unfortunately there is no passenger service from Birkenhead to Dublin. The service was withdrawn when Stena took over from Norfolkline who had replaced Norse Merchant quite a few years ago. There were passenger with car facilities with P&O from Liverpool (Seaforth) until the end of last year then that was withdrawn. Freight operator Seatruck did take a limited number of passengers vehicles on their Irish Sea day time sailings from various ports but that ended with Covid and following the company's acquisition by CldN who are a freight only operator all passenger services have now ended.

in February 2024 Stena did introduce a one round trip a day service using the chartered in BORE SONG Afternoon sailing from Birkenhead, morning sailing from Dublin but that is freight only.

There is now no option to sail from Liverpool to Dublin direct. It is necessary to use the almost daily disrupted slog along the A55 to Holyhead. I used to travel by sea to Dublin a lot for day trips and holidays sometimes with the car and sometimes on foot.

Given up now. The A55 is appears to suffer from problems on an almost daily basis. I follow News from Wales and there doesn't seem a day goes past without a crash, blockage, police incident, potential bridge jumper, loose livestock. i am not exagerating these are just some incidents I have noted in the pas few months.

I use the A55 to get to the Welsh Highland Railway every so often, not quite so bad as it is a shorter run from Liverpool and misses out the Anglesey stretch.

Stena really do need to bring back passenger services. They used to be well supported. The Isle of Man Steam Packet fast craft service which operated from Liverpool Landing stage until Sea Containers sold the company on was also very popular with a 4 hour crossing time. Even 6 to 7 hours by direct conventional vessel is better than the A55 slog!
 

BayPaul

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2019
Messages
1,321
Unfortunately there is no passenger service from Birkenhead to Dublin. The service was withdrawn when Stena took over from Norfolkline who had replaced Norse Merchant quite a few years ago. There were passenger with car facilities with P&O from Liverpool (Seaforth) until the end of last year then that was withdrawn. Freight operator Seatruck did take a limited number of passengers vehicles on their Irish Sea day time sailings from various ports but that ended with Covid and following the company's acquisition by CldN who are a freight only operator all passenger services have now ended.

in February 2024 Stena did introduce a one round trip a day service using the chartered in BORE SONG Afternoon sailing from Birkenhead, morning sailing from Dublin but that is freight only.

There is now no option to sail from Liverpool to Dublin direct. It is necessary to use the almost daily disrupted slog along the A55 to Holyhead. I used to travel by sea to Dublin a lot for day trips and holidays sometimes with the car and sometimes on foot.

Given up now. The A55 is appears to suffer from problems on an almost daily basis. I follow News from Wales and there doesn't seem a day goes past without a crash, blockage, police incident, potential bridge jumper, loose livestock. i am not exagerating these are just some incidents I have noted in the pas few months.

I use the A55 to get to the Welsh Highland Railway every so often, not quite so bad as it is a shorter run from Liverpool and misses out the Anglesey stretch.

Stena really do need to bring back passenger services. They used to be well supported. The Isle of Man Steam Packet fast craft service which operated from Liverpool Landing stage until Sea Containers sold the company on was also very popular with a 4 hour crossing time. Even 6 to 7 hours by direct conventional vessel is better than the A55 slog!
I agree. Hopefully the freight only route is a temporary one that becomes a full ropax service. It was all very short notice for them to get it set up when the P&O version closed.
 

John Luxton

Established Member
Joined
23 Nov 2014
Messages
1,832
Location
Liverpool
I agree. Hopefully the freight only route is a temporary one that becomes a full ropax service. It was all very short notice for them to get it set up when the P&O version closed.
When it first started in February through to March they did have ro/pax STENA HORIZON followed by STENA NORDICA operating on the route until they secured the charter of BORE SONG. Either of those could have been tested with passengers to assess demand but they didn't seem keen. A few other people I am in contact with, one of whom works for another ferry operator has suggested Stena don't want to carry passengers out of Birkenhead less it undermines their Holyhead service. But in this day and age when reducing vehicle miles seems to be the objective taking out numberous cars and trucks which travel the 99 miles between Liverpool and Holyhead and vice versa would seem a desirable thing to do. One can only hope that a passenger service will return one day.
 

