norbitonflyer
Established Member
post 7789 updated - thanks701043 (the named set) out yesterday (when I took a ride to Staines and back) and also today.
post 7789 updated - thanks701043 (the named set) out yesterday (when I took a ride to Staines and back) and also today.
Don’t be so stand-offish; I happened to defend staff several times who supplied information and then were criticised, so your sarky opening line is not appreciated. All I was saying is that there’s no shame in openly admitting one has no idea what’s happening next with the 701s, because it’s honestly a confusing situation. I was being nice for once, damn!Staff could just stop posting on the site in general if that’s what you’d prefer?
As I’ve said before, people contribute information on RailUK Forums with best intentions, but unfortunately the railway runs on tea and rumours. This means someone may post on here fully believing something that turns out to not be true.
You also get information lag and “Chinese whispers” (I’m not sure if there’s a more politically correct term for that phrase) so factual information is disseminated to a handful of people at Waterloo, and by the time that information makes it to (for example) a driver or guard at Weymouth the information is either out of date or distorted.
The forum has a policy on quoting your sources which is fair enough, however I believe it’s also fair enough that members are not expected name drop where that information has come from. Members who are staff in my opinion should however use their initiative to work out how timely the information is. For example Monty stating their head LDC rep at their guards depot had told them something is probably reasonably accurate, however depot messroom chat (and it happens in a lot of industries) is usually more fiction than fact.
Is your information relating to 10:25 Dep Waterloo today?post 7789 updated - thanks
That's the only 701 diagram today.Is your information relating to 10:25 Dep Waterloo today?
Don’t be so stand-offish; I happened to defend staff several times who supplied information and then were criticised, so your sarky opening line is not appreciated. All I was saying is that there’s no shame in openly admitting one has no idea what’s happening next with the 701s, because it’s honestly a confusing situation. I was being nice for once, damn!![]()
Yes - in response to the previous post saying unit 043 ran today - RTT having, unusually, kept us in the dark.Is your information relating to 10:25 Dep Waterloo today?
Hoping to travel on 10:25 tomorrow, fingers crossed.Yes - in response to the previous post saying unit 043 ran today - RTT having, unusually, kept us in the dark.
5Z73/74Just seen a rather odd set of paths on RTT for Waterloo. Wondering if these are 701 related?
Realtime Trains | 5Z73 1042 Strawberry Hill C.S.D. to London Waterloo | 27/01/2024
Real-time train running information for 5Z73 1042 departure from Strawberry Hill C.S.D. to London Waterloo on 27/01/2024. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
Realtime Trains | 1Z90 1024 Woking to London Waterloo | 27/01/2024
Real-time train running information for 1Z90 1024 departure from Woking to London Waterloo on 27/01/2024. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
Realtime Trains | 5Z74 1210 London Waterloo to Strawberry Hill C.S.D. | 27/01/2024
Real-time train running information for 5Z74 1210 departure from London Waterloo to Strawberry Hill C.S.D. on 27/01/2024. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
5Z73/74
73 3417 (4 VEP) 73
I believe not. Connected with Gordon Pettitt's 90th birthday.Just seen a rather odd set of paths on RTT for Waterloo. Wondering if these are 701 related?
Realtime Trains | 5Z73 1042 Strawberry Hill C.S.D. to London Waterloo | 27/01/2024
Real-time train running information for 5Z73 1042 departure from Strawberry Hill C.S.D. to London Waterloo on 27/01/2024. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
Realtime Trains | 1Z90 1024 Woking to London Waterloo | 27/01/2024
Real-time train running information for 1Z90 1024 departure from Woking to London Waterloo on 27/01/2024. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
Realtime Trains | 5Z74 1210 London Waterloo to Strawberry Hill C.S.D. | 27/01/2024
Real-time train running information for 5Z74 1210 departure from London Waterloo to Strawberry Hill C.S.D. on 27/01/2024. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
So a repeat of the 2013 ceremony on platform 19?I believe not. Connected with Gordon Pettitt's 90th birthday.
interesting, the chessi's interwork with the woking and guildford via cobhams. hampton courts interwork with the via epsom services (apart from sundays).The latest issue of Modern Railways gives the current planned rollout programme:
1. Windsor
2. Weybridge / Hounslow loop
3. Kingston loop / Shepperton
4. Reading / Ascot - Farnham
5. Hampton Court / Chessington / Dorking
6. Woking / Guildford
Training expected to take 12-18 months.
