• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Transpennine Route Upgrade and Electrification updates

Manutd1999

Member
Joined
21 Feb 2021
Messages
386
Location
UK
I understand the frustration. Yes the works are complex, yes we need to minimise disruption and yes there are external (political) factors. But it still shouldn't take 8 years to upgrade 29km.....
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

MatthewHutton

Member
Joined
17 Aug 2024
Messages
155
Location
Oxford
Government cash flow then?

If spending more quickly meant you got the benefits quicker then that would be something you could persuade the treasury to do I am sure.

They are politicians. They want it done before the next election if possible.

If the industry doesn't challenge itself over time and cost enhancements will continue to wither on the vine.
This is precisely why the “cost per mile” people have been so persuasive.
 

CdBrux

Member
Joined
4 Mar 2014
Messages
850
Location
Munich
If spending more quickly meant you got the benefits quicker then that would be something you could persuade the treasury to do I am sure.

They are politicians. They want it done before the next election if possible.
Borrowing costs and market reaction are not overly favourable right now
 

LittleAH

Member
Joined
24 Oct 2018
Messages
1,147
Not really. There’s no justification of building NPR without HS2 and TRU will already deliver the increase in service as well as moderate journey time improvements.

Edit: apologies. This was in response to Andrewe
 

nr758123

Member
Joined
3 Jun 2014
Messages
547
Location
West Yorkshire
not if we had a Huddersfield to Oldham Pennine Base Tunnel...
They are talking about the tunnel only going as far as Marsden, so all the trains would still use this section.
That presupposes that the announcement of a new line from Manchester to Marsden, as part of the Integrated Rail Plan (remember that?), was anything more than a press release intended to enable Grant Shapps, on the day that he cancelled HS2 eastern leg to Leeds, to go on regional TV and say that high speed rail would still be coming to Yorkshire.
 

MatthewHutton

Member
Joined
17 Aug 2024
Messages
155
Location
Oxford
That presupposes that the announcement of a new line from Manchester to Marsden, as part of the Integrated Rail Plan (remember that?), was anything more than a press release intended to enable Grant Shapps, on the day that he cancelled HS2 eastern leg to Leeds, to go on regional TV and say that high speed rail would still be coming to Yorkshire.
A faster line connecting Darlington and Newcastle could have value IMO - that section is currently not as fast as some of the others.
 

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
9,325
Location
Dalton GA USA & Preston Lancs

The latest Sarah Bell video is out o.n YouTube featuring/focusing on Heaton Lodge Jct and Deighton. Mainly visible update but hopefully the notes below will help.
Deighton - 12/02/25
Huge earthworks continue
2 x 90m platforms currently being lengthened.
2 tracks being increased to 4 tracks. Whole corridor being widened.
2 slow tracks will have platforms but the 2 fast tracks being built will have no platforms allowing passing.

Heaton Lodge 13/02/25
Huge earthworks continue
0.8 mile curve of extra track will smooth out the curve
2 tracks being increased to 4 tracks. In a cutting to minimise visual impact.
One of biggest worksites on whole of TRU project. Grade separated junction was considered here but, in the end, went for Ravensthorpe at design stage to minimise environmental impact.
It is claimed 8 extra paths per hour will result!?? Wow

B1168 Colne Bridge 13/02/25
Replacement bridge under construction
Reinforced concrete abutments.
 
Last edited:

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
7,240
Location
Surrey

The latest Sarah Bell video is out o.n YouTube featuring/focusing on Heaton Lodge Jct and Deighton. Mainly visible update but hopefully the notes below will help.
Deighton - 12/02/25
Huge earthworks continue
2 x 90m platforms currently being lengthened.
2 tracks being increased to 4 tracks. Whole corridor being widened.
2 slow tracks will have platforms but the 2 fast tracks being built will have no platforms allowing passing.

Heaton Lodge 13/02/25
Huge earthworks continue
0.8 mile curve of extra track will smooth out the curve
2 tracks being increased to 4 tracks. In a cutting to minimise visual impact.
One of biggest worksites on whole of TRU project. Grade separated junction was considered here but, in the end, went for Ravensthorpe at design stage to minimise environmental impact.
It is claimed 8 extra paths per hour will result!?? Wow

B1168 Colne Bridge 13/02/25
Replacement bridge under construction
Reinforced concrete abutments.
Good to see that even in todays heavily constrained world of men&machines not mixing with running trains that significant works are being progressed during normal operations.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,077
You only have to watch Sarah's videos to realise why TRU is not happened as quick as WCML north electrification! The size of those earthworks at Deighton.
 
