• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 379 updates (all are OFF LEASE)

Status
Not open for further replies.

CBlue

Member
Joined
30 Mar 2020
Messages
803
Location
East Angular
or West Anglia Main Line, yes.

anyone who says WAML, (pronounced “Whammel’) gets a hard stare from me. Same with “Gemmel”. Horrible.
So it does have some actual convention beyond a Wikipedia entry?

It certainly seems to have ended up in use across a few areas as a quick search on Google (other search engines are available) shows.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
15,818
Location
Devon
We’d probably better get back on topic here before it gets too late… ;)
 

43102EMR

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2021
Messages
1,255
Location
UK
I’ll start - how many exactly are expected to go into store over the next month or so?
 

03_179

Established Member
Joined
13 Aug 2008
Messages
3,407
Location
At my desk
Allocations
379001 - At Ilford
379002 - At Parkston (S)
379003 - At Parkston (S)
379004 - At Parkston (S)
379005 - At Ilford
379006 - At Ilford
379007 - At Orient Way CS
379008 - At Cambridge Sidings
379009 - At Parkston (S)
379010 - At Ilford
379011 - At Parkston (S)
379012 - At Cambridge Sidings
379013 - At Orient Way CS
379014 - At Ilford
379015 - At Parkston (S)
379016 - At Parkston (S)
379017 - At Ilford
379018 - At Parkston (S)
379019 - At Parkston (S)
379020 - At Parkston (S)
379021 - At Ilford
379022 - At Ilford
379023 - At Ilford
379024 - At Orient Way CS
379025 - At Orient Way CS
379026 - At Ilford
379027 - Not allocated
379028 - At Parkston (S)
379029 - At Cambridge Sidings
379030 - At Cambridge Sidings
 

43102EMR

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2021
Messages
1,255
Location
UK
Allocations
379001 - At Ilford
379002 - At Parkston (S)
379003 - At Parkston (S)
379004 - At Parkston (S)
379005 - At Ilford
379006 - At Ilford
379007 - At Orient Way CS
379008 - At Cambridge Sidings
379009 - At Parkston (S)
379010 - At Ilford
379011 - At Parkston (S)
379012 - At Cambridge Sidings
379013 - At Orient Way CS
379014 - At Ilford
379015 - At Parkston (S)
379016 - At Parkston (S)
379017 - At Ilford
379018 - At Parkston (S)
379019 - At Parkston (S)
379020 - At Parkston (S)
379021 - At Ilford
379022 - At Ilford
379023 - At Ilford
379024 - At Orient Way CS
379025 - At Orient Way CS
379026 - At Ilford
379027 - Not allocated
379028 - At Parkston (S)
379029 - At Cambridge Sidings
379030 - At Cambridge Sidings
So none are in service whatsoever today? Or will any be out later?
 

03_179

Established Member
Joined
13 Aug 2008
Messages
3,407
Location
At my desk
None are out and looks like they won't be.

Nearly all are mark N/Serviceable


Of course we all know things change at a moments notice on the railways
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
10,509
Location
Farnham
Can we assume they’re good as withdrawn now? Of course, there were none out on Monday and while two slipped out one Tuesday, there have been none out Wednesday or Thursday either. I remember someone on here saying the expensive lease renews at the start of February.
 

03_179

Established Member
Joined
13 Aug 2008
Messages
3,407
Location
At my desk
None out today either.

They are stored on various locations (listed on my blog as always)

They were suposed to be moving to GN but that is a bit unlikely now unless certain things change.
 

43102EMR

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2021
Messages
1,255
Location
UK
Can we assume they’re good as withdrawn now? Of course, there were none out on Monday and while two slipped out one Tuesday, there have been none out Wednesday or Thursday either. I remember someone on here saying the expensive lease renews at the start of February.
The timetable increases on Monday - I wouldn’t assume this as of yet…
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
4,579
The timetable increases on Monday - I wouldn’t assume this as of yet…
I agree, I've tried to apply some numbers to the situation.

December 2021 the situation on West Anglia was:
Class 317 six pairs
Class 379 13 pairs and one single
Class 720 4 singles
Total 24 trains in service.

I think there are 12 x class 720 this week so assuming they can turn out 10 pairs of class 317 (leaving 3 units spare) that's only 22 trains. So to avoid using class 379s they'll need two extra class 720 turns and also there needs to be something spare to cover failures.
 

Railperf

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2017
Messages
2,943
I agree, I've tried to apply some numbers to the situation.

December 2021 the situation on West Anglia was:
Class 317 six pairs
Class 379 13 pairs and one single
Class 720 4 singles
Total 24 trains in service.

