bramling
Veteran Member
Having been in Stockholm more or less throughout the outbreak, where the response has been measured, I was convinced quite early on that some kind of mass hysteria was overtaking many societies - I looked on in total disbelief as people were ordered to stay at home in other countries.
One problem is that this has got countries with the worst hysteria, such as the UK, in a real tangle. Having messaged that people must stay at home, how are they going to give a contradictory message when there is another outbreak?
Because Sweden kept things such as bars, shops, restaurants, and of course schools, open throughout, it will of course be easy to do so again when there is another outbreak. In fact, Sweden is in the opposite situation - it would be seen as strange if things weren't kept open.
Having weathered this outbreak with a "controlled" spread through the population, it has also put the Swedish authorities in a reasonably good position. Because people's lives have not been disrupted so excessively, it is easier now for them to maintain the literally "big" restrictions - that is, on mass attended events, in place for as long as they see fit, because life and leisure has been able to proceed through the outbreak, and people are not mentally exhausted by the experience.
As it is, the deaths and hospitalisations continue to subside, despite the limited restrictions and people now being out and about much more, but that's another subject.
Whatever the rights or wrongs of the Swedish response, I just don’t think people here have the right mentality to have gone along with that approach with less margin for things going wrong due to our heavier population density.