Peter Sarf
Established Member
Ah but things are far more sophisticated (= amazingly complicated) these days !.In 1958 BR would swap over an entire depot from steam one day DMU the next oh and generally on improved timings as well
Ah but things are far more sophisticated (= amazingly complicated) these days !.In 1958 BR would swap over an entire depot from steam one day DMU the next oh and generally on improved timings as well
Not the same depot, though. It would take more time than is available overnight to clear all the old trains out and drive the new ones in. But if, as was often the case, a new depot had been built for the DMUs, yes, it could be done.In 1958 BR would swap over an entire depot from steam one day DMU the next oh and generally on improved timings as well
I can't find much detail on this, other than mitrac as a whole has been handeled by Vasteras for a while.indeed Mitrac electronics from Sweden - but don't (this is a question not a statement) Mitrac traction motors hail from the ADTranz German constituents even if supported from Sweden now ? 1990s mergers and takeovers were all a little incestuous as well as complexicated
I appreciate im being a tad facetious but we need some drive and energy back in this industry to deliver things a lot quicker as that is how you keep industry costs down.Not the same depot, though. It would take more time than is available overnight to clear all the old trains out and drive the new ones in. But if, as was often the case, a new depot had been built for the DMUs, yes, it could be done.
And had the people distributing these rumours also been made aware of SWR’s plans to simply not use them at all?I've heard rumours the 458/4's will be used on Waterloo-Alton/Basingstoke services, instead of the Portsmouth route, because of less or quicker driver training and testing the 100mph re-gearing.
The MD said the other day they are not using them soAnd had the people distributing these rumours also been made aware of SWR’s plans to simply not use them at all?
It's the Plastic Pigs all over again...And had the people distributing these rumours also been made aware of SWR’s plans to simply not use them at all?
So although the SWR Arterio webpage needs updating, the route map is still correct and they won't run to Alton.I can't see any (save for a front shot or two) that weren't there in 2022; certainly the interior shots are CGI. The fact that a lot of it is now out of fat (following entry into service) and the myriad grammatical errors leaves a lot to be desired...
So SWR are now considering using the refurbished 458s (12 car?) on the Alton and Basingstoke lines as a stopgap (rather than the PDL) until more Arterios rollout for the more inner London routes and more 450s can be released?“Railfuture Wessex branch members have noticed some Class 450 trains in the Wessex branch area are getting overcrowded as they are running with fewer carriages, presumably because some of the carriages are diverted to South Western Railway metro services which were supposed to be operated by now with the new Arterios.![]()
Hope that new trains will improve Alton to London Waterloo service
Campaigners for better rail services are expecting improvements on the Alton to London Waterloo line following South Western Railway’s announcement that new trains are on the way.www.altonherald.com
“South Western Railway have said they plan to start bringing in the new trains but they acknowledge they will have to run some short-formed trains until the Arterios come into service later this year.
Doesn't mean they have to use them in great quantities though.Also SWR have to lease the 458s till 2027.
That make two of us then - as I been off looking too.I can't find much detail on this, other than mitrac as a whole has been handeled by Vasteras for a while.
Does not mean (i) contract can't be cancelled or (ii) they can't be sub leased.Also SWR have to lease the 458s till 2027.
004, 006, 009, 011, 012, 013, 014, 015, 016, 017, 018, 019, 022, 023, 024, 025, 026, 027, 028, 029, 030, 031, 032, 033, 034, 035, 036, 037, 038, 039, 040, 041, 042, 043, 044, 045, 046, 047, 048, 049, 050, 051, 052, 054, 056, 508, 509, 510, 512, 515, 516
There is no plan for basing guards/drivers to sign 701s, so 450s will be needed on both 2Sxx and 2Cxx at some point. Otherwise you lose a fair chunk of diversionary route knowledge via Chertsey and there certainly isn't enough top link Waterloo drivers to run all the diesel services via Chertsey during engineering weekendsNo. 450s will be used exclusively on London Waterloo to Portsmouth via Basingstoke and Guildford, London Waterloo to Alton and Basingstoke, Ascot to Aldershot (excluding through services), Farnham to Guildford, Winchester to Bournemouth stopping service, Brockenhurst to Lymington and Southampton to Portsmouth. Now that I’ve written that out and bearing in mind there are 127, it makes sense that SWR don’t think they’ll need the 458/4s as well.
