LSWR Cavalier
Established Member
Perhaps 'undecided' could be another possible outcome, like 'not proven' in Scottish law
But before that, not for 20 years or something?Last weekend when they showed the T20 against Pakistan.
But before that, not for 20 years or something?
Are cricket writers and commentators missing the elephant in the room? Maybe the real reason why Australia collapsed so dramatically in the 2nd ODI at Old Trafford yesterday was having to bat at night. Had this been a red ball game, they would have been scurrying off for bad light between 6 and 7 pm.
Just to be a total and utter pedant, the BBC did manage an England v Scotland one day game from Scotland since 1999. Can't remember the year - but having one game I can barely call it "rights"!!On the BBC I think it was 1999 the last time they had the rights to broadcast cricket live. Last year's World Cup final (broadcast on Channel 4 as well as Sky) was perhaps slightly more momentous as it was the first time since 2005 that live cricket had been on free to air in the UK.
up to the 90s on Granada and Yorkshire when the Roses match was on.... ITV (yes, ITV!) showed cricket in the 70's with just two or three cameras!!!
T20 ODI match
Australia ... 325-5
New Zealand ... 93 all out
Now that is indeed a comprehensive T20 victory!!!
It was a comprehensive victory, but it was an ODI: ESPN Cricinfo Scorecard
I did head my posting T20 ODI match!!!
Bairstow's highest international T20 score, his previous was 68 against WI. Very nice.First International Twenty 20 Match
South Africa 179-6 (20 overs)
Du Plessis 58
Curran 3-28
England 183-5 (19.2 overs)
Bairstow 86 not out ... from 48 balls faced.
England win by 5 wickets.
I thought he'd just not run on that ball and wait for the 2 (or the boundary as you say)Comprehensive 3-0 victory for England in the T20 series in South Africa.
Next time Malan is on 98 with one run to win I expect he will try hit the ball to the boundary