Problem is a similar thing happened with the London Waterloo Blockade.
To what "problem" do you refer?
I think you may wish to clarify whether you are alleging a major irregularity has taken place - which I have seen nothing to suggest is the case.
Problem is a similar thing happened with the London Waterloo Blockade.
Problem is a similar thing happened with the London Waterloo Blockade.
To what "problem" do you refer?
I think you may wish to clarify whether you are alleging a major irregularity has taken place - which I have seen nothing to suggest is the case.
That overran by about an hour or two on the Monday morning.
The possession might have overrun by an hour or so but the Sunday before the Monday of re-opening only had the International Platforms open all day I don't think that was part of the plan?
Train Plan on the hoof rather than a proper planned one and all the consequences that fell from thatWhat actual problems did that cause?
Train Plan on the hoof rather than a proper planned one and all the consequences that fell from that
Signalling is always last to complete for these reasons, so they get the heat and pressure when work is overrunning, even if they couldn't start final tests and commissioning when they should have. Also working hours start to run out whether or not people are doing useful work, and there may not be a spare shift waiting on standby to take over. I wonder if any COVID-related absences have affected resource availability too.The overrun is because the signalling alterations and the safety and functional testing of the signalling are taking significantly longer than planned.
Before the signalling can be tested, all other work must have been completed.
And until the testing is completed, no part of the any of the lines that were closed can be reopened.
So either earlier works took longer than expected, hence delaying the signalling work. Or the time frame for the signalling work was underestimated.
In terms of train plan, if they had enough resources, they could have continued to use the plan that they were using earlier in the month.
But a lack of train crew is not helping.
I've heard that there aren't many people qualified to test and sign off large signalling projects like this.Signalling is always last to complete for these reasons, so they get the heat and pressure when work is overrunning, even if they couldn't start final tests and commissioning when they should have. Also working hours start to run out whether or not people are doing useful work, and there may not be a spare shift waiting on standby to take over. I wonder if any COVID-related absences have affected resource availability too.
OK, what level of delays and cancellations were there?
Before the project started, control had already been moved to TVSC at Didcot (*). The new layout including all the new signalling is controlled from TVSC.Does this project involve any signalling re-control at all? Apologies if I’ve missed any previous info in a quick scan of the thread.
Ok and thanks for explaining.Before the project started, control had already been moved to TVSC at Didcot (*). The new layout including all the new signalling is controlled from TVSC.
(*) Before electrification could proceed, the existing signalling system had to be replaced, as it was not compatible with OHL electrification. And yes I know the OHL has not reached Temple Meads yet…
All those on the down side were definitely clear, as the alignment of the Down Main / Platform 15 line is not moving much (if anything).Were the lineside cabinets able to be positioned in places that weren't affected by the track layout, so that only parts of them needed re-wiring rather than moving the whole thing?
The big difference with Reading is that the amount of heavy infrastructure changes with the latter were very substantial, including many new platforms, a full rebuild of the station at platform level, and grade separation, most notably west of the station. It even included a depot being relocated to a new site.I assumed the strategy would be similar to Reading - re-lock and re-control the existing layout and later change it piecemeal, taking advantage of the ability to change data-driven signalling systems with less difficulty than hard-wired ones. However it seems that after the first part the layout has been changed in a "big bang", unlike Reading where it dragged on over a period of years. Were the lineside cabinets able to be positioned in places that weren't affected by the track layout, so that only parts of them needed re-wiring rather than moving the whole thing?
Just need some overhead wiresBristol Temple Meads is open again, work seems to have finished on time.
NR have posted some pictures of the shiny new trackwork, looks great!
View attachment 102178
View attachment 102179
In theory the last major obstacle is gone now - no excuses for not authorising it anymore.Just need some overhead wires
I sincerely hope that’s a joke!Unfortunately that nice new signal gantry may not be fully compatible. Apparently they had to guess, as the OHL design has not been completed yet…
I’m not jokingI sincerely hope that’s a joke!