No chance of a pre covid timetable, SWR currently don't have enough guards to run the current service since the drop to 37 hour week.Not running at weekends currently.
Well, in testing, especially during the early days, they've run on every section of electrified line.
We also have to remember that as per the 720s, there are likely to be surplus units unless SWR decide to restore services to pre-Covid levels, which seems a very remote possibility.
They have to use them for something, they can't just let them rot in a siding.And had the people distributing these rumours also been made aware of SWR’s plans to simply not use them at all?
The route map originally showing on the SWR website as shown in the following news article dated 22 January 2021 showed the Arterios running to Alton.So although the SWR Arterio webpage needs updating, the route map is still correct and they won't run to Alton.
![]()
New £1bn fleet of South Western Railway trains delayed
Rail minister Chris Heaton-Harris says the 90 trains are not expected in service until early summer.www.bbc.co.uk
Is their not enough woking and waterloo crew who sign the curve and use this stock on other routes to do the diversions? This would keep the desiros of the metro routes!There is no plan for basing guards/drivers to sign 701s, so 450s will be needed on both 2Sxx and 2Cxx at some point. Otherwise you lose a fair chunk of diversionary route knowledge via Chertsey and there certainly isn't enough top link Waterloo drivers to run all the diesel services via Chertsey during engineering weekends
Woking don't sign dieselsIs their not enough woking and waterloo crew who sign the curve and use this stock on other routes to do the diversions? This would keep the desiros of the metro routes!
Ref: Post 7663, Thanks Snow1964 for this interesting post, but what exactly does this data reflect ? It appears to be the agreement date that each unit is financed by Deutshe Bank to Rock Rail South Western, but does it also reflect that the unit is now Rock Rail property from the date quoted and is paid for to the manufacturer ?
Nevertheless, it is all very interesting and one wonders if similar documents are freely avaliable for other fleets such as 720s ?
Which is not a particularly useful map to conclude much else as the area closer to London includes EVERY SWR route, and away from London it cuts off after Farnborough on SWML and after Milford on the Pompey Direct, and no services routinely end at either Milford or Farnborough, so inconclusive as to where the country destinations might be.The route map originally showing on the SWR website as shown in the following news article dated 22 January 2021 showed the Arterios running to Alton.
An Excellent vide. The trains look very good inside and out.Here is the full video of the inaugural journey from London Waterloo to Windsor & Eton Riverside and back! It is 4K 60 fps, and is also over two hours long!
. (Still processing to 4K 60 fps)
No, because it wasn't intended - Staines to Windsor is shut tomorrow for engineering work. As stated previously on this thread, it's Tuesday to Friday this week. Subject to the usual, of course.What’s the plan tomorrow? Are two Waterloo to Windsor ER round trip services running as intended?
No.. it's been mentioned multiple times that due to the line from staines to windsor being closed for engineering work tomorrow, there are no services.What’s the plan tomorrow? Are two Waterloo to Windsor ER round trip services running as intended?
It is fair a bit more complicated than that, but in brief before I write a full history:That make two of us then - as I been off looking too.
The SE contributor company based in Vasteras was ASEA; just at the back of my mind there is an AEG traction motor legacy in there somewhere.
AEG (part of Daimler Benz since 1985) got into the ABB group - ABB was a merger of ASEA and BBC (Brown Boveri) that also got swallowed by Daimler Benz.
I think the ABB traction (as opposed to train manufacture / assembly) bit did not go to Bombardier, as ABB still exist today - and are the class 88 and 93 motor makers (and other kit) - AEG Schienenfahrzeuge became ABB Daimler Benz Transportation (Adtranz) then to Bombardier a few years later - and I think that is the motors bit. Maybe.
