• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

LNER to pilot removal of Off-Peak tickets

BRX

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2008
Messages
3,649
I've got to admit that I was aware of and happy with the change to single pricing, but wasn't aware that the annoying route York limitation had been put in. Since lockdown I've mostly been focusing on getting Lumos or going first class to avoid LNERs standard seating.

It would be good to have this death-by-a-thousand-cuts process documented in detail, over time, to make clear the effect of what has been lost/changed cumulatively.

There are certain journeys which through the various stages of this "simplification" have lost
- break-of-journey opportunities on return legs of returns
- any-permitted routing
- the off-peak/super off peak shoulder fares
- the off peak fares cap altogether
- all-day fare flexibility

All coupled with various fare increases introduced under cover, and LNER fiddling with reservations to give travellers the impression they can't travel on a certain train when in fact they can.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

AdamWW

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2012
Messages
3,710
It would be good to have this death-by-a-thousand-cuts process documented in detail, over time, to make clear the effect of what has been lost/changed cumulatively.

All coupled with various fare increases introduced under cover, and LNER fiddling with reservations to give travellers the impression they can't travel on a certain train when in fact they can.

Look on the bright side.

There's not much left they can do to make things worse.

(Can they?)
 

kkong

Member
Joined
8 Sep 2008
Messages
535
Look on the bright side.

There's not much left they can do to make things worse.

(Can they?)

Well, they can pull all the Advance / Semi-Flex tickets from sale whenever they feel like it (e.g. disruption).
 

takno

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2016
Messages
5,109
All coupled with various fare increases introduced under cover, and LNER fiddling with reservations to give travellers the impression they can't travel on a certain train when in fact they can.

Honestly I think that single change, smuggled in without consultation under cover of Covid, is the biggest cause of all problems. You can't go about pretending that people can't get half the trains with their flexible ticket, and then say that nobody is using the flexible tickets. The single fare pricing basically made things simpler for most passengers, but every single other change has seemed like a shifty way to advance an agenda that makes no sense. They really should have cleared out the dreadful Virgin management when they got rid of Stagecoach as an owning group.
 

A S Leib

Member
Joined
9 Sep 2018
Messages
792
Look on the bright side.

There's not much left they can do to make things worse.

(Can they?)
Do TOCs with seat reservations have to offer them for free (excluding Sleeper berth supplements)? At this point, I wouldn't be surprised if they wanted to copy SNCF and Renfe and insisted on charging extra for seat reservations for Peterborough – London or Darlington – Newcastle if they could.
 

takno

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2016
Messages
5,109
Do TOCs with seat reservations have to offer them for free (excluding Sleeper berth supplements)? At this point, I wouldn't be surprised if they wanted to copy SNCF and Renfe and insisted on charging extra for seat reservations for Peterborough – London or Darlington – Newcastle if they could.
I think it would make sense to charge for seat reservations and remove them from the equation for advances, or at the very least charge for the ability to select your own seat. Not only is that what their beloved airline industry does anyway, but it's actually more important for the rail industry, since short distance passengers picking and choosing seats are one of the key things removing capacity for people who want to go all the way on these trains. I'd also support a strict one-reservation-per-ticket policy, so people aren't using open tickets to book multiple trains. Of course if sensible revenue-neutral fares reform was the plan these would be the first things they were looking at, but instead they went nuclear.
 

sheff1

Established Member
Joined
24 Dec 2009
Messages
5,496
Location
Sheffield
I think it would make sense to charge for seat reservations and remove them from the equation for advances, or at the very least charge for the ability to select your own seat.
I hope you are not suggesting that LNER start charging for seat reservations I (and no doubt others) do not want.
 

takno

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2016
Messages
5,109
I hope you are not suggesting that LNER start charging for seat reservations I (and no doubt others) do not want.
I'm suggesting that a potential solution for the mix of imagined and self-created capacity problems that LNER are suffering would be to charge a premium for selecting your own seat, particularly for shorter journeys where people are less likely to actually care. That would (theoretically) allow them to maximise usage of seats without going overboard blaming the wicked open-ticket-holders. In terms of charging to make seat reservations full stop, I wouldn't be particularly unhappy with that as an outcome but appreciate that it would be an extremely unpopular move with others.
 

