• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Why do people not move down carriages to make more space?

Status
Not open for further replies.

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,865
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
I agree with that absolutely.

Oh dear! :)


Way back in my commuting days, I sometimes travelled in class 309 express trains, which were TSOs or similar. If they were crowded, the car end vestibules were packed, but the saloons were just fullof seated passengers. I would normally go straight into the saloons and stand between the 2+2 seats somewhere near the middle of the car. There was much more room, it was quieter and every seat had a hand grab so far preferable to being wedged in the dark vestibule. The real benefit of being in the car was when the train approached the next stop, it was easy to see various seated passengers clearing the table of their belongings to alight. When the train actually stopped, I had the pick of the vacated seats, whilst the twits in the vestibule could only look at the queue of passengers coming towards them as they exited via the vestibule.

People with above-average awareness / intelligence / aptitude should certainly be able to derive benefit from that, and this should be celebrated rather than shamed. We shouldn’t attempt to debase everything to the level of the dumbest.

It does sound like you’re making an argument for a 365-style train over a 700 though!
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Deepgreen

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
6,443
Location
Betchworth, Surrey
Thread title needs correcting. Assuming the question is WHY don't people move down - selfishness, fear of not being able to get off when they need to, ignorance, deafness, etc. An age-old problem.
 

Taunton

Established Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
10,196
The London Underground also has this issue.

Carriages at the end of the train tend to be noticeably quieter than those in the centre.
Elizabeth Line is the opposite, as most stations in the core (Paddington excepted) have been built with entrances at both ends, and it's a long way to walk along the platforms. Trains fuller at both ends than in the middle.
 

geoffk

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2010
Messages
3,288
I suppose if your destination is a terminus station with tickets gates and it's a busy train you want to be near the front, to avoid getting in a queue to leave the station.
 

occone

Member
Joined
8 Apr 2023
Messages
137
Location
Bristol
Yesterday the conductor was advising over the intercom that the back carriage had plenty of seats despite the front being full and standing - but I didn't see anyone move forward. Neither did I.

I think in part it is the effort of having to do loads of "excuse me please and thank you" along the route as you squeeze past people who are packed in the vestibule who are also not moving. Most people probably put up with the misery of standing over the effort needed to move forwards.

For me I had my folded but heavy ebike which I couldn't get through the corridors so I just stayed with it in the bike store. Maybe other also had luggage?

(Tangent) A few of us were there with bikes so we got chatting at least, mostly about how the eight hundos are so unsuitable for storage despite them having an entire kitchen at one end that's barely ever used. Nothing wrong with a bit of camaraderie. (End tangent)

I'd like if the conductor could make outside announcements to people on the platform. That way they could tell people to move to the back before they get on and feel committed to their little compartment of misery. The Manchester Metrolink has this facility with speakers on the outside of the trams.
 

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
12,250
Happens all the time on my route. Mainly groups of younger kids get on the front 331 to avoid paying for a ticket, the other day my train had RPOs in the front set and a girl got fined and she was so mad about it LOL
Oh dear! Quel dommage!
 

Krokodil

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2023
Messages
2,851
Location
Wales
Happens all the time on my route. Mainly groups of younger kids get on the front 331 to avoid paying for a ticket, the other day my train had RPOs in the front set and a girl got fined and she was so mad about it LOL
Well as long as they don't moan about standing. It always astonishes me how many fare-dodgers think that they have the right to complain about the service.
 

stan claire

Member
Joined
26 Feb 2022
Messages
64
Location
BuckshawParkwa
Well as long as they don't moan about standing. It always astonishes me how many fare-dodgers think that they have the right to complain about the service.
It wasn't that busy either tbf. She did try every excuse in the book to try and get out of the penalty fare though.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,865
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
Elizabeth Line is the opposite, as most stations in the core (Paddington excepted) have been built with entrances at both ends, and it's a long way to walk along the platforms. Trains fuller at both ends than in the middle.

JLE is the same, especially with Stratford being a major traffic generator and the entrance being at the end.

The Victoria Line is a good one, going south the north end of the train is always quieter, especially if the train has started from Seven Sisters. This used to be the case going north as well, but the Victoria station upgrade has changed that, now the south end is quietest. Likewise the rear car of Bakerloo trains going south can be very empty, it’s occasionally possible to have a car to one’s self for the whole journey from Queen’s Park to Elephant & Castle.
 

