Bletchleyite
Veteran Member
Do you mean that Wembley Stadium station is not fit for the purpose?
I'd say it's not, to be honest. I'd probably say to be honest that Chiltern's service is not fit for the purpose of moving large numbers of people to/from Wembley. Clearly it likes the money from doing so so it makes it work most of the time with queueing systems, but really it'd be better if everyone dispersed a lot better by taking the Met to London then arriving at Marylebone in a more dribs-and-drabs manner.
Wasn't it built to specifically cater for event demands?
It was built to cater for football matches at the old, much smaller stadium. In reality this would only mean high demand when Wycombe Wanderers were playing, as for other football matches most people wouldn't be coming from the Chiltern line direction and would arrive via the Met from London having got there from wherever they were coming from, or on dedicated supporter coaches.
It hasn't really been expanded substantially since the old stadium was replaced with the much larger new one and the surrounding developments. It has been done up a bit but the changes aren't huge. But the main issue is that the Chiltern line is a secondary route which doesn't have anywhere near the capacity (frequency or train length) of other London termini. It also doesn't have any units with SDO and is driver-only operated so other workarounds aren't possible, so if a train is too long for a station it simply cannot call.
Does TfL have well-practiced arrangements for shifting crowds in the country direction?
It doesn't need to. Aside from people going to Amersham etc, it shifts them into London and they disperse to their relevant London termini and arrive there in more of dribs and drabs because they stop for a drink or a kebab or whatever.
I mean that 0 from Wembley can travel towards the country direction. Of course the Chiltern trains will be full of London - Birmingham passengers, but how about Wembley - Birmingham (or anywhere on the Chiltern lines) passengers? Under normal circumstances, some can travel Wembley to Oxford, but on that day, 0 will be able to travel from Wembley to Oxford.
There is also an alternative route from London to Birmingham, which is via Paddington and Reading, taking similar time as Chiltern's direct trains. Do you think this route will also be overcrowded that it can't take more displaced Euston - Birmingham passengers? Instead, Chiltern is offering no viable alternative route from Wembley Stadium to the country here.
They are. You take the Met into London (which unlike Chiltern operates long, standee trains at a high frequency so can cope with the loadings) then disperse to relevant London termini (not Euston in this case, but as you say Marylebone or Paddington) or coaches or whatever.