MrJeeves

Established Member
Joined
28 Aug 2015
Messages
2,026
Location
Burgess Hill
I hope you are not suggesting that LNER start charging for seat reservations I (and no doubt others) do not want.
Quite honestly, I see it as a good solution to an industry-wide problem of reserved seats not being used and walk up tickets taking it away from advance capacity just because someone had to pick train X when booking (and ended up with a seat reservation).

It works well in most of continental Europe as far as I'm aware, and a small nominal fee of, say, £1 would deter people from needlessly booking seats or convince them to cancel existing seats or change reservations to a different service etc.

The main thing is that the fee would have to be high enough to not be holy consumed by card transaction fees. It would also make standalone reservation tools more achievable for third party retailers as they wouldn't have to risk someone making ridiculous amounts of reservations and costing them money through whichever supplier(s) they use to connect to the reservations system.

That being said I wouldn't want to pay the fee myself, so... :p

self-created capacity problems that LNER are suffering would be to charge a premium for selecting your own seat
That one isn't really possible unless LNER were to just implement that on their own site. They couldn't really enforce that for third party retailers (for the few that do seat selection).
 

Tim_UK

Member
Joined
9 Jan 2019
Messages
157
They'd be happy for you to fly as trains between Scotland and London at the busiest times are very full. There is nowhere near sufficient capacity to cater for all the people who would use the train for this journey, if prices were reasonable.
And therefore a making it too confusing is a valid way out. Just make it so confusing, you can't be arsed and just travel a different way.

Like the people on my LNER train a few weeks ago who had paid for weekend first before, so sat in first class on a Thursday thinking it was a standard thing. £170+ each later. They paid, because they were honest people. I think the guard would probably have been ok with them legging it back into standard. At least you know easyjet are going to stiff you £8 for a coffee.

You have to ask whether you are collected a valid economic rent from the service. Or whether you are just ripping off people who have no choice. It is still ripping off, even if the fare is just expensed by people whoose employers ask no questions. (That's not to say that economic incentives for people to travel on quieter servces are not valid)

I remember once, coming back from Edinburgh about 8 years ago. Walk up fare to Glasgow, a night in premier inn and Transpennine Express to Manchester came out at least £100 per person cheaper than an LNER train from Edinburgh. It is all about what you know, tricks and asking for the right thing.


In a way, in 1997 when I used to wander into the station (Huddersfield) and have a chat in the ticket office, before this time is this much, and after is this much. It was a simpler time. Still loads of money.

Another friend (north east based) would walk to the station and ask how much, walk to the car hire place and ask how much, add the fuel, and decide purely on money. The car hire place usually won.
And, it is kind of screwed now, but TP express between Manchester an Leeds was purely a victim of it's own success. 2tph to Liverpool, 30 mins from Hudds to Manchester. Suddenly way more people turn up and it's rammed. You could run the whole timetable with 8 car trains and the would be full.

Interestingly I remember from school French lessons that way back when (i guess 80s or earlier) SNCF used to let you book a reservation on one train and then an insurance train as well in case you missed it (though the tickets were walk up). I forget the word for it though.
We live in such a connected world, where a change of ticket is technically just a click away. On your phone, at a booking office, or a ticket machine.

How you price a change, is another thing. But there is no technical barrier to cancelling a reservation on 1 train and moving it to another.

From an airline perspective, in 2008, I arrived in New Zealand a day late due to a technical problem on the plane. I wandered to the booking desk and said, 'Hi, can I move my flight home a day later because I arrived a day later', `what's your booking reference`, <5 seconds> `all done, here is a print out`


It's about adopting a 'can do' attitude, rather than a 'punish idiots' attitude.
 
Last edited:

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,177
Location
Yorks
Quite honestly, I see it as a good solution to an industry-wide problem of reserved seats not being used and walk up tickets taking it away from advance capacity just because someone had to pick train X when booking (and ended up with a seat reservation).

It works well in most of continental Europe as far as I'm aware, and a small nominal fee of, say, £1 would deter people from needlessly booking seats or convince them to cancel existing seats or change reservations to a different service etc.

The main thing is that the fee would have to be high enough to not be holy consumed by card transaction fees. It would also make standalone reservation tools more achievable for third party retailers as they wouldn't have to risk someone making ridiculous amounts of reservations and costing them money through whichever supplier(s) they use to connect to the reservations system.

That being said I wouldn't want to pay the fee myself, so... :p


That one isn't really possible unless LNER were to just implement that on their own site. They couldn't really enforce that for third party retailers (for the few that do seat selection).