CaptainHaddock

Established Member
Joined
10 Feb 2011
Messages
2,229
Is any of this actually a problem? If people choose not to spread out, then it’s good for those who do make the effort.
I agree. It's a very smug feeling to be sat in a relatively empty front carriage of a 2x4 XC service when the rear 4 car unit is full and standing because the majority of passengers haven't bothered to do their research as to how many coaches there are and where the doors will open.

Occasionally some foolish guard will make an announcement along the lines of "if you're standing in the rear 4 coaches please move forward as there's plenty of seats further up" and you feel like yelling "don't tell the normals!"
 

Wychwood93

Member
Joined
25 Jan 2018
Messages
646
Location
Burton. Dorset.
I agree. It's a very smug feeling to be sat in a relatively empty front carriage of a 2x4 XC service when the rear 4 car unit is full and standing because the majority of passengers haven't bothered to do their research as to how many coaches there are and where the doors will open.

Occasionally some foolish guard will make an announcement along the lines of "if you're standing in the rear 4 coaches please move forward as there's plenty of seats further up" and you feel like yelling "don't tell the normals!"
I am sure you are having a bit of a laugh here? Certainly with regard to 2x4 or 5 XCs. There is, as 'we' all know, no chance of moving along when in motion. Ditto with GWR 2x5 - however, with the latter a bit of knowledge a decent result can be obtained. A 5-car from Penzance sometimes attaches at Plymouth - meaning, if you are joining at Exeter, it is best to be at the London end (front 5) at Exeter. Other obvious tips are available - e.g. take note of the stop boards - best to stand a rough coach length+ back to see how the loading looks. I could go on!
 

BeccaOnATrain

Member
Joined
5 Sep 2021
Messages
107
Location
Stockport
Thread title needs correcting. Assuming the question is WHY don't people move down - selfishness, fear of not being able to get off when they need to, ignorance, deafness, etc. An age-old problem.

This happens on buses too. Cue the bus driver repeatedly shouting "Can you make room at the front please!". People just don't like standing in aisles for some reason!

Personally I dislike being stood up half way down the aisles on a train, especially on something like a 158 when everyone is crammed in near the doors - having to squeeze past everyone to get off when you're 5-10 rows deep into the carriage. At least if you are sat down when the carriage is full everyone will clearly see that someone has stood up from their seat and ready to try and get to the doors so start adjusting to let them off - but if you're already stood up in the aisle it's not so obvious someone is trying to make their way through - especially if you're short like me!
 

Silenos

Member
Joined
13 Dec 2022
Messages
309
Location
Norfolk
Why? Because:
  1. When a packed commuter train releases the huddled masses you can easily spend 10 extra minutes queuing to get out of the station if you are at the other end of the train; on many lines most of the exits are at the same end of the platform, which exacerbates the problem of internal crowding.
  2. You usually have a limited amount of time to board, which means you do not have time to saunter along the platform looking for a less crowded carriage (again, exacerbated by having many platform exit/entrances at one end).
  3. It is difficult if not impossible to move along a full and standing carriage; this not only makes it hard to move within the train to find a less crowded area, it disinclines people to move away from the doors because they worry that they won’t be able to get out when their station is reached.
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
17,758
Location
Another planet...
I'd like if the conductor could make outside announcements to people on the platform. That way they could tell people to move to the back before they get on and feel committed to their little compartment of misery. The Manchester Metrolink has this facility with speakers on the outside of the trams.
I've often wondered if guards could be issued with small megaphones (if that isn't an oxymoron) so that they can, for example, tell people not to crowd round the doors and to let people off first.

Probably wouldn't be allowed anyway, just in case someone decides it hurts their ears a bit if they get "shouted at".
 

infobleep

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
12,776
Is any of this actually a problem? If people choose not to spread out, then it’s good for those who do make the effort.
It is but the issue is I couldn't spread out as people were in the way and someone with a pushchair had to squeeze on.

Has people spread the out we would have had more space.

Had I known the train was busy I would have gone to the back to start with.

For regular journeys people will sometimes work out which carriage they need to be in so that they are near the stairs/platform exit when they disembark so that they can make a quick a getaway and avoid being caught up in the crowd or having to walk half the length of the platform before exiting the station.
I do this but wouldn't on a busy train except if I was in a hurry.
 

Master29

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2015
Messages
1,970
The London Underground also has this issue.