I think there are 12 x class 720 this week so assuming they can turn out 10 pairs of class 317 (leaving 3 units spare) that's only 22 trains. So to avoid using class 379s they'll need two extra class 720 turns and also there needs to be something spare to cover failures.
There were only 2 x Class 317 pairs out yesterday. So the remainder of the fleet will need warming up - assuming they are all serviceable. Assuming that GA accept a pair of 720s each week..then it is possible to reduce the need for 317s or 379s to be used.
In the worst case, some GEML diagrams could revert to 321 operation to free up more 720s for WA.
 

Alfie1014

Member
Joined
27 Jun 2012
Messages
1,128
Location
Essex
There were only 2 x Class 317 pairs out yesterday. So the remainder of the fleet will need warming up - assuming they are all serviceable. Assuming that GA accept a pair of 720s each week..then it is possible to reduce the need for 317s or 379s to be used.
In the worst case, some GEML diagrams could revert to 321 operation to free up more 720s for WA.
Not sure where those 321s might come from, the GE side frequencies increase too, there are 4 extra peak services on the outer suburban routes from Monday morning plus some of the branches (Braintree and Colch Town) become through services all day increasing unit mileage. Matters not helped by the inability to couple 720s in Liverpool Street I believe.
 

Class 466

Established Member
Joined
5 Mar 2010
Messages
1,433
None out today either.

They are stored on various locations (listed on my blog as always)

They were suposed to be moving to GN but that is a bit unlikely now unless certain things change.
What’s changed on the GN front?
 

Railperf

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2017
Messages
2,943
Not sure where those 321s might come from, the GE side frequencies increase too,
Are all the available 321s in use? Could off-peak 720 diagrams be reduced to 5-car to spread the fleet? Do we know how many WA and GEML diagrams will exist next week and how many 720s are available to fill them?
I'm assuming all drivers sign them now.
 

CDM

Member
Joined
18 Apr 2012
Messages
72
Which is a major flaw of the thinking 5 years ago

Unless you scrap new, but displaced stock or there's an exact requirement for them (e.g. the EMR 360s), you end up creating non standard issues elsewhere (e.g. the 707s now at Southeastern, operating alongside Networkers and 376s on the same routes)
Indeed. When the Class 360's were bought to replace the Class 312's, they weren't what FGE actually wanted - FGE wanted more Class 321's (and Eversholt were keen to provide) but Silverlink wouldn't release them and the nomadic 322's weren't enough on their own, so they had no choice but to buy new.

Eversholt eventually (years later) got their wish to consolidate all the 321/322 fleet in one place in East Anglia but sadly, politics and the ridiculous way franchise bidding meant rolling stock cost books get cooked, means that has now resulted in the entire fleet having no home...

So it does have some actual convention beyond a Wikipedia entry?

It certainly seems to have ended up in use across a few areas as a quick search on Google (other search engines are available) shows.
WAML is the commonly used industry abbreviation for the West Anglia Mainline, yes.
Similarly, GEML is the commonly used indusrty abbreviation for the Great Eastern Mainline.

"Whammel" as a way of saying "WAML" is in common use in the industry, yes

(So none of the above are just a Wikipedia thing, no...)

"Gemmel" is not commonly used for GEML in the industry (and I hope it doesn't become so!) - it's normally just called "the GE".
 
Last edited:

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
4,579
There were only 2 x Class 317 pairs out yesterday. So the remainder of the fleet will need warming up - assuming they are all serviceable. Assuming that GA accept a pair of 720s each week..then it is possible to reduce the need for 317s or 379s to be used.
In the worst case, some GEML diagrams could revert to 321 operation to free up more 720s for WA.
To be fair there were four pairs of 317s yesterday. One pair appears to have stood in for a 720 to Cambridge all day which proves my point about spares. The 317s are happy to sit around for weeks and then go straight back to service, e.g. 317515 sat in Cambridge, near platform 6, for over four weeks then suddenly appeared back in service on the Hertford line.

Fair point about the 321s, I think only around half are being used this week.

Regarding 379s, there are still three single sets dotted around Cambridge. They are still moving around, e.g. on Wednesday 379006 ran from Cambridge to Ilford with 379030 going the other way.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
16,084
Location
East Anglia
Are all the available 321s in use? Could off-peak 720 diagrams be reduced to 5-car to spread the fleet? Do we know how many WA and GEML diagrams will exist next week and how many 720s are available to fill them?
I'm assuming all drivers sign them now.
All WA & GE drivers should sign them now.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
10,509
Location
Farnham
I’ll be honest, the constant murmurings about transfer to Great Northern continues to baffle me. It started off as speculation and “what should happen” some years ago, and then somewhere along the line it became “what will happen”, despite there being absolutely no confirmation… goodness, even Richard Clinnick has said nothing about it, and we all know the ex RAIL journalist likes to tweet interesting updates on rolling stock news.