Or the timetable, and stock diagrams, will change in June.interesting, the chessi's interwork with the woking and guildford via cobhams. hampton courts interwork with the via epsom services (apart from sundays).
So 5+6 would either be done at the same time or are incorrect.
I imagine that's the reason they're second last and last in an 18 month programme.interesting, the chessi's interwork with the woking and guildford via cobhams. hampton courts interwork with the via epsom services (apart from sundays).
So 5+6 would either be done at the same time or are incorrect.
I don't have any 'insider' knowledge of the (701) plans, but I suspect this is a very likely scenario. Prior to the original 10 car (455+455+456 & 707) plan on the main suburban side, a small number of what had been long (in situ) term 455 diagrams were revised at Waterloo (in/out workings) in such a way that the diagram(s) themselves (forget the stock type) would work with the as yet to be (at the time) implemented 10 car plan and associated new track layout outside p1-4. The thinking behind this was to allow the revised diagram pattern/timetable and crew diagrams to bed in and settle down, so that when the 10 cars did start running over the new layout, there would be no surprises for anyone when working in to Waterloo. In this way, the potential scenario of a change of timetable detail/track layout, revised stock and crew diagrams, revised platform working, all commencing on the same day, was avoided, which hopefully aided a smoother transition in a small way.Or the timetable, and stock diagrams, will change in June.
Sounds more likely given it would be a massive chunk to do all at once.Or the timetable, and stock diagrams, will change in June.
At one time all the "mains" (except Shepperton and Kingston Loop) interworked. This was, I think, shortly after the chnages at Waterloo that allowed all platforms to take ten cars. I forget the sequence, but it included Hampton Court, Woking, Guildford via Cobham (back via Epsom), Chessington, Guilldford via Epsom (back via Cobham), and Dorking. This made the best use of the available platforms at Waterloo, but did mean that any problem on one branch quickly spread to all the others. The services have been thinned out now and less complex diagramming is possible.interesting, the chessi's interwork with the woking and guildford via cobhams. hampton courts interwork with the via epsom services (apart from sundays).
So 5+6 would either be done at the same time or are incorrect.
This was the case going back decades. It's all I ever knew since I joined in the 70's. It was designed to make best use of platform capacity at Waterloo, an acknowledged problem going back to the major rebuilds of 1884-1922, but also allowed the timetable planners to make best use of connectional opportunities at places such as Surbiton and also (perhaps?) a lesser extent Guildford/Woking in to/out of main (Fast) line services, and not forgetting such connections at the likes of Epsom as well.At one time all the "mains" (except Shepperton and Kingston Loop) interworked.
The latest issue of Modern Railways gives the current planned rollout programme:
1. Windsor
2. Weybridge / Hounslow loop
3. Kingston loop / Shepperton
4. Reading / Ascot - Farnham
5. Hampton Court / Chessington / Dorking
6. Woking / Guildford
Training expected to take 12-18 months.
12-18 months from the start of training, presumably?12-18 months from now?
I agree that seems more likely.12-18 months from the start of training, presumably?
Eh? If you mean the ongoing national pay dispute that has nothing to do with the 701 introduction.I agree that seems more likely.
Still a good few years off then - can't see any of the industrial relations issues being sorted prior to the general election.
Eh? If you mean the ongoing national pay dispute that has nothing to do with the 701 introduction.
Clearly, if training starts, say, next month and goes as planned then everything will be in service by late Summer next year.
They'd both have to watch it from a legal viewpoint. I assume training on new rolling stock is in drivers and guards job descriptions. You can't simply pick and choose what you do and don't do in your JD as part of any industrial action. You either withdraw your labour completely or refuse to undertake voluntary parts of your job (usually overtime). That's the very reason when people suggest that an effective way of taking action would be to leave ticket gates open it simply can't be done. It would be a clear breach of the employment contract with no legal protection.Well, it does and it doesn’t. It’ll likely mean less cooperation from ASLEF, and potentially RMT if they end up back in dispute.
Fingers crossed it gets resolved ASAP.