Carriages at the end of the train tend to be noticeably quieter than those in the centre.
Not unless there is a busy entrance at certain stations but generally that tends to be the case.
I had this on a GWR Paddington-Bristol Temple Meads yesterday. Full of tourists going to Bath, and utterly packed at the rear - yet, in the front two carriages, there was loads of space, to the point that the Train Manager made an announcement after Swindon saying, "There are lots of unoccupied seats in carriage A and carriage B, if those who are standing wish to move further down the train." Not many people did...
Paddington's train brain seems a common condition amongst many a Paddington traveller....And not just There either as has been mentioned.
I was on an Avanti Voyager yesterday and people were choosing to stand in the vestibules despite the presence of several unreserved, unoccupied bays of 4 in the same carriage.
Again, certain people just seem content to do this, although Voyagers can often seem cramped when busy.
There's the root cause of your problem
Next time arrive earlier so you've time to find a seat
Precisely, turning up just 2 minutes before the train leaves is just madness, although it's not always the individuals fault.
Oh dear! Quel dommage!
Kids and students in groups on trains can be like flying ants.....
 

Dr_Paul

Established Member
Joined
3 Sep 2013
Messages
1,380
When the 455s were first introduced, people (including me) were reluctant to move to the carriage ends when all the seats were taken, because around the vestibule doors there were no wall-mounted handles or seat-top handles to hold on to, and standing without being able to hold on to anything isn't pleasant and is potentially dangerous. When the South-Western 455s were refurbished, they had handles fitted, and people were more inclined to move to the ends of the carriages. I'm not sure if something similar happened with the refurbishment of the Southern 455s.
 

infobleep

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
12,776
There's the root cause of your problem
Next time arrive earlier so you've time to find a seat

Now I was on the platform about 8 minutes before the train departed and the train departed 6 minutes late.

I didn't know I would need to spread out and once the train's departure time had passed, I had no idea when the guard would say enough, the train is full and we are departing
 
Last edited:

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
14,337
Location
St Albans
Oh dear! :)




People with above-average awareness / intelligence / aptitude should certainly be able to derive benefit from that, and this should be celebrated rather than shamed. We shouldn’t attempt to debase everything to the level of the dumbest.

It does sound like you’re making an argument for a 365-style train over a 700 though!
Not really. The IC style layout, (actually just that of a normal MK 1 TSO) has the problem that with end doors only, passengers exiting at a station completely block those in the vestibule trying to take the seats that have just been vacated. It doesn't really work that way with any 1/3, 2/3 door arrangement as the distance between access points and the crntre of each seating block is much less, so neither 365s nor 700s have that problem to be exploited.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,865
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
Not really. The IC style layout, (actually just that of a normal MK 1 TSO) has the problem that with end doors only, passengers exiting at a station completely block those in the vestibule trying to take the seats that have just been vacated. It doesn't really work that way with any 1/3, 2/3 door arrangement as the distance between access points and the crntre of each seating block is much less, so neither 365s nor 700s have that problem to be exploited.

Yes I’ve never really got the hatred on here for 1/3 2/3 door stock. I prefer it, even for longer distance journeys, as having the carriage divided up also gives a bit of privacy and somehow seems to filter out noise.

But I was more talking about walk-through. I just don’t see the benefits of it, compared to the disbenefits.
 

infobleep

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
12,776
For regular journeys people will sometimes work out which carriage they need to be in so that they are near the stairs/platform exit when they disembark so that they can make a quick a getaway and avoid being caught up in the crowd or having to walk half the length of the platform before exiting the station.
I do this but if the train is busy I prefer a seat.
JLE is the same, especially with Stratford being a major traffic generator and the entrance being at the end.

The Victoria Line is a good one, going south the north end of the train is always quieter, especially if the train has started from Seven Sisters. This used to be the case going north as well, but the Victoria station upgrade has changed that, now the south end is quietest. Likewise the rear car of Bakerloo trains going south can be very empty, it’s occasionally possible to have a car to one’s self for the whole journey from Queen’s Park to Elephant & Castle.
I use to go to the north end of Victoria when it was quieter but now there is no root to the platform that is quieter and avoids the need to walk down the platform. I appreciate why this is the case.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
14,337
Location
St Albans
Yes I’ve never really got the hatred on here for 1/3 2/3 door stock. I prefer it, even for longer distance journeys, as having the carriage divided up also gives a bit of privacy and somehow seems to filter out noise.

