google.com
Thanks for your assistance. I am finding the after-effects of the TIA have had certain repercussions that I could well do without.
You are aware that BP is a contraction of British Petroleum, not Benjamin Parker? This is a tax on large exploitative corporations, not on individuals.
I think in that case, the Labour Party would use the challenging market conditions to nationalise the energy companies, protecting workers jobs and providing low cost energy to the people.
An interesting phenomenon, you had blokes who had been employed by the National Coal board, and went on strike with the literal communist Arthur Scargill, who somehow though that Corbyn was too left wing.
If that be the case and the energy companies being as well aware as you are of the implications expected from a Labour Government, they will ensure all moveable financial matters find a new home well before the Day of Armageddon.
Thank you for bringing this review to the attention of the website. Can you oblige by informing us when it is due to start and who is likely to serve upon it.
The Echo have really got thier game back. They went through a period of being a bit wishy washy and sucking up to the local Tories. They have finally seen the error of thier ways. ( they always used to have a very moral tone in reporting and stood for "what was right")
Is this a thought process Tories go through every time there is a risk of Labour getting into power? it is sooooooooooooo boring.
When will the full details be forthcoming, so we can all be aware of what will be included?
When Sunak or Johnson tell thier favourite PR mouth piece and/or tell Parliament.
If Tories, in the instance you quote above, are a name commonly used by people who do not like using the phrase Conservatives, what do such people also call Labour Party supporters. You will be aware that I have my own particular name for them.
eh? What are you talking about?
Sorry to have confused you by "asking big words".
There are no big words and precious little point. What confuses me is what you are trying to say? Is it that I shouldn't use the word "Tory" to describe Johnson and his crime syndicate?
Perhaps the best summary of Johnson and his Britannia Unchained/Brexiter acolytes that I have seen on this thread!
"The Day of Armageddon"? We've already had it. 2019-12-13. Proof that all that Friday 13th stuff isn't so superstitious after all.
An ex labour councillor also! It is worth looking out his story. he was suspended by Labour for some unpleasantness involving travellers.
Yes, I saw that. Thoroughly unpleasant individual, based on the evidence I've seen.
news.sky.com
The coming by-elections might make the trickle become a deluge. The Honiton and Tiverton result, if the Tories lose or only just hold onto it, is much more significant in my eyes because nowhere is more solid Conservative territory currently than S.W. England. Watch the rabbit MPs scurrying back to their burrows before they re-emerge en masse to make the surprise announcement that some of them have discovered an unused part of their anatomies i.e. a backbone. Hopefully it will not save too many of them, though the Member for the British Virgin Islands might survive.John Baron and David Simmonds have now publicly called for Johnson to quit:
Boris Johnson urged by three more Tory MPs to step down over Sue Gray's partygate report
The latest announcements, which follow the report detailing drunkenness and partying at Number 10, mean that a total of 19 backbenchers are now calling on the prime minister to quit.
If you look at the very first posting on this thread, it mentions that the Conservative Party had lost two by-elections in a row. Howsoever, at the last General Election, they had a much-increased majority from the previous General Election, so the loss of a couple of by-elections would not make as much damage as would have been the case in the previous administration.
Sadly this was wishful thinking rather than a statement of what's actually happening, which is why I said "a review" rather than "the review". Even more sadly, I think the two major Parties who have held power for the last 100 years between them, are so entrenched that it will never happen, because all of their MPs know their seats would be at serious risk if we had a fairer voting system. Yes, a fairer voting system would attract a greater number of voters and hopefully stop some of the huge voting apathy we have at present, but among MPs (most of them, in all Parties, although there are some exceptions), selfishness generally prevails.
I think the only real likelihood is if we get another hung parliament and the smaller parties make it a condition of joining a coalition. Though they'd need a bit more backbone than the LibDems past time who settled for a referendum on AV.
It would be possible for me to date Kate Moss too but probably just as unlikely.
