• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Manchester & North West Transformation Programme

LOL The Irony

On Moderation
Joined
29 Jul 2017
Messages
5,335
Location
Chinatown, New York
Plus if you’re coming from Preston, why would you need to connect at Piccadilly for London?
You wouldn't, but Piccadilly is still the main station in Manchester. I wonder how many passengers using the Blackpool services have used another service to get to Piccadilly?
SPEED option taken - P3 will be the turn back with 2 through platforms. A typo in my earlier post - P2 will be extended through the closure of P1.
Where can I find a diagram of this SPEED option?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

507020

Established Member
Joined
23 May 2021
Messages
1,867
Location
Southport
The viaduct between Piccadilly and Oxford Road is only a two-line viaduct.
I’ve never been sure that more than 2 through platforms at Oxford Road has ever been of any benefit for this reason. Eliminating reversals in platform 5 that foul all 4 other platforms and crew changes in such an illogical location is probably of more benefit, but Castlefield seriously does need to be 4 tracks throughout.
I don't think there is enough space for it to be of a useful length without buffers. That's the reason for the mess that Oxford Road is now; removing and realigning platforms won't substantively help with that.
How does this make sense? Surely there would be more usable length on the centre platform without any taken up by buffers? Platform 1 urgently needs to be closed due to it being inaccessible which is simply not acceptable for a city centre station.
 

Sonik

Member
Joined
7 Jun 2022
Messages
326
Location
WCML South
I don't think there is enough space for it to be of a useful length without buffers. That's the reason for the mess that Oxford Road is now; removing and realigning platforms won't substantively help with that.
The main issue with Oxford road is the bay platform, departing trains must cross the up line.

Moving the bay to the middle removes this conflict and allows parallel moves in either direction

Not sure if discussed before but this document explains the various issues in the area.
 
Last edited:

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
7,754
Location
Leeds
The viaduct between Piccadilly and Oxford Road is only a two-line viaduct.
However the theory behind the old proposal that remains on Shapps's desk is that two tracks are enough to feed four platforms each at Oxford Road and Piccadilly, because trains spend more time in the platforms.
 

dunc695

Member
Joined
24 Jun 2022
Messages
55
Location
Lancaster
I still think when all is said & done the Castlefield corridor will still have a congestion problem as long as the majority of the route remains a double track viaduct. Given the restricted nature of the route you can only do so much. It just wasn't designed for the high volume of traffic using it.
 

Agent_Squash

Established Member
Joined
22 Jul 2016
Messages
1,233
I still think when all is said & done the Castlefield corridor will still have a congestion problem as long as the majority of the route remains a double track viaduct. Given the restricted nature of the route you can only do so much. It just wasn't designed for the high volume of traffic using it.

Thameslink and Clapham Junction (SN fasts) both have significantly more going through Castlefield. What the corridor needs is standardisation.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
98,002
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
However the theory behind the old proposal that remains on Shapps's desk is that two tracks are enough to feed four platforms each at Oxford Road and Piccadilly, because trains spend more time in the platforms.

And a train is more likely to be declared a failure at a platform. Or require a fitter urgently. Or an ambulance.

15/16 will certainly help with the platform overcrowding at Picc (as would switching to side platforms) but we will still be in the position where events that are not that rare can bring the whole North West rail network to a standstill, and unlike say Merseyrail where you can fix it with a few cancellations, it'll then be off all day.
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
12,133
Location
UK
The main issue with Oxford road is the bay platform, departing trains must cross the up line.

Moving the bay to the middle removes this conflict and allows parallel moves in either direction

Not sure if discussed before but this document explains the various issues in the area.
I am well versed with the issues, I was just pointing out that realigning things is of no use unless you install the buffer, as the buffer removes the need for an overlap. Which in this, very constrained, location is the difference between a platform that's long enough for 6x23m coaches and one that isn't.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
98,002
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I am well versed with the issues, I was just pointing out that realigning things is of no use unless you install the buffer, as the buffer removes the need for an overlap. Which in this, very constrained, location is the difference between a platform that's long enough for 6x23m coaches and one that isn't.

6x23m...what are we proposing to turn back there? Surely only relatively local stuff like Southport and CLC slows, which aren't likely to need that length for a long time?
 

Greybeard33

Established Member
Joined
18 Feb 2012
Messages
4,274
Location
Greater Manchester
I am well versed with the issues, I was just pointing out that realigning things is of no use unless you install the buffer, as the buffer removes the need for an overlap. Which in this, very constrained, location is the difference between a platform that's long enough for 6x23m coaches and one that isn't.
What are the requirements for overrun distance between the buffer stop and the eastern throat, to protect against a train hitting the buffers?
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
12,133
Location
UK
6x23m...what are we proposing to turn back there? Surely only relatively local stuff like Southport and CLC slows, which aren't likely to need that length for a long time?
It would be prudent to allow flexibility in the layout, including capacity for growth. The current service pattern could scarcely have been imagined when Castlefield was last remodelled.

