Almost certainly, fairly easy to create a 'film set' replica. As an example the whole outdoor set of Emmerdale was completed in 21 days.Will Japan be getting a replica kings cross ?
Will Japan be getting a replica kings cross ?
I believe the Japanese train was gifted to the NRM.Is it really a big issue that this loco has been exported to Japan? There are other surviving members of its class in the UK, so it’s not as if it were the last example of a class being exported.
It‘s worth remembering that we do have a Japanese train on display in the UK too. We don’t hear people from Japan calling for the NRM’s Shinkansen carriage to be repatriated back to Japan, so why should there be any talk of bringing this loco back from Japan in the future?
Almost certainly, fairly easy to create a 'film set' replica. As an example the whole outdoor set of Emmerdale was completed in 21 days.
Steam locos would presumably fall under "other items", which need to meet a £65,000 threshold of value before needing an export license.If it was, would the export deferral scheme be applicable to a steam loco? Coincidentally this was the subject of a review about a year ago https://www.gov.uk/government/news/...-save-important-cultural-items-for-the-public
It's not only the new build Shinkansen routes that are standard gauge in Japan. There are also a fair number of lower-speed lines in the suburban and regional category using 1435mm, as well as the Mini-Shinkansen gauge converted branches! Nonetheless, 83% of route mileage is Cape Gauge.How long before someone gets the crayons to start planning for it to feature in a plandampf event over the Shinkansen network?![]()
Why? The other GWR kettle came back from Australia.The chances of 4920 ever returning to the UK would seem to be almost zero.
And two ex Southern locos M7 30053, and Schools 30926 came back from the USA.Two streamlined locomotives came back from North America for two years as part of the anniversary of the speed record and the Flying Scotsman was also repatriated.
There’s a similar question being asked on Nat Pres, but the allegations are that certain members of its former owning group knew what was going to happen to it, but kept other members in the dark as they thought the sale might be vetoed, how true all this is I wouldn’t know but the plot thickens as they say.In terms of national preservation 4920 is not important but it should be born in mind that it is the oldest surviving Hall. What concerns me are the unanswered questions. Were the society aware that WCR had sold the loco to Warner Bros for a theme park in Japan and what consultation took place with the membership regarding the loco's sale and eventual destination (it seems the society had no idea the loco had been sold on for export). It also poses the question that when the scheme was launched to save the loco back in the seventies it was a general public appeal to donate. What about the members of the general public who donated towards the appeal. it would seem there has been almost zero consultation with stakeholders before the sale which is a slap in the face. As for the general consensus that the sale was to ensure a viable working future for the loco, well that went out the window. The chances of 4920 ever returning to the UK would seem to be almost zero.
also the 0-4-4 tank Dunrobin was repatriated from Canada to Beamish (2011).And two ex Southern locos M7 30053, and Schools 30926 came back from the USA.
If that is true, surely it could lead to legal action?There’s a similar question being asked on Nat Pres, but the allegations are that certain members of its former owning group knew what was going to happen to it, but kept other members in the dark as they thought the sale might be vetoed, how true all this is I wouldn’t know but the plot thickens as they say.
One could perhaps launch legal action over the concealing of the buyer thoughSurely when an object is sold the previous owners can have no further claim on or power over it ?
One could perhaps launch legal action over the concealing of the buyer though
But if the society were persuaded to agree to sell on the understanding that it was being sold to WCRC (who would likely restore it and run it), when certain key figures knew full well it was being bought by WCRC purely to be sold or hired onto WB for export, society members could rightfully argue that they were deliberately misled and therefore led to take a decision they wouldn’t otherwise have taken, if that makes sense?
If a group was misled into making a sale unaware that the third party had a buyer offering significantly more for an onward sale would that not be considered obtaining goods by deception?Again, that is a good point, but I'm not sure what legal redress they could have once they had the money and the loco was no longer theirs ?
I have no problems about the loco going to Japan. My one concern is that at some time in the future, due to a fall in business or a change in direction, the loco will become surplus to requirements and be unceremoniously disposed of.
Except that clearly, despite languishing in a siding for the best part of 23 years, it was still feasible to overhaul, albeit at great expense. If it’s ‘unceremoniously disposed of’ in Japan, it will be lost forever.I gather it hasn't moved under its own steam since 1999. 'Unceremoniously disposed of' isn't that much different to languishing on the scrap line at heritage railways various really.
Except that clearly, despite languishing in a siding for the best part of 23 years, it was still feasible to overhaul, albeit at great expense. If it’s ‘unceremoniously disposed of’ in Japan, it will be lost forever.
I don't think anyone is automatically assuming it will be scrapped if no longer required. I think some people are just concerned that this might be a possibility if WB have bought it outright and without a contractual agreement to return it when they're finished with it.It seems rash to assume it will be automatically scrapped in Japan if no longer required.
I agree that it was feasible to overhaul it, but 23 years is a long time for nobody to bother really getting the thumb out.
I’ve heard approaches were made by interested parties for a restore and run agreement but those high up are alleged to have to been happy about it.It seems rash to assume it will be automatically scrapped in Japan if no longer required.
I agree that it was feasible to overhaul it, but 23 years is a long time for nobody to bother really getting the thumb out.