AlastairFraser

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2018
Messages
3,281
When it first started in February through to March they did have ro/pax STENA HORIZON followed by STENA NORDICA operating on the route until they secured the charter of BORE SONG. Either of those could have been tested with passengers to assess demand but they didn't seem keen. A few other people I am in contact with, one of whom works for another ferry operator has suggested Stena don't want to carry passengers out of Birkenhead less it undermines their Holyhead service. But in this day and age when reducing vehicle miles seems to be the objective taking out numberous cars and trucks which travel the 99 miles between Liverpool and Holyhead and vice versa would seem a desirable thing to do. One can only hope that a passenger service will return one day.
I wonder if the new Isle of Man ferry terminal will induce an uplift in demand for that service, and then Stena will think about a limited reintroduction of Birkenhead to Dublin services as ferries from Liverpool/Birko get a better profile in general.
 

AndrewE

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2015
Messages
5,928
I wonder if the new Isle of Man ferry terminal will induce an uplift in demand for that service, and then Stena will think about a limited reintroduction of Birkenhead to Dublin services as ferries from Liverpool/Birko get a better profile in general.
I don't know whether it will. Maybe there will be better waiting areas for car ferry passengers, but for classic foot passengers it is a lot further from James St station... Perhaps they assume everybody will just get a taxi from Lime St.

Good job I have already been (and enjoyed it, even if Mannanan was significantly late going there - and it was sheer chance that we picked up the 2-hr early departure coming home!)
 

John Luxton

Established Member
Joined
23 Nov 2014
Messages
1,832
Location
Liverpool
I don't know whether it will. Maybe there will be better waiting areas for car ferry passengers, but for classic foot passengers it is a lot further from James St station... Perhaps they assume everybody will just get a taxi from Lime St.

Good job I have already been (and enjoyed it, even if Mannanan was significantly late going there - and it was sheer chance that we picked up the 2-hr early departure coming home!)
LW1 bus operates from Liverpool One Bus Station every 30 minutes on operating days from around 07:30 to 19:30. This is being underwritten by Peel Ports as it is seen as not only serving the IoM Terminal but also the ongoing residential and commencial development and the due to open 2025 Everton football statium. Used it a few times though many passengers from observation still appear to walk presumably staying in local hotels of which there are quite a few. in terms of walking distance I have walked from Liverpool One Bus Station to the new terminal and via the short cut behind Alexandra Tower only takes 5 minutes more than the old terminal. Basically it is little more than a cruise ship length away from the old terminal.
 

AlastairFraser

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2018
Messages
3,281
I don't know whether it will. Maybe there will be better waiting areas for car ferry passengers, but for classic foot passengers it is a lot further from James St station... Perhaps they assume everybody will just get a taxi from Lime St.

Good job I have already been (and enjoyed it, even if Mannanan was significantly late going there - and it was sheer chance that we picked up the 2-hr early departure coming home!)
There is a shuttle bus to/from Liverpool One bus station at the moment, I believe? Maybe this could do with a stop near James St, because it still runs relatively close.

A ferry proposal of the Birko/Liverpool to Dublin length is going to attract primarily vehicles though, to be fair, because the journey time is uncompetitive with the flights.
 

AndrewE

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2015
Messages
5,928
LW1 bus operates from Liverpool One Bus Station every 30 minutes on operating days from around 07:30 to 19:30. This is being underwritten by Peel Ports as it is seen as not only serving the IoM Terminal but also the ongoing residential and commencial development and the due to open 2025 Everton football statium. Used it a few times though many passengers from observation still appear to walk presumably staying in local hotels of which there are quite a few. in terms of walking distance I have walked from Liverpool One Bus Station to the new terminal and via the short cut behind Alexandra Tower only takes 5 minutes more than the old terminal. Basically it is little more than a cruise ship length away from the old terminal.
but if you aren't arriving at L1 bus station that is not a lot of help. I wonder what proportion of IOM ferry public transport users arrive in Liverpool by bus, as opposed to by train?
 