Now arguably you could say it makes sense to have the middle platform as a bidirectional loop for the time being, like platform 5 at Milton Keynes.

And then when/if train lengths need to increase, the pointwork at the east/south end can be removed and a bufferstop installed in its place. Hopefully by that point, platforms 15/16 or some other mitigation would be in place.

But either way the layout has to consider all of these possibilities.
 

Sonik

Member
Joined
7 Jun 2022
Messages
326
Location
WCML South
I am well versed with the issues, I was just pointing out that realigning things is of no use unless you install the buffer, as the buffer removes the need for an overlap. Which in this, very constrained, location is the difference between a platform that's long enough for 6x23m coaches and one that isn't.
Ah thanks, understood.

I did wonder about the impact of the overlap with parallel platforms. I guess this effectively eats capacity/headway on the main lines because overun/SPAD must be considered.

Bottom line, the viaduct is mostly two track and it's not getting widened. So probably best to try and turn it into a Thameslink style trunk as others have suggested, and this seems to be the thinking with the new plans.
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
12,133
Location
UK
I’ve never been sure that more than 2 through platforms at Oxford Road has ever been of any benefit for this reason
Back when train lengths were shorter, everything could use half a platform and this worked well. You could have trains simultaneously arriving and departing from alternate platforms and barely anything used platform 5.

This is now no longer feasible because of the extension of trains to 5 or 6 coaches in many cases.

Eliminating reversals in platform 5 that foul all 4 other platforms and crew changes in such an illogical location is probably of more benefit, but Castlefield seriously does need to be 4 tracks throughout.
The crew changes aren't illogical and eliminating them would require a huge amount of route learning, which would take a long time to undertake. I agree that it would be desirable but the Treasury is unlikely to see it that way.

Castlefield being 2 track isn't really the biggest constraint, it is the flat junctions and insufficient platforms that kill it.

How does this make sense? Surely there would be more usable length on the centre platform without any taken up by buffers? Platform 1 urgently needs to be closed due to it being inaccessible which is simply not acceptable for a city centre station.
Because you need an overlap if there isn't a buffer. And that overlap would have to go onto either the Down line (thus preventing trains from arriving into Oxford Road from Piccadilly) or onto the Up line (thus preventing trains from departing Oxford Road for Piccadilly).

Otherwise a train couldn't arrive into the bay until the previous train had left the Up platform and vacated the overlap - in other words, the platform would be basically useless.
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
2,749
Location
Somerset
Platform 1 urgently needs to be closed due to it being inaccessible which is simply not acceptable for a city centre
If that’s the case then it needs to be made accessible. Unless it can be closed with no detrimental effect on services, “levelling down” by closing it to make it inaccessible to all isn’t going to help.
 

Chester1

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
4,017
While 4 through platforms at Piccadilly and Oxford Road would help, having two longer through platforms and a middle turn around platform at Oxford Road is an improvement on current situation. Platform 1 isn't much use without lift access, the island platform gets overcrowded and trains going in or out of platform 5 block the lines. The alterations sound like a good interim solution. More grade seperated junctions might be the most helpful next step.

Are there any plans for more facilities on the land of platform 5 and old platform 6 and the unused buildings between them and station approach road?
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
32,440
Location
A semi-rural part of north-west England
While 4 through platforms at Piccadilly and Oxford Road would help, having two longer through platforms and a middle turn around platform at Oxford Road is an improvement on current situation. Platform 1 isn't much use without lift access, the island platform gets overcrowded and trains going in or out of platform 5 block the lines. The alterations sound like a good interim solution. More grade seperated junctions might be the most helpful next step.

Are there any plans for more facilities on the land of platform 5 and old platform 6 and the unused buildings between them and station approach road?
To achieve this total recast of the layout at Manchester Oxford Road station, what time period would be required to effect the works and how major would the disruption to train services be, especially to the freight services that pass through that station?
 

dunc695

Member
Joined
24 Jun 2022
Messages
55
Location
Lancaster
Rochdale is very similar they installed a middle bay a few years ago for terminating services from Clitheroe to stop trains occupying platforms at Victoria.
 

InOban

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2017
Messages
4,223
Castlefield being 2 track isn't really the biggest constraint, it is the flat junctions and insufficient platforms that kill it

Absolutely. There was a study reported in modern railways a couple of years ago which was quite clear on this, and suggested some of the enhancements currently being progressed or designed.
 