Last edited:

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
9,325
Location
Dalton GA USA & Preston Lancs
You only have to watch Sarah's videos to realise why TRU is not happened as quick as WCNL north electrification! The size of those earthworks at Deighton.
I agree. I love watching her videos as they are action packed and give a good overview of the sheer scale of some of the works. MML may result in more route mileage getting electrified but TPU project seems more immense somehow.

(btw what is WCNL please?)
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,077
I agree. I love watching her videos as they are action packed and give a good overview of the sheer scale of some of the works. MML may result in more route mileage getting electrified but TPU project seems more immense somehow.

(btw what is WCNL please?)
It's what people with fat fingers typing in a morning call the WCML...
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
14,945
Location
Bristol
Thanks lol! The Poplars link? does Western to North London line and is being electrified at a large cost per mile so I was truly wondering.
To be fair at a complexity per mile basis the Poplars project probably also scores quite high.
 

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
9,325
Location
Dalton GA USA & Preston Lancs
There is yet another Sarah Bell video update on YouTube specifically about Mirfield station. To comply with forum rules, I will only post a link on Monday so that I can annotate it as it is very visual with not many words. But well worth a watch imho
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
7,240
Location
Surrey
You only have to watch Sarah's videos to realise why TRU is not happened as quick as WCML north electrification! The size of those earthworks at Deighton.
Majority of the big scale civil works is able to take place off the operating infrastructure which enables continuous working unlike the WCML which even with the lower safety standards of the day still needed possessions to deliver anything meaningful.

All the why costs remain eye wateringly high on railway projects we are unlikely to see any further enhancements works progressed.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,077
Majority of the big scale civil works is able to take place off the operating infrastructure which enables continuous working unlike the WCML which even with the lower safety standards of the day still needed possessions to deliver anything meaningful.

All the why costs remain eye wateringly high on railway projects we are unlikely to see any further enhancements works progressed.
That doesn't bring down the cost that much. Adjacent Line Open work is still expensive. As is making sure your earthworks work doesn't affect line speed trains. It is not Greenfield construction by any measure.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
26,591
Location
Nottingham
Thanks lol! The Poplars link? does Western to North London line and is being electrified at a large cost per mile so I was truly wondering.

To be fair at a complexity per mile basis the Poplars project probably also scores quite high.
For a start it's very short so the fixed costs of running a project can't be spread out over a larger area. It also needs to work round several other electrification and track upgrades in close proximity, some affecting other parts of the same structures.
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
7,240
Location
Surrey
That doesn't bring down the cost that much. Adjacent Line Open work is still expensive. As is making sure your earthworks work doesn't affect line speed trains. It is not Greenfield construction by any measure.
This is high street environment not pure adjacent line open working which im not sure NR really supports these days.
 

Tim_UK

Member
Joined
9 Jan 2019
Messages
174
The size of those earthworks at Deighton.

They are huge.
And consider you have houses on 2 sides. And there is the old midland line through the site too - now the Greenway cycle track. The whole line of the old midland route used as a linear tip in the past. There will be all kinds of stuff dug up.



The Heaton Lodge site is also huge.
 

Revaulx

Member
Joined
17 Sep 2019
Messages
509
Location
Saddleworth
I can understand why the earthworks at Heaton Lodge and Ravensthorpe are huge as they are for either all-new or significantly widened trackbeds.

Why the need at Deighton though? It was always four track there. Is it because in the four track days there wasn’t a station on the main line?
 
Joined
1 Nov 2021
Messages
204
Location
Berwick
I can understand why the earthworks at Heaton Lodge and Ravensthorpe are huge as they are for either all-new or significantly widened trackbeds.

Why the need at Deighton though? It was always four track there. Is it because in the four track days there wasn’t a station on the main line?
When there were four tracks Deighton Station wasn’t on the mainline it was on the Kirkburton branch, so they need to get the station off the trackbed
 
Last edited:

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
18,490
Location
Yorkshire
When there were four tracks Deighton Station wasn’t on the mainline it was on the Kirkheaton branch, so they need to get the station off the trackbed
It was the Kirkburton branch, though it did call at Kirkheaton. The junction for that branch was also to the left right (in the Leeds direction) whereas the slow lines in the new layout will be to the right left (again in the direction of Leeds).
 
Last edited:

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
9,151
It was the Kirkburton branch, though it did call at Kirkheaton. The junction for that branch was also to the left (in the Leeds direction) whereas the slow lines in the new layout will be to the right (again in the direction of Leeds).
Slow lines will be on the left/west side. Fast lines to the east so they can cut the corner off at Heaton Lodge.
 

Top