Cambrian359
Member
- Joined
- 17 Jun 2018
- Messages
- 210
Would assume costs? as surely having all units fitted would make things much more flexible and operationally friendly for planners etc
Is there any reports of 197120 out today? If so any idea where it'll be off to the next few days?197120 is planned to enter service on Monday.
It's at Chester but not allocated so far.Is there any reports of 197120 out today? If so any idea where it'll be off to the next few days?
Shame. Hopefully tomorrow.It's at Chester but not allocated so far.
Thanks as always, I'll be keeping an eye out for any allocations that seem to be empty tomorrow, as RTT won't have it on the system yet. Similar to when the new ones enter service. Cheers!It's at Chester but not allocated so far.
Cost is one consideration, and necessity has to be another.I don't think that has ever been officially answered - was it a cost-saving measure or are ETCS-fitted units somehow inferior if you don't have to have it? If I recall correctly they were originally expected to all be delivered with ETCS/ERTMS but that later changed for some reason (or perhaps there was a misunderstanding of the original announcement and it was only ever 21 ETCS-fitted units on-order).
The Holyhead portion would have to be a non-ETCS unit otherwise the ETCS-fitted ones would still be going through to Holyhead and all 21 units would be occupied with the Cambrian duties, just as there was normally only 3 diagrams visiting south Wales out of the 24 ATW 158s. Also, if I recall correctly the round trip time from Shrewsbury to Birmingham International and back puts the unit from Holyhead on a service to Pwllheli when it goes back west (and vice versa) so to avoid sending ETCS-fitted units to Wrexham/Holyhead the train would have to be three units east of Shrewsbury (4-cars doing Aberystwyth/Pwllheli - Birmingham International plus a non-ETCS unit providing the Wrexham/Holyhead portion).
1V95 has never been a Mk4 service... do you mean 1V96?IV95 was a 150 today, and the trolley came off at Chester. Uncomfortable, noisy and draughty, but at least not a cancellation. To think that a year ago I was on the same train sitting in first!
Maybe, it was a late morning / midday Mk 4 Bangor to Cardiff i used several times1V95 has never been a Mk4 service... do you mean 1V96?
That'll be 1V96 then.Maybe, it was a late morning / midday Mk 4 Bangor to Cardiff i used several times
Isn't ERTMS just a software load on these units?Cost is one consideration, and necessity has to be another.
Every single piece of electronic kit installed in a drivers cab introduces risk of failure. so don't have it unless you need it. I can recall more than one instance of something as simple as a DRA button coming off in the drivers hand. Result unusable cab, possible cancellation, reversal if possible, or finding another unit to bury the defective cab. Much easier not to have the kit in the cab in the first place if it is not needed - or up until the time ETCS is rolled out to the routes the unit work in normal service
Hardware too. Some of the wiring has been done, but I think that's about it. Most noticeably, they still have analogue speedometers. I suspect there's other bits of equipment but fitted either. It's a quicker fix than on the 158s, but slightly more involved than just adding software.Isn't ERTMS just a software load on these units?
022-032 haven't been accepted either. The gap between 021 and 042 are the ERTMS fitted units for the Cambrian. Mostly in storage at Telford I believe.Something odd has happened with the delivery of the Class 197s - according to my notes 197001-32 and 197042-051 are delivered, but what has happened to 033-041 and why have 042-051 apparently overtaken them ? Might it be that 042-051 were completeted somewhere other than Llanwern - ie: imported complete ??
Thanks.That'll be 1V96 then.
Showing as under maintenance at Chester so would appear something not quite right with it as shoulnt be due anything that quickly. Hopefully its debut isn't too far off.Doesn't look like 197120's made it out thus far
Its not been In public service yet. Just milage accumulation and testing.I thought '120 was out about a week ago Crewe / Cardiff or was that strictly on test and not in revenue service?
CheersIts not been In public service yet. Just milage accumulation and testing.
Yes that won't go so will have to swap the 3 car out. It could go to Shrewsbury as a 5 but not further.1W64 1504 Milford Haven to Manchester Piccadilly is showing as 5 carriages from Cardiff, so I assume this will change.
Now showing as 197115 only from Cardiff.Yes that won't go so will have to swap the 3 car out. It could go to Shrewsbury as a 5 but not further.
Likely to change again as that one is booked to split at Manchester to form 2 separate trains back. There are workarounds with set swaps at Crewe but it'll be 2x2 car 197 wherever possibleNow showing as 197115 only from Cardiff.
As well as cost I also heard that it was to avoid the boot up time of the software on the DMI on turnaround. Takes a good 4 or 5 minutes to get fully setup on ERTMS, little quicker if your in unfitted mode, but still a lot longer than a non-ertms unit.Was there any reason why they didn’t just fit ERTMS equipment to all of the 197’s? Sorry if I’m missing something obvious here
That seems a long gap between the testing/proving runs and entry into service.On the subject of ERTMS units, I have heard today that there is ERTMS testing booked on the Cambrian for 9th of March with proving runs in April/May. Entry into service on the Cambrian is dated for December 2025.
I do hope that’s an accidental typo for 2024.On the subject of ERTMS units, I have heard today that there is ERTMS testing booked on the Cambrian for 9th of March with proving runs in April/May. Entry into service on the Cambrian is dated for December 2025.
That seems a long gap between the testing/proving runs and entry into service.
Yes it does and no it’s not unfortunately. I double checked they didn’t meant 2024 and was assured that 2025 was the latest given plan, as of yesterday.I do hope that’s an accidental typo for 2024
Ive been told the same. As I understand it its due to the plan being effectively an overnight change, 158s finish one day and the 197s start the next (it'll be slightly more complex than that!) So everything, training, maintenance etc will have to be 100% ready for the service introduction.Yes it does and no it’s not unfortunately. I double checked they didn’t meant 2024 and was assured that 2025 was the latest given plan, as of yesterday