I’m just dying for official confirmation that will stop me thinking everyone’s still speculating, even those who are rail staff.
 

physics34

Established Member
Joined
1 Dec 2013
Messages
3,707
I’ll be honest, the constant murmurings about transfer to Great Northern continues to baffle me. It started off as speculation and “what should happen” some years ago, and then somewhere along the line it became “what will happen”, despite there being absolutely no confirmation… goodness, even Richard Clinnick has said nothing about it, and we all know the ex RAIL journalist likes to tweet interesting updates on rolling stock news.

I’m just dying for official confirmation that will stop me thinking everyone’s still speculating, even those who are rail staff.
Yep, i work for GTR and have seen nothing official although various people in higher places have said that they believed said cascades were happening. I may be wrong but i think the 387/1s are leased to southern and then sub leased to GN, on paper anyway?
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,800
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
Yep, i work for GTR and have seen nothing official although various people in higher places have said that they believed said cascades were happening. I may be wrong but i think the 387/1s are leased to southern and then sub leased to GN, on paper anyway?

I’ve also heard from reliable sources that this has “cooled down”. 379 high leasing charges struck again? May well be some politics going on, though.

Perhaps GTR wish they’d just kept the 365s after all?!
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,355
Yep, i work for GTR and have seen nothing official although various people in higher places have said that they believed said cascades were happening. I may be wrong but i think the 387/1s are leased to southern and then sub leased to GN, on paper anyway?
There's no such thing as leased to Southern, as Southern is not a separate company. It's a trading name of Govia Thameslink Railway Ltd., so all "Southern", "Gatwick Express", "Thameslink" and "Great Northern" trains are leased to GTR. As an employee, I'd have thought you'd be aware of this based on what your payslip says?
 

43102EMR

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2021
Messages
1,255
Location
UK
I spoke to a GA driver tonight, and I was told two things re the 379s’ future:

1) All 379s to be withdrawn by the end of Feb
2) 379s will transfer to GN at some point

Some will re-enter service as part of the TTC next week, but aim is to phase them out completely by the end of the month - how reliable this is, I’m not sure, as this isn’t coming “from the top” so to speak…
 

Peregrine 4903

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2019
Messages
1,457
Location
London
I’ll be honest, the constant murmurings about transfer to Great Northern continues to baffle me. It started off as speculation and “what should happen” some years ago, and then somewhere along the line it became “what will happen”, despite there being absolutely no confirmation… goodness, even Richard Clinnick has said nothing about it, and we all know the ex RAIL journalist likes to tweet interesting updates on rolling stock news.

I’m just dying for official confirmation that will stop me thinking everyone’s still speculating, even those who are rail staff.
But this isn't a rumour made up by railuk forums. There are some genuine clues out in the public domain that a transfer was at least planned to happen. And a rail journalist not posting anything about it means nothing.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,355
I spoke to a GA driver tonight, and I was told two things re the 379s’ future:

1) All 379s to be withdrawn by the end of Feb
2) 379s will transfer to GN at some point

Some will re-enter service as part of the TTC next week, but aim is to phase them out completely by the end of the month - how reliable this is, I’m not sure, as this isn’t coming “from the top” so to speak…
I do enjoy it when someone quotes some driver/guard/platform bert about fleet moves to another TOC when they have zero involvement in such decision making - particularly about the transfer to GTR.
 

DanNCL

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2017
Messages
4,323
Location
County Durham
I may be wrong but i think the 387/1s are leased to southern and then sub leased to GN, on paper anyway?
That was the case initially when GTR only consisted of Thameslink and Great Northern, with Southern at the time being a standalone franchise. Since the incorporation of the Southern and Gatwick Express franchise into GTR in 2015, everything operating under the Thameslink, Great Northern, Southern and Gatwick Express brands is all generically leased to GTR.

But this isn't a rumour made up by railuk forums. There are some genuine clues out in the public domain that a transfer was at least planned to happen. And a rail journalist not posting anything about it means nothing.
Indeed. It’s always possible for a journalist either not to know, or to know but been instructed not to mention it until a certain time.
 

physics34

Established Member
Joined
1 Dec 2013
Messages
3,707
There's no such thing as leased to Southern, as Southern is not a separate company. It's a trading name of Govia Thameslink Railway Ltd., so all "Southern", "Gatwick Express", "Thameslink" and "Great Northern" trains are leased to GTR. As an employee, I'd have thought you'd be aware of this based on what your payslip says?
Lol feisty.
I thought for official reasons they maybe still down as 'southern' rather than everything being merged
 

Peregrine 4903

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2019
Messages
1,457
Location
London
I do enjoy it when someone quotes some driver/guard/platform bert about fleet moves to another TOC when they have zero involvement in such decision making - particularly about the transfer to GTR.
This is an unessecarily aggressive response to a simple mistake. Its an easy mistake that anyone can make.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top