John Luxton

Established Member
Joined
23 Nov 2014
Messages
1,832
Location
Liverpool
but if you aren't arriving at L1 bus station that is not a lot of help. I wonder what proportion of IOM ferry public transport users arrive in Liverpool by bus, as opposed to by train?
Long distance coach services use Liverpool One Bus Station. Lime Central / James St Stations 5 minutes walk from Liverpool 1. Lime Street is probably 10. Problem is when the council messed around with the traffic flows at Lime Street and basically closed it to through traffic made it diffucult for buses from the station to go direct to Liverpool One and then the Sea Terminal. On Friday and Saturday afternoon those buses scheduled to run up Hannover Street and to near Lime Street are diverted up Duke Street, same with incoming buses thus routed a long way away from Lime Street.

They skip stops to avoid the horrendous traffic buildups caused by Taxis and Private Hire Cars.

Just before Covid I had arrived at the old Pier Head Terminal late one Saturday afternoon and walked through to Liverpool 1 to catch the 86 bus home. Took the bus 45 minutes to get from Liverpool One to the stop opposite the old Lewis's Store all caused by heavy traffic and pedestrians crossing.

Now it seems a regular thing for buses departing / arriving Liverpool One at busy times to be diverted via Duke Street. Have seen it done recently. The 80 bus was officially permanently diverted that way some years ago to reduce traffic.

If you are wanting to get to the new Sea Terminal the obvious station to use would be Moorfields and the Old Hall Street exit from where it is about a 10/12 minute walk. I have timed it. BUT that entrance closes early evening and is not open Sat/Sun/BH.

There is a shuttle bus to/from Liverpool One bus station at the moment, I believe? Maybe this could do with a stop near James St, because it still runs relatively close.

A ferry proposal of the Birko/Liverpool to Dublin length is going to attract primarily vehicles though, to be fair, because the journey time is uncompetitive with the flights.
Problem is there is no southbound bus stop on the Strand near the bottom of James St and in their wisdom the council narrowed the south bound Strand to two lanes. Inserting a bus stop there would increase traffic congestion particularly during the evening peak when the afternoon sailing from Douglas usually arrives.

The north bound side near James St I think does have a bus stop but its not used by LW1 which is only shown as stopping at the stops in St Nicholas Place, Princes Parade north end, Triskillion Way and the terminal.

Passengers wanting James Street are told to alight inbound at L1 and walk back. But in effect at the moment due to resurfacing work in the bus station which is still on going they buses are dropping off outside the Hilton Hotel which makes it a slightly shorter walk back to James St..
 
Last edited:

AlastairFraser

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2018
Messages
3,281
Problem is there is no southbound bus stop on the Strand near the bottom of James St and in their wisdom the council narrowed the south bound Strand to two lanes. Inserting a bus stop there would increase traffic congestion particularly during the evening peak when the afternoon sailing from Douglas usually arrives.

The north bound side near James St I think does have a bus stop but its not used by LW1 which is only shown as stopping at the stops in St Nicholas Place, Princes Parade north end, Triskillion Way and the terminal.

Passengers wanting James Street are told to alight inbound at L1 and walk back. But in effect at the moment due to resurfacing work in the bus station which is still on going they buses are dropping off outside the Hilton Hotel which makes it a slightly shorter walk back to James St..
Maybe at least it could observe the northbound stop near James St, and then at least IoM bound passengers would benefit (especially if they're unfamiliar with the city/new terminal/ferry journey
 

Statto

Established Member
Joined
8 Feb 2011
Messages
3,522
Location
At home or at the pub
The Mersey Ferry used to run 05.30 to Midnight, using 2 vessels, one vessel would operate Birkenhead - Liverpool, the other Seacombe - Liverpool, but passenger usage declined a lot in the 80s, largely because of the 2 road tunnels, Merseyrail (particularly after the loop opened), then add in bus deregulation which saw an expansion of cross river bus services, i think it was in 1990 the Mersey Ferry timetable was altered that the service in the peaks would operate a shuttle, but off peak would be an hourly cruise, hours of operation were shortened as well. Birkenhead was dropped a few years ago
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top