• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Wrexham, Shropshire & Midlands Railway updates

Zontar

Member
Joined
10 Oct 2018
Messages
553
Location
Birmingham
Well there's only Chirk and Gobowen stations to test, the rest have seen VT 221s over the years.
I suspect a Central Rivers-Wrexham ECS for start of service would be faster via Lichfield and Crewe, as VT used to do.
How long did that roughly take just out of interest?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,504
Well there's only Chirk and Gobowen stations to test, the rest have seen VT 221s over the years.
I suspect a Central Rivers-Wrexham ECS for start of service would be faster via Lichfield and Crewe, as VT used to do.
Chirk is going to be interesting, it's only a 4 car platform and as built 221s don't have any form of SDO or even local door only.
 

FrontSideBus

Member
Joined
11 Feb 2025
Messages
56
Location
Merseyside
Was in Wrexham today just out of pure chance and clocked it. I was doing the Borderer Line on the 230's.
Plenty of people from Alstom, RailAdventure and WSMR onboard. Spotted them measuring the distance between the cab and the signals ect.
 

Attachments

  • DSCF5041.JPG
    DSCF5041.JPG
    2.5 MB · Views: 201

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,002
Location
Mold, Clwyd
P3 at Wrexham, and possibly the southern bay maintenance platforms, will be new to 221s.

Central Rivers-Lichfield-Crewe-Chester-Wrexham would be about 80 minutes I think, with no messing about through Sutton Park and Walsall.
There was at least one VT 221 ECS which reached Chester via Lichfield, while the Wrexham starter came from Crewe, as does the current 805.
Avanti, pre-covid, did plan to extend the Wrexham service to Gobowen but that extension was canned early on.
 

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,504
They might have to stop and evacuate there in an emergency?
If they evacuate there, then either it's controlled via a cab door (or potentially traincrew pulling egresses) or it's an uncontrolled evacuation where some doors are on a platform and others aren't. Either way, PTI is the least of your worries.

In any case, I assume looking at the timings on RTT that the truth is there were no calls at any stops between Shrewsbury and Wrexham, and that they probably will never stop at Chirk, either in service or on test (or indeed Ruabon, where they likewise will not fit).
 

Moritzplatz

New Member
Joined
9 Feb 2025
Messages
2
Location
Portsmouth
... with no messing about through Sutton Park and Walsall.

As someone who grew up near the old Penns station on the Sutton Park line, it would be exasperating (although totally understandable) to see a passenger service finally use the line, only to speed through a rapidly expanding Walmley without stopping. Nevertheless, the WSMR line would be a positive step overall.
 

John R

Established Member
Joined
1 Jul 2013
Messages
4,431
As someone who grew up near the old Penns station on the Sutton Park line, it would be exasperating (although totally understandable) to see a passenger service finally use the line, only to speed through a rapidly expanding Walmley without stopping. Nevertheless, the WSMR line would be a positive step overall.
Residents close to the Camp Hill line say "Hello".
 

ExRes

Established Member
Joined
16 Dec 2012
Messages
6,644
Location
Back in Sussex
Chirk is going to be interesting, it's only a 4 car platform and as built 221s don't have any form of SDO or even local door only.

I've always found it incredibly inept that the 220/221s have no SDO when 20 years ago we could stop a 9 car 222 on a 1 car platform and release 1 set of doors, truly amazing
 
Last edited:

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
17,537
As someone who grew up near the old Penns station on the Sutton Park line, it would be exasperating (although totally understandable) to see a passenger service finally use the line, only to speed through a rapidly expanding Walmley without stopping. Nevertheless, the WSMR line would be a positive step overall.
The only station being considered for a reopening along there is Aldridge, and that will just be a shuttle to Walsall.
 

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
4,687
As someone who grew up near the old Penns station on the Sutton Park line, it would be exasperating (although totally understandable) to see a passenger service finally use the line, only to speed through a rapidly expanding Walmley without stopping. Nevertheless, the WSMR line would be a positive step overall.
We moved to within sight of the line in 1961, so I have faint memories of seeing passenger trains on it.

If those had survived for a few more years, there might have been the will to build a station serving the new and rapidly expanding Castle Vale estate, and it could have become as busy now as the southern cross-city line (which was almost as moribund in the 1960s). But Birmingham then was motor-city, the Inner and Middle Ring Roads and Aston Expressway were being sliced through the suburbs, and trains were the past.

I've been along the line a few times on charters, and it would indeed be good to see some passenger services back more regularly.
 

sonic2009

Established Member
Joined
19 Jan 2010
Messages
4,987
Location
Crewe
I suspect a Central Rivers-Wrexham ECS for start of service would be faster via Lichfield and Crewe, as VT used to do.
Wouldn't they be able to stable some units at Crewe? As didn't the train care facility service/clean 221s
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,002
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Wouldn't they be able to stable some units at Crewe? As didn't the train care facility service/clean 221s
Well yes, but it all depends how the new WSMR decides to operate its services.
The old WSMR used the servicing facilities at Wrexham for its Mk2/3 sets, so did not do much in the way of positioning runs.
They could utilise ATC at Crewe, but Central Rivers has always been the main base for Voyagers.
 

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,504
Wouldn't they be able to stable some units at Crewe? As didn't the train care facility service/clean 221s
ATC Crewe might not have the space. It's already pretty full at night - and unlike Central Rivers, the Avanti work didn't go away, it just became 80x instead of 221. Central Rivers has the speciality, and presumably more capacity as they're not doing the work on Avanti units any more (apart from the ones that transferred to XC).
 

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,504
They do maintenance on the GC units too.
Fair enough, I didn't realise they were doing that too. My point still stands though, it's likely they'll have capacity for more work compared to what they were doing before Avanti gave up their 221s, especially in comparison to ATC Crewe. Time will tell though - Crewe would certainly be handier for their drivers, assuming they're Wrexham based.
 

357

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2018
Messages
1,810
Fair enough, I didn't realise they were doing that too. My point still stands though, it's likely they'll have capacity for more work compared to what they were doing before Avanti gave up their 221s, especially in comparison to ATC Crewe. Time will tell though - Crewe would certainly be handier for their drivers, assuming they're Wrexham based.
Yeah for sure.

Regarding handy for the drivers - I've never had an issue with long taxi or pass journeys - it's time that I'm being paid to not drive a train!
 

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,504
Yeah for sure.

Regarding handy for the drivers - I've never had an issue with long taxi or pass journeys - it's time that I'm being paid to not drive a train!
That's a matter of taste - I'll go to every effort to avoid taxi jobs personally! I do love travelling pass though.

But also from a company perspective - as you say it's paying drivers to not drive a train. So it's in their best interests to only have to send them 1 hour to Crewe in a taxi rather than 2 hours to Central Rivers.
 

Wolfie

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2010
Messages
6,968
That's a matter of taste - I'll go to every effort to avoid taxi jobs personally! I do love travelling pass though.

But also from a company perspective - as you say it's paying drivers to not drive a train. So it's in their best interests to only have to send them 1 hour to Crewe in a taxi rather than 2 hours to Central Rivers.
Re your last para l guess that it's one factor among many. I agree though that any rational management would take that view all other things being equal.
 

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,504
Re your last para l guess that it's one factor among many. I agree though that any rational management would take that view all other things being equal.
And this is all assuming the traincrew depot is in Wrexham. Which would make sense from a PR perspective, but it'll be interesting to see how well they do recruiting drivers, if they're planning on taking on qualifieds.
 

Top