But I was more talking about walk-through. I just don’t see the benefits of it, compared to the disbenefits.
It seems from many posters here that the clientele on the services that ply the lines north of Finsbury Park aren't as pleasant to travel with as those on the 12-car trains on the MML. The ease with which boarding and alighting the 700s operates means that travel to/from the core is not unpleasant.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,971
Moving down the train can be laborious because fundamentally the loading gauge is rather small

There's not that much room once four seats are fitted in abreast.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
14,337
Location
St Albans
Moving down the train can be laborious because fundamentally the loading gauge is rather small

There's not that much room once four seats are fitted in abreast.
Just making my way to the centre of a car is simple enough, (I'm not talking about 2 + 3 seating) - much easier than bumping around in the (relative) gloom of the vestibule. Also the ride is a lot smoother midway between the bogies.
 

gazzaa2

Member
Joined
2 May 2018
Messages
833
On the Edinburgh to Glasgow Express services (eight carriages) it's can be common to depart with the rear coach full & standing but with empty tables of four in the front. One passenger told me it was too far to go just to get a seat - even though she would have had to have walked past it to exit the station at the other end.

If the service leaves from a non buffer end platform then wherever the stairs lead to will be the busiest carriage.

Most passengers generally remain in the carriage that they board - regardless of how busy it is, or becomes.

It's a lack of common sense.
 

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
2,588
Location
SW London
When the 455s were first introduced, people (including me) were reluctant to move to the carriage ends when all the seats were taken, because around the vestibule doors there were no wall-mounted handles or seat-top handles to hold on to, and standing without being able to hold on to anything isn't pleasant and is potentially dangerous. When the South-Western 455s were refurbished, they had handles fitted, and people were more inclined to move to the ends of the carriages. I'm not sure if something similar happened with the refurbishment of the Southern 455s.
Unfortunately, they also made it harder to stand, and in particular perch, in the gangways themselves, so everyone now crowds into the vestibule areas. And thgere were more standees anyway, as they removed about 20% of the seats.
 

Magdalia

Established Member
Joined
1 Jan 2022
Messages
3,128
Location
The Fens
People are very weird when it comes to being in the right place for their destination. On the GN out of King’s Cross, Hitchin is the worst for it. People start heading for the doors up to 10 minutes before arrival. I can, kind of, get this if it means a quicker exit from the car park, but I don’t believe this is the case for most people.
I did 30 years of commuting, mostly on the GN. I did a lot of "people watching". Nearly all of commuter behaviour is not weird it is rational. All commuters make frequent journeys with a very quick feedback loop to determine optimum tactics. In particular each commuter's optimum is a trade off between speed and comfort. The key factor in a fast commuting journey is to eliminate having to queue, either at the ticket barrier when leaving the platform, and, if driving, queuing to leave the car park. For those where speed is much more important than comfort, "pole position" for beating the queues is paramount. I knew by sight regular commuters who always stood, even when there were seats, for this reason.
The real benefit of being in the car was when the train approached the next stop, it was easy to see various seated passengers clearing the table of their belongings to alight. When the train actually stopped, I had the pick of the vacated seats, whilst the twits in the vestibule could only look at the queue of passengers coming towards them as they exited via the vestibule.

In the days when I stood on trains this was one of my key tactics for getting a seat as quickly as possible. On 1/3 and 2/3 door trains the optimum position is the middle saloon where passengers are exiting in both directions.

People with above-average awareness / intelligence / aptitude should certainly be able to derive benefit from that, and this should be celebrated rather than shamed. We shouldn’t attempt to debase everything to the level of the dumbest.

It does sound like you’re making an argument for a 365-style train over a 700 though!
No difference between class 365 and class 700 here.
Why? Because:
  1. When a packed commuter train releases the huddled masses you can easily spend 10 extra minutes queuing to get out of the station if you are at the other end of the train; on many lines most of the exits are at the same end of the platform, which exacerbates the problem of internal crowding.
  2. You usually have a limited amount of time to board, which means you do not have time to saunter along the platform looking for a less crowded carriage (again, exacerbated by having many platform exit/entrances at one end).
  3. It is difficult if not impossible to move along a full and standing carriage; this not only makes it hard to move within the train to find a less crowded area, it disinclines people to move away from the doors because they worry that they won’t be able to get out when their station is reached.
Not really. The IC style layout, (actually just that of a normal MK 1 TSO) has the problem that with end doors only, passengers exiting at a station completely block those in the vestibule trying to take the seats that have just been vacated. It doesn't really work that way with any 1/3, 2/3 door arrangement as the distance between access points and the crntre of each seating block is much less, so neither 365s nor 700s have that problem to be exploited.