I've said this on threads before, but just making reservations request only would cut out a lot of waste. A lot of people with AP tickets aren't interested in them.
 

Hadders

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
27 Apr 2011
Messages
13,287
Ri’m not in favour of charging for seat reservations. Just imagine what TOCs would try to do.

Window seat - that’ll be an extra £5
Want a table - £5 extra
We’ll sell you seat reservation with no view for £1.

Then, what happens when things go wrong? If reservations aren’t displayed (let’s face it this happens regularly) who is going to refund passengers? How much is the admin to do this going to cost?

What if a connecting train is delayed such that I miss the train with my ‘premium’ seat reservation? Who’s going to sort that out. Train companies struggle to get delay repay claims right - throw in a missing seat reservation and it’ll be a nightmare.

Charges for seat reservations is a complete no go for me. A train is not a plane.
 

Wallsendmag

Established Member
Joined
11 Dec 2014
Messages
5,245
Location
Wallsend or somewhere in GB
Ri’m not in favour of charging for seat reservations. Just imagine what TOCs would try to do.

Window seat - that’ll be an extra £5
Want a table - £5 extra
We’ll sell you seat reservation with no view for £1.

Then, what happens when things go wrong? If reservations aren’t displayed (let’s face it this happens regularly) who is going to refund passengers? How much is the admin to do this going to cost?

What if a connecting train is delayed such that I miss the train with my ‘premium’ seat reservation? Who’s going to sort that out. Train companies struggle to get delay repay claims right - throw in a missing seat reservation and it’ll be a nightmare.

Charges for seat reservations is a complete no go for me. A train is not a plane.
Do GWR still have the £5 charge for seat reservations if you book them after you buy your ticket?
 

takno

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2016
Messages
5,109
Ri’m not in favour of charging for seat reservations. Just imagine what TOCs would try to do.

Window seat - that’ll be an extra £5
Want a table - £5 extra
We’ll sell you seat reservation with no view for £1.

Then, what happens when things go wrong? If reservations aren’t displayed (let’s face it this happens regularly) who is going to refund passengers? How much is the admin to do this going to cost?

What if a connecting train is delayed such that I miss the train with my ‘premium’ seat reservation? Who’s going to sort that out. Train companies struggle to get delay repay claims right - throw in a missing seat reservation and it’ll be a nightmare.

Charges for seat reservations is a complete no go for me. A train is not a plane.
As it stands LNER are on the hook for a large refund if you don't get your assigned seat for whatever reason, and have a scheme in place to pay for that. Charging reservations (or more importantly stopping giving them out like candy even when people don't want them) should actually make all of the problems you mention easier.

A train is not a plane, and as a result seat reservations are much more complex and costly to administer, so we should move back to a system where the normal thing to do is to just walk into the train and find a seat, rather than playing an exciting guessing game of "does the orange light fit in with my journey, and will all the red lights even turn up". I don't think you need to charge to make this work, but I suspect it might help.
 

AdamWW

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2012
Messages
3,710
Do GWR still have the £5 charge for seat reservations if you book them after you buy your ticket?

No. That was a long time ago, I think.

As it stands LNER are on the hook for a large refund if you don't get your assigned seat for whatever reason, and have a scheme in place to pay for that.

How much do you get?

Normally the rule is just the refund of the (zero) reservation fee, isn't it?
 

Hadders

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
27 Apr 2011
Messages
13,287
As it stands LNER are on the hook for a large refund if you don't get your assigned seat for whatever reason, and have a scheme in place to pay for that. Charging reservations (or more importantly stopping giving them out like candy even when people don't want them) should actually make all of the problems you mention easier.
Say I travel from Arlesey to Peterborough with GTR then catch a LNER train from Peterborough to York.

GTR’s train is late and I miss my connection at Peterborough on which I have a premium seat reservation. I claim delay repay from GTR as they caused the delay.

Who is sorting out the seat reservation fee?

A train is not a plane, and as a result seat reservations are much more complex and costly to administer, so we should move back to a system where the normal thing to do is to just walk into the train and find a seat, rather than playing an exciting guessing game of "does the orange light fit in with my journey, and will all the red lights even turn up". I don't think you need to charge to make this work, but I suspect it might help.
I don’t think that’s feasible for long distance travel, especially where people want to sit together (eg families with children), or the infirm.
 

JamesT

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2015
Messages
2,729
How much do you get?

