Anonymous10
Established Member
Controversial one but the class 153 holds many memories and was the start of many of my journeys and trips away over last few years.
Probably, maybe 20. Under the current plans AFAIK the West Coast Partnership franchise will still operate on the WCML, alongside HS2, so they may even be around after HS2 opens, albeit perhaps with the worst examples of the fleet scrapped by then.
Perhaps it was an ironic post?455s? Iconic?
Perhaps it was an ironic post?
Agreed, I must admit I wouldn't like 390049 if they left it in that skanky virgin interior, its undoubtedly the fleet member in the worst condition.The Class 390. Smoothest ride of any multiple unit in the UK, great seats, fairly good room, and a nice ambience.
As of turbos, yes they are brilliant trains with exception ride quality compared to other classes of a similar age, mine have been replaced by 196's however give me a chance and I will be back on one in no time.All the Sprinters types and the Turbos I will miss the most many enjoyable journeys spent on them over the years.
I don't know if I'll miss them exactly, but it'll be a watershed moment on the rail network the day the final Class 08 is withdrawn.
Indeed not!That won't be for a good few years yet
Yeah Voyagers are rather smooth operators at speedBelieve it or not, Voyagers!
At speed they are such a smooth ride compared to all that shuddering from the Hitachis. The lighting is subdued and warm making it feel quite relaxing, the seat back isn’t vertical so you don’t feel like you’re being forced to sit bolt upright for 4 hours. The seats are also not slightly less comfortable than a park bench like they are on the hitachi, they are actually very comfortable.
Having an accessible toilet in every coach is also to be applauded (but not by many on here, probably who just don’t appreciate how much easier they make life for many people). We need to make our railways more accessible, not less.
It’s not the designer of the train to blame for the overcrowding, it’s the government for trying and failing to stifle growth on XC.
Don’t get me wrong, I’d rather not have a throbbing diesel engine under my backside, but if I must, I’d choose this over an 80x on seat comfort alone.
Like the HSTs before them, they have carried me many many thousands of miles over the years and I’m dreading a possible future without these little powerhouses as the government is obviously only interested in getting people to and around London by rail!
That’s what I thought, could you get any less remarkable of a train455s? Iconic?
The JR500s would look next generation if we got them over here in the UK. That is a design that was far beyond its time.Shinkansen sets are generally 20 year life ( other than the N500s which seem to be going on forever ) - but I'm not sure the narrow gauge stock has such a short lifetime. I found it very hard to dig up any news about Hitachi non-Shinkansen output but I think I did find something about problems there too... perhaps someone who can read Japanese better than I can have a look.
I wonder if there's more problems trying to fix the cracking...
100% agreeBelieve it or not, Voyagers!
At speed they are such a smooth ride compared to all that shuddering from the Hitachis. The lighting is subdued and warm making it feel quite relaxing, the seat back isn’t vertical so you don’t feel like you’re being forced to sit bolt upright for 4 hours. The seats are also not slightly less comfortable than a park bench like they are on the hitachi, they are actually very comfortable.
Don’t agree with that at all though. Eight accessible toilets on a pair of 221s is ludicrous.Having an accessible toilet in every coach is also to be applauded
Very well said, although the main issue was not ordering enough to run all in pairs or in longer formations, but again not Bombardier’s fault.It’s not the designer of the train to blame for the overcrowding, it’s the government for trying and failing to stifle growth on XC.
1000%The Class 390. Smoothest ride of any multiple unit in the UK, great seats, fairly good room, and a nice ambience.
OK, I’ll compromise with you, 1 in 1st and 2 in standard, that leaves either 1 or 2 coaches without depending on if it’s 4 or 5 car sets. That should make room for probably 8 seats on a 4 car and maybe 16 on a 5 car? XC could then boast that they have increased the capacity by thousands of seats per year as we live in an age of BS spin! Actually, that space could be used for a couple of extra seats and some much needed luggage space.Don’t agree with that at all though. Eight accessible toilets on a pair of 221s is ludicrous.
Absolutely agree. Although it's easy to look at the old guard through rose-tinted spectacles, I genuinely do think they are better trains overall than their replacement. Much better seating, far superior ride quality, you can trust one to get you home and they sound great too. It's not like the Southern 313s for example where the newer 377s are clearly superior.I will certainly miss the 507 and 508 units because despite what anybody might say about them, they have been in my opinion the best trains in Merseyside ( Wirral and Northern Lines ) and as far as I am concerned, they always will be.
For me it's got to be the 444. Over 20 years service so far, reliable all the way. Extremely comfortable trains which offer a quiet experience to passengers. I'd even go as far as to call them easily the best 3rd rail trains in the country.
My most travelled on class of train (in fact I'm about to go on one in a couple of hours!).
It's sad as anything that replaces them will be a downgrade... We should really aim for more trains like 444s.
In their original layout, definitely. The last proper express train on the Southern.Class 442
I feel that way with the Jubilee line.1973 stock (LU) - For me, these aren't just a part of the Piccadilly line, they ARE the Piccadilly line. When you think of that line, you naturally associate it with the 73 stock and it will be weird when this is no longer reality.
That reminds me, I’m going to miss sitting at the front on the Tyne & Wear once those new trains are in.VERY unpopular opinion incoming:
DLR B90/B92/B2K stock.
They are very worn out at this point, and the oldest ones having almost 35 years of service life is not bad at all for what they are. BUT, as with the posts above, they ARE the DLR in my eyes, and I find they are full of character in many ways. Plus I'm not a huge fan of longitudinal seating, and opportunities to sit forward facing on the DLR will be much reduced when these go!