I might be wrong. and anyway all it needs is a transfer of IP or manufacture from one site / country to another and it all gets clouded over.
Whatever, Vasteras is sure the home of Mitrac, and always has been, it is just where did all the different bits that make up the current Mitrac product range come from.
These incestuous company histories are nothing new or unique - the same thing occured with what led to GEC as it was in 1970s with all they acquired on the way, and then all that has happened since they broke up.
That was part of ABDO so sadly not coming anytime soonI shouldn’t think so, unless a new capability of running on roads between SNS and WNR has magically been created
thanks for that lotIt is fair a bit more complicated than that, but in brief before I write a full history:
By mid 1986 it was clear that most of the three phase drive vector control logic IP was going to reside with just BBC and Siemens and similarly that both would be significant players in the emerging IGBT technology that would succeed GTO.
ASEA and BBC announced the merger in 1987 which completed in early Jan 1988. ABB has always been independent (The Wallenberg family trust sharing holding and board seat from the ASEA era help ensure this) but it has done joint ventures.
Late 1980s ABB Zurich start developing a sophisticated network based locomotive control system call MICAS-S (Modular Integrated Control and Advisory System), this goes on from the basis for the later MITRAC control system elements.
In 1989/1990 ABB bought long term collaborators Henschel from Thyssen (Henschel were also long term Daimler Benz partners for HGVsand in even longer terms on the Tiger 2). The Henschel brought with them a bogie plant in Siegen.
In 1991 AEG (owned by Daimler-Benz) bought back some the former East German assets of AEG (e.g LEW Hennigsdorf) that had been nationalised without compensation by East Germany in 1947/48.
From 1991 ABB develop the Lok2000 locomotive platform that ends up forming the basis for numerous locomotives across Europe e.g. Cl 92 and Eurotunnel shuttle locos in the UK (both use MICAS-S).
In 1992 ABB bought parts of BREL and various other BR assets.
BBC and AEG (West Germany) started working together on projects in the late 1970s e.g. DB class 120 and then again intensively in the 1990s, this became formalised as the ADtranz joint venture in 1995. ABB Daimler Benz Transportation with the s transposed to z for branding reasons (A to Z). (Siemens and Krauss-Maffei had been cooperating for very long time so AEG didn't have any real options there)
Daimler Benz also owned MTU hence MTU engine choice for virtually all rolling stock apart from a locomotive last mile range extender engine from Deutz (the later which Stadler later copied for the Flirts).
ABB sold its 50% stake in ADtranz to Daimler Benz in 1999. ABB and ADtranz (and ADtranz successors Bombardier and Alstom) continued to coexist at many joint locations that were ABB locations pre JV: Zurich, Vasteras, Mannheim, Vienna (all still actively involved for both companies) and part of the Vienna operation were later sold off by Bombardier and became TSA. (The AEG East German motor factory at Hennisgdorf near Berlin was retained in preference to the Vienna motor factory)
In 2000 Daimler Benz agreed to sell Adtranz to Bombardier. Bombardier had already been buying up European rail manufacturers (e.g. B&N in Belgium - Voyagers and Meridian) and IP (BR). The sale completed in 2001.
In circa 2003 Bombardier did some (re-)branding coming up with MITRAC (Modular Integrated Traction System) to describe the control and electrical system packages.
The Mitrac product range is split into three with 3 technical centres leading each area:
There are three traction centres of excellence for different end usage product areas (not necessarily production locations which tend to focus by type of part e.g. TCMS electronics (but not software) in Mannheim, motors in Hennigsdorf )
Trams - 1xxx Mitrac products Mannheim
EMUs - 2xxx Mitrac products Vasteras e.g. Electrostar and Aventra
Loco and high power high speed - 3xxx Mitrac products: Zurich e.g. Traxx
Most of the volume is 2xxx series products hence Vasteras being mostly seen as the MITRAC lead (especially in the UK).
