RPI in July was 13.1%, NR made an offer of 5% in December for this year (whilst it's then 4% for next year arguably there's a risk that there'll be a bit more inflation next year, however either way there's a chance that it's not going to be not much difference than 13%), I don't know but an offer similar to ScotRail where they got 7.5% this year is probably enough to resolve things, even if next year was reduced to 3% (total of around 11% to 12% over 2 years).
Yes Sunday working needs fixing, however that is very different to "no job cuts in the next 24 months" which is one of the issues (as I understand it).
Now one way to resolve that last point would be to say "if passenger numbers don't reach x by a given date we will be reducing headcount by an agreed figure" there would be a range of levels based on different passenger numbers, however could include "no cuts" or even "we'd look to increase headcount" if numbers are high enough.
Many of the public would support the government over the RMT if the RMT were saying no job cuts even if rail use was 50% lower than pre Covid. However with rail use continuing to grow and already much higher than 50%, there's a risk that in 24 months the government would be looking to cut staff - even though rail use has recovered.
0% finding growth is unlikely to happen, 20% is unlikely to happen (although not impossible if the strikes were to end and the likes of TPE, XC and Avanti were to see service km's higher than 60-65%), I've never said that there shouldn't be cuts (rather that they should be considered, to ensure they don't cost the country more than not making the cuts).
As such it's a question of where do we try for growth from where we are currently (Avanti appears a good option) and where do we make cuts (LNER would be a very bad choice given passenger km's are at 97% of pre Covid levels when you compare Q1 and Q2 usage in 2022/23 to the same six months in 2019/20).
Indeed, Sunday in most service industries should be (at least for new contacts in the last 5 years, bit probably longer) considered a normal working day with at least some TOC's having a 7 day timetable (some may not, but they may need more of some services at the weekend).
The average car occupancy is around 1.5.
Just one car of 4 means that there's 8 other cars with just 1 person in.
Looking at it from a individual family perspective for every 200 mile holiday trip with all 4 from the family in the car there's going to be 1,600 miles where there's only one person in the car (say going to/from work for 1/3 of the year)
Now whilst a lot of families may use their cars with a higher person occupancy rate than the average these are offset by the many many people who spend a lot of time driving on their own. However I suspect that most would still be surprised about just how low their average occupancy rate is if they were to log it.
For instance taking two kids to school and then home is 2, however add a bit more to go to a supermarket and it's 1.75 if to the shop adds the same distance again as to the school to the overall journey.