Yes I’ve never really got the hatred on here for 1/3 2/3 door stock. I prefer it, even for longer distance journeys, as having the carriage divided up also gives a bit of privacy and somehow seems to filter out noise.

But I was more talking about walk-through. I just don’t see the benefits of it, compared to the disbenefits.
This is where the class 700 really scores. The wide aisles mean that it is nearly always possible to move along the train, and the passenger information system indicates which cars are less heavily loaded, so moving through the train is an informed choice not a speculative decision.
It seems from many posters here that the clientele on the services that ply the lines north of Finsbury Park aren't as pleasant to travel with as those on the 12-car trains on the MML. The ease with which boarding and alighting the 700s operates means that travel to/from the core is not unpleasant.
I have to stick up for GN commuters here, I don't think that they are any more unpleasant than anywhere else.

But the GN has lots of busy stations where queues form when trains unload. At Welwyn Garden and Stevenage the bottleneck is the stairs, at Hitchin it is the ticket barrier, at Royston it is the narrow exit to the car park at the very rear of the train. Hitchin and Royston also have very restricted car park exits where cars can queue for up to 10 minutes to get out, and it really pays to be in "pole position".
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,865
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
I did 30 years of commuting, mostly on the GN. I did a lot of "people watching". Nearly all of commuter behaviour is not weird it is rational. All commuters make frequent journeys with a very quick feedback loop to determine optimum tactics. In particular each commuter's optimum is a trade off between speed and comfort. The key factor in a fast commuting journey is to eliminate having to queue, either at the ticket barrier when leaving the platform, and, if driving, queuing to leave the car park. For those where speed is much more important than comfort, "pole position" for beating the queues is paramount. I knew by sight regular commuters who always stood, even when there were seats, for this reason.

In the case of Hitchin, I always found it irrational, as you’d have people getting up 10+ minutes early. I never did, in fact I would always wait until the train actually stopped before getting up, and the difference it made leaving the station was absolutely minimal.

The other one which used to get my back up was/is the people who insist on frantically charging to the front of the train just as the train arrived at King’s Cross. I don’t think I ever arrived at King’s Cross without at least one person doing it. In the days when I used the Brompton it was always mildly amusing to try and spoil this by unfolding the Brompton just at the right moment.

I have to stick up for GN commuters here, I don't think that they are any more unpleasant than anywhere else.

I’ve always found Stevenage disproportionately rude. Same applies on the A1(M) as well, they even manage to snarl that up every single morning!


But the GN has lots of busy stations where queues form when trains unload. At Welwyn Garden and Stevenage the bottleneck is the stairs, at Hitchin it is the ticket barrier, at Royston it is the narrow exit to the car park at the very rear of the train. Hitchin and Royston also have very restricted car park exits where cars can queue for up to 10 minutes to get out, and it really pays to be in "pole position".

In the case of Hitchin I’m not convinced it makes much difference, as being in front in practice often meant simply catching the tail end of the last train load.
 

RailWonderer

Established Member
Joined
25 Jul 2018
Messages
1,640
Location
All around the network
Should said 10-car 444 be substituted for a 5-car 444 however, then it all becomes a very different story indeed - hold on tight and be prepared to breathe in...!
I was with family and we took the 10:35 Weymouth on a sunny Friday in the June and it was only a booked 5 car. We only just missed the 05 so we got seated but it was sardines.
All the time on the Avanti services the reserved coaches are hammered and then U and G are quiet
Same on LNER and to an extent GWR (although I find GWR passengers make more of an effort to hunt for spare seats).

The Norwich IC (08:00 ex-Norwich) I was on yesterday was full and standing sardines front coach to rear. I had to wade through suitcases and standees to find one seat that a, let's say, rotund traveller was too big to fit into. There being no 07:30 didn't help either.
 

1D54

Member
Joined
1 Jun 2019
Messages
556
You often hear the train manager announce that there are plenty of seats available in coaches xxx and still people are happy standing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top