Normally the rule is just the refund of the (zero) reservation fee, isn't it?
If that happens, and our staff can't assist you in finding an alternative seat, our Seat Guarantee scheme lets you claim compensation. Here’s how it works:

If you had a one way ticket, we’ll compensate you 100% of the value
If you had a return ticket, we’ll compensate you 50% of the value
If you had a First Class ticket and the only seat available is in Standard, we’ll compensate you the difference between the fare you paid and the Standard equivalent
 

AdamWW

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2012
Messages
3,710

Wow. That's surpisingly generous. (Unlike the rest of their fare policy!)

Good thing for GWR they don't have such a scheme given how often a 9 or 10 coach train ends up as 5 coaches.
 

BRX

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2008
Messages
3,649
Is there some technical limitation of the existing reservations system that means you can't stop people making multiple reservations attached to the same ticket?
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
15,458
Is there some technical limitation of the existing reservations system that means you can't stop people making multiple reservations attached to the same ticket?
Yes, reservations are (mostly) unconnected with specific tickets.
 

JamesT

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2015
Messages
2,729
Wow. That's surpisingly generous. (Unlike the rest of their fare policy!)

Good thing for GWR they don't have such a scheme given how often a 9 or 10 coach train ends up as 5 coaches.
GWR do have such a scheme, though not quite as generous. https://www.gwr.com/help-and-support/faqs/compensation-and-refunds - "Can I get compensation if I didn't get a seat on the train"
We'd always recommend reserving a seat in advance to avoid disappointment. This is free of charge and can be done at the same time you buy your ticket, or through our Customer Support and Social Media teams.

if you reserved a Standard seat but had to stand for your whole journey, because neither your booked seat nor an alternative seat was available, we will provide compensation; this will be 50% of the cost of a single ticket, or 25% if you have a return
if you have a First Class ticket and no seats are available in First Class but you were able to get a seat in Standard or had to stand in First Class, then we’ll refund the difference between the First Class ticket held and the equivalent Standard ticket; if there are no available seats in Standard, we will cover the full cost of the affected journey
if you have a Season Ticket, we’ll work this out based on its daily rate, not the cost of the journey
To claim compensation, we’ll need a copy of your ticket, reservation, and journey details.
 

MrJeeves

Established Member
Joined
28 Aug 2015
Messages
2,026
Location
Burgess Hill
I've said this on threads before, but just making reservations request only would cut out a lot of waste. A lot of people with AP tickets aren't interested in them.
It's not particularly easy to do considering the way AP tickets increase in price is the reservation availability on the train.
Then, what happens when things go wrong? If reservations aren’t displayed (let’s face it this happens regularly) who is going to refund passengers?
Ah, that's something I didn't really think about!

Your later mention of GTR reminded me about counted place, which would be a complete scam to charge for.
 

Krokodil

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2023
Messages
2,722
Location
Wales
Ri’m not in favour of charging for seat reservations. Just imagine what TOCs would try to do.

Window seat - that’ll be an extra £5
Want a table - £5 extra
We’ll sell you seat reservation with no view for £1.

Then, what happens when things go wrong? If reservations aren’t displayed (let’s face it this happens regularly) who is going to refund passengers? How much is the admin to do this going to cost?

What if a connecting train is delayed such that I miss the train with my ‘premium’ seat reservation? Who’s going to sort that out. Train companies struggle to get delay repay claims right - throw in a missing seat reservation and it’ll be a nightmare.

Charges for seat reservations is a complete no go for me. A train is not a plane.
As the government appear to view Ryanair as the model for how our railways should be run, they'll love that.
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,269
Location
Wittersham Kent
I'm suggesting that a potential solution for the mix of imagined and self-created capacity problems that LNER are suffering would be to charge a premium for selecting your own seat, particularly for shorter journeys where people are less likely to actually care. That would (theoretically) allow them to maximise usage of seats without going overboard blaming the wicked open-ticket-holders. In terms of charging to make seat reservations full stop, I wouldn't be particularly unhappy with that as an outcome but appreciate that it would be an extremely unpopular move with others.
It wouldbe a great to increase LNER revenue. £8.99 for a airline seat with no window, £9.99 Airline seat with Window, 12.99 airline seat with extra leg room, 14.99 for table seat. Then of course theres speedy boarding if you want to get on the train more than 5 minutes before departure then luggage costs.
 

Top