My apologies, I wasn’t trying to say you were.I had no problem with the 175s. I was just pointing out that the 1830 was booked for a 2 car which was very often full leaving Manchester.
My point was some people (not yourself) make out like the 175’s were totally perfect and that the 197’s ruined everything.
Naughty 175’s providing a good and useful rail service !! But truthfully, as I’ve said before, I do totally understand and I wish that all the mk4 diagrams would go to Swansea but we know it’s just not possible with the 67’s fuel capacity.I know, fancy accusing the 175s of delivering a through train to Swansea after 16:30 from Manchester
I think calling it a vanity project Isn’t too fair either, they set out to provide a higher quality train service with first class and a full kitchen capability, which they’ve done (when it runs of course). And I wouldn’t be all too surprised if they’d have liked it to keep through connections too but when it was looked at, couldn’t be done.In all seriousness the Mk4 vanity project destroyed connectivity and then when the TfW control do not even hold the connection for a minute then you know why there might be one or two harks back to better days.
Yes, the future will be better, but it could have been a much better transfer.
Worth always remembering that we are still all paying for the 175s that we stare out of the too often 2 carriages to look at in the sidings near Crewe.
It could have been better, in more ways than 1! There’s certainly better trains the 197’s (even though I like them).
This hand back phase would have to happen at someone I suppose.