RJ
Established Member
Which makes the theoretical capacity numbers a nonsense, as nobody is going to go to the back if they know they'll never be able to get out when they want.
Buses in this country never seem to have solved the "quick passenger flow" versus "fare evasion" balance properly, hence single door buses being so common. London has regularly tried open access and then reverted back, whether with the bendies or the Borismasters.
I use mine on rail replacement where I don't have to collect the fares so it isn't an issue. Stops where it normally takes a good two minutes to empty a double deck bus, I look in the gangway mirror and the one which still has the three door config is empty in 30 seconds!
The time advantage of open boarding is disputed, I think it has been concluded that the total PVR saving in London from its use has been a round figure of 0. Only certain routes might benefit, like the 607 which is limited stop and does suffer from extended dwell times vs the 207/427 due to very high turnover of passengers at most of its stops. Open boarding might save the 10 minutes required to remove a bus from the cycle but the operational costs vs a double decker might well make a big dent in the saving.
Last edited: