gabrielhj07
Established Member
They don’t sway as much as the BREL stuff but the ride isn’t bad.Does anyone know why the 701s appear to have worse ride quality than the other aventras?
They don’t sway as much as the BREL stuff but the ride isn’t bad.Does anyone know why the 701s appear to have worse ride quality than the other aventras?
Sway gives you a softer suspension but comes from an era where keeping absolutely within the kinematic envelope was less of a requirement. Now we want trains that maximises internal space but the penalty is stiff suspension so you don't infringe KE. Of course seats with a bit of give would help alleviate some of the harsh ride.They don’t sway as much as the BREL stuff but the ride isn’t bad.
The FLEXX-Eco bogie, which all Aventras use (hence all have the same ride quality) is billed as being 30% lighter than previous designs and also reduces track wear and damage.Sway gives you a softer suspension but comes from an era where keeping absolutely within the kinematic envelope was less of a requirement. Now we want trains that maximises internal space but the penalty is stiff suspension so you don't infringe KE. Of course seats with a bit of give would help alleviate some of the harsh ride.
I think you may be waiting for 'proper' weekday 701 diagrams before weekends happen.Any news on weekend 701 diagrams?
And we [the railway industry] also now have software that can model this.Sway gives you a softer suspension but comes from an era where keeping absolutely within the kinematic envelope was less of a requirement. Now we want trains that maximises internal space but the penalty is stiff suspension so you don't infringe KE.
Any news on when these “proper” diagrams will start to appear on the Windsor line?I think you may be waiting for 'proper' weekday 701 diagrams before weekends happen.
Groundhog day.No 1155 departure running today. The 1025 is diagrammed for 701043 again.
Does anyone know what 701(s) are going to Bicester today?https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:47589/2024-02-14/detailed#allox_id=0
Thank you69008 hauling 701521/701527 on 5Q75 today.
Hope that helps you.
Anyone know what services will have 701s tomorrow on the Windsor/Reading/Woking branch?
720s and 345s are AC, 710s are AC and DC. DC units tend to perform worse. The 345s are still 90mph units so I'm not convinced the gearing would make them that much faster.(0.7m/s^2 compared to 0.8m/s^2 on the 720s, 1m/s^2 on the 345s, and similar on the 710s)
SWR have stated that they are deliberately "go-anywhere" units, have been cleared across the entire electrified network and could in future be used on services beyond the suburban network.Why was 100mph chosen on these units?
SWR have stated that they are deliberately "go-anywhere" units, have been cleared across the entire electrified network and could in future be used on services beyond the suburban network.
To give the trains' owner the maximum residual value - a 100mph unit is going to have potential for re-leasing than an 80mph units.But it's valid question, why 100mph, and not say 85 or 90mph which would have kept time on about 99% of services across whole SWR network.
But it's valid question, why 100mph, and not say 85 or 90mph which would have kept time on about 99% of services across whole SWR network.
Yeah that's fair enough. Always forget how limited 750v DC is in that department.Comparing it to AC isn’t a level playing field.
Figure wise the 707 is supposed to be capable of 0.85m/s^2I’d say they are quicker off the blocks than a 707.
Agree. A 100mph train has to be more attractive than an 85 / 90mph equivalent in the resale market. Particularly where DfT are involved.Residual value for the lease company. 100mph is very useful elsewhere, given their AC compatibility (with some parts added).
That is a maximum acceleration rate, the acceleration rate is non linear and varies with speed (two separate V^2 components involved in the non-linearity). The shape of the whole curve across the relevant speed range is what matters not the gradient of the steepest bit of the curve alone and the aventra curves is slightly flatter than others so while the peak value may not be as high the average is better.Yeah that's fair enough. Always forget how limited 750v DC is in that department.
Figure wise the 707 is supposed to be capable of 0.85m/s^2
Not surprising - it's been nearly a month since it last had a run, so plenty of time to spruce it up after all those muddy feet last time.701037 looking very clean and tidy, and a sunny day.
Last time it was out it would have been salty soles due to the freezing weather at the time.Not surprising - it's been nearly a month since it last had a run, so plenty of time to spruce it up after all those muddy feet last time.
The move from Worksop day was 720138It looks like a class 701 will be delivered to Eastleigh tomorrow. Any idea what unit? https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:K00890/2024-02-15/detailed (loco only)
https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:K00463/2024-02-16/detailed (loco+701)
To be honest, I've always found the FLEXX-Eco to be a terrible riding bogie (though it doesn't knock as badly as the CAF version). The best of those lightweight ones are the Siemens version under the 700s. At least neither oscillate as badly as the Hitachi version though.The FLEXX-Eco bogie, which all Aventras use (hence all have the same ride quality) is billed as being 30% lighter than previous designs and also reduces track wear and damage.