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
7,905
Location
Dalton GA USA & Preston Lancs
To achieve this total recast of the layout at Manchester Oxford Road station, what time period would be required to effect the works and how major would the disruption to train services be, especially to the freight services that pass through that station?
I agree that freight would be problematic. Passenger Use a blitz blockade strategy where everything goes to Victoria and Piccadilly and accept there will be huge disruption . I lived through the Crewe blockade in 1985. There is always a way.
 

507020

Established Member
Joined
23 May 2021
Messages
1,867
Location
Southport
Back when train lengths were shorter, everything could use half a platform and this worked well. You could have trains simultaneously arriving and departing from alternate platforms and barely anything used platform 5.

This is now no longer feasible because of the extension of trains to 5 or 6 coaches in many cases.
They may be easier to deal with, but the running of 2 and 3 car trains is no longer feasible in many cases since they can’t accommodate the right number of passengers, bikes or luggage etc, although removing toilets may improve capacity, there isn’t really any alternative in the short term to 5 or 6 car trains and the effect on platform occupancy they have. The question is what will we do when 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 or 14 car trains begin to be required?
Rochdale is very similar they installed a middle bay a few years ago for terminating services from Clitheroe to stop trains occupying platforms at Victoria.
And it also allows the intermediate stations to be served following the conversion of the Oldham line to the Metrolink. Rochdale did originally have 2 islands though akin to Bolton, Blackburn and stations like that.
 

Greybeard33

Established Member
Joined
18 Feb 2012
Messages
4,274
Location
Greater Manchester
The crew changes aren't illogical and eliminating them would require a huge amount of route learning, which would take a long time to undertake. I agree that it would be desirable but the Treasury is unlikely to see it that way.
I imagine that Northern's December timetable changes will greatly reduce crew changes at Oxford Road. The Southport service will terminate at Oxford Road instead of continuing through to Alderley Edge; the Chat Moss stopper will terminate at the Airport instead of continuing to Crewe; and both Blackpool services will go to the Airport instead of one going to Hazel Grove.
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
32,440
Location
A semi-rural part of north-west England
I agree that freight would be problematic. Passenger Use a blitz blockade strategy where everything goes to Victoria and Piccadilly and accept there will be huge disruption . I lived through the Crewe blockade in 1985. There is always a way.
With regards freight, many years ago I was informed that freight was allowed down the steep Miles Platting Bank to Manchester Victoria, but not up the said bank.
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
12,133
Location
UK
I imagine that Northern's December timetable changes will greatly reduce crew changes at Oxford Road. The Southport service will terminate at Oxford Road instead of continuing through to Alderley Edge; the Chat Moss stopper will terminate at the Airport instead of continuing to Crewe; and both Blackpool services will go to the Airport instead of one going to Hazel Grove.
True, and those will all help. However Airport services will still likely have some crew changes at Oxford Road because not everyone signs Blackpool or Liverpool. And the TPE Cleethorpes-Liverpool service will likely have some Oxford Road crew changes, again out of necessity.

The Southports will also continue to have crew changes, and although a lack of relieving crew isn't quite as much an issue on them, both with the current and future layouts it has the potential to delay other services.

With regards freight, many years ago I was informed that freight was allowed down the steep Miles Platting Bank to Manchester Victoria, but not up the said bank.
That is still the case today for the heavier freights.
 

Greybeard33

Established Member
Joined
18 Feb 2012
Messages
4,274
Location
Greater Manchester
The Southports will also continue to have crew changes, and although a lack of relieving crew isn't quite as much an issue on them, both with the current and future layouts it has the potential to delay other services.
There should also be fewer relieving crew changes on the CLC stoppers, with the reduction from 2tph to 1tph off peak.
 

Purple Orange

On Moderation
Joined
26 Dec 2019
Messages
3,445
Location
The North
You wouldn't, but Piccadilly is still the main station in Manchester. I wonder how many passengers using the Blackpool services have used another service to get to Piccadilly?
Yet Victoria is a better located station if you’re going to Manchester, which for the vast majority is the end destination.
 

LOL The Irony

On Moderation
Joined
29 Jul 2017
Messages
5,335
Location
Chinatown, New York
Yet Victoria is a better located station if you’re going to Manchester, which for the vast majority is the end destination.
Whether one likes Victoria or not its the best station for the main shopping areas.
But I'm not saying it isn't? All I'm saying is Piccadilly is the main station, which isn't an opinion, it's factually correct.
 

dunc695

Member
Joined
24 Jun 2022
Messages
55
Location
Lancaster
Yes it is the main station but there are services that are specific to both Piccadilly and Victoria. Hope Valley services don't serve Victoria as much as Caldervale don't serve Piccadilly.
 

Top