ABB retain rail design and manufacturing centres in Vasteras and just outside Zurich. The now former ABB transformers business (ABB-Secheron that supplies most rail transformers in Europe) and ABB Integrated Circuits (used in the Power electronics) were sold to Hitachi in 2021 but are still Headquartered and manufactured in Switzerland. Stadler electricals are effectively always ABB with either ABB or TSA traction motors.
Amazing post!It is fair a bit more complicated than that, but in brief before I write a full history:
By mid 1986 it was clear that most of the three phase drive vector control logic IP was going to reside with just BBC and Siemens and similarly that both would be significant players in the emerging IGBT technology that would succeed GTO.
ASEA and BBC announced the merger in 1987 which completed in early Jan 1988. ABB has always been independent (The Wallenberg family trust sharing holding and board seat from the ASEA era help ensure this) but it has done joint ventures.
Late 1980s ABB Zurich start developing a sophisticated network based locomotive control system call MICAS-S (Modular Integrated Control and Advisory System), this goes on from the basis for the later MITRAC control system elements.
In 1989/1990 ABB bought long term collaborators Henschel from Thyssen (Henschel were also long term Daimler Benz partners for HGVsand in even longer terms on the Tiger 2). The Henschel brought with them a bogie plant in Siegen.
In 1991 AEG (owned by Daimler-Benz) bought back some the former East German assets of AEG (e.g LEW Hennigsdorf) that had been nationalised without compensation by East Germany in 1947/48.
From 1991 ABB develop the Lok2000 locomotive platform that ends up forming the basis for numerous locomotives across Europe e.g. Cl 92 and Eurotunnel shuttle locos in the UK (both use MICAS-S).
In 1992 ABB bought parts of BREL and various other BR assets.
BBC and AEG (West Germany) started working together on projects in the late 1970s e.g. DB class 120 and then again intensively in the 1990s, this became formalised as the ADtranz joint venture in 1995. ABB Daimler Benz Transportation with the s transposed to z for branding reasons (A to Z). (Siemens and Krauss-Maffei had been cooperating for very long time so AEG didn't have any real options there)
Daimler Benz also owned MTU hence MTU engine choice for virtually all rolling stock apart from a locomotive last mile range extender engine from Deutz (the later which Stadler later copied for the Flirts).
ABB sold its 50% stake in ADtranz to Daimler Benz in 1999. ABB and ADtranz (and ADtranz successors Bombardier and Alstom) continued to coexist at many joint locations that were ABB locations pre JV: Zurich, Vasteras, Mannheim, Vienna (all still actively involved for both companies) and part of the Vienna operation were later sold off by Bombardier and became TSA. (The AEG East German motor factory at Hennisgdorf near Berlin was retained in preference to the Vienna motor factory)
In 2000 Daimler Benz agreed to sell Adtranz to Bombardier. Bombardier had already been buying up European rail manufacturers (e.g. B&N in Belgium - Voyagers and Meridian) and IP (BR). The sale completed in 2001.
In circa 2003 Bombardier did some (re-)branding coming up with MITRAC (Modular Integrated Traction System) to describe the control and electrical system packages.
The Mitrac product range is split into three with 3 technical centres leading each area:
There are three traction centres of excellence for different end usage product areas (not necessarily production locations which tend to focus by type of part e.g. TCMS electronics (but not software) in Mannheim, motors in Hennigsdorf )
Trams - 1xxx Mitrac products Mannheim
EMUs - 2xxx Mitrac products Vasteras e.g. Electrostar and Aventra
Loco and high power high speed - 3xxx Mitrac products: Zurich e.g. Traxx
Most of the volume is 2xxx series products hence Vasteras being mostly seen as the MITRAC lead (especially in the UK).
ABB retain rail design and manufacturing centres in Vasteras and just outside Zurich. The now former ABB transformers business (ABB-Secheron that supplies most rail transformers in Europe) and ABB Integrated Circuits (used in the Power electronics) were sold to Hitachi in 2021 but are still Headquartered and manufactured in Switzerland. Stadler electricals are effectively always ABB with either ABB or TSA traction motors.