Bletchleyite
Veteran Member
Wire the Marston Vale and they could pop over every night...


Wire the Marston Vale and they could pop over every night...
![]()
Your right about EMR being poorly managed. I know this debate has been done to death already, but spending millions on advertising a new 'mascot' seems counterintuitive when your 'state of the art' desiro fleet is achieving little over 50% reliability and you can't even afford to fix your train wash...I bellive that for maintenance EMR use Bedford for minor work and Northampton for heavier maintenance.
Most if the 360s stable overnight at Kettering or London where general cleaning and servicing can be done but very little maintenance.
I think this lack of a dedicated depot that the trains return to each night or at the least every few night's has a big impact on reliability. It may so be a factor that as neither depot is owned by EMR / is primarily dedicated to their services, perhaps their trains take a lower priority compared to the 'home' TOC?
It also doesn't help that EMR appears to be be poorly managed and unwilling to invest in the service. Standards have gone down across all the routes.
Its a shame Kettering did not have a depor built instead of just stabling sidings.
Considering Vivarail are in administration at present, maybe this could be a new use for 230s if they leave WMT. Chuck some Dellners on them and shove a bigger Turbo on their Ford Transit engines underneath and there you have itMaybe one of the D Trains could drag them over
As been said before though, different budgets for different purposes. With the DfT calling the shots at every turn, it wouldnt at all surprise me if the carriage wash repairs has to be signed off by Marsham Street, who likely in this climate, continually say no. As for Miles, as others have said, love him or loathe him, it seems to be doing reasonably well in creating conversation for the company - so in that sense it’s worked. And is probably a better amount of expenditure than GWRs New Nameplates for every Class 43 & 57, when the former are likely to entirely be gone by next year.Your right about EMR being poorly managed. I know this debate has been done to death already, but spending millions on advertising a new 'mascot' seems counterintuitive when your 'state of the art' desiro fleet is achieving little over 50% reliability and you can't even afford to fix your train wash...
Considering Vivarail are in administration at present, maybe this could be a new use for 230s if they leave WMT. Chuck some Dellners on them and shove a bigger Turbo on their Ford Transit engines underneath and there you have it![]()
As been said before though, different budgets for different purposes. With the DfT calling the shots at every turn, it wouldnt at all surprise me if the carriage wash repairs has to be signed off by Marsham Street, who likely in this climate, continually say no. As for Miles, as others have said, love him or loathe him, it seems to be doing reasonably well in creating conversation for the company - so in that sense it’s worked. And is probably a better amount of expenditure than GWRs New Nameplates for every Class 43 & 57, when the former are likely to entirely be gone by next year.
It amazes me how unreliable they are, considering the rest of the Desiros are some of, if not the most reliable trains on the whole network, being very well built. I think maintenance has a serious role to play, and I think it is thanks to operators like SWT/SWR with purpose built facilities run by Siemens like Northam that they achieve such good results. EMR is out of my knowledge and experience, but it makes me wonder what an earth has gone wrong with their maintenance for the reliability to have got this bad. IIRC they were not treated the best by GA in their final years there, but it still doesn't explain how EMR still haven't gotten to grips with the 360s, especially considering how solidly built they are.
That makes a lot of sense then, and probably explains a lot of the issues.Any problem with the train beneath the floor can only be fixed in Northampton.
The 360 Desiro's still have their original fluorescent lights in rather dated looking enclosures - these really need modernizing as part of the interior refurbishment
They won't be allowed to buy fluorescent tubes from next summer so either:Absolutely nothing wrong with them. You could fit LED tubes but these are often low quality.
They won't be allowed to buy fluorescent tubes from next summer so either:
- stock up now or
- swap to LED tubes or
- replace the fittings.
Indeed, I just realized that fluorescent bulbs, including CFL, are to be phased out from August 2023, so just like the other types of phased out bulbs, you can buy them, but not import more or produce more.They won't be allowed to buy fluorescent tubes from next summer so either:
- stock up now or
- swap to LED tubes or
- replace the fittings.
0756 and 0825 EMR connect services from Wellingborough to London were both cancelled this morning.Welp, I think we've hit an all time low here, as (according to the EMR website)
You are right about the junction speed and they should indeed go over at Wellingborough North. However you can't moan about EMR for that as I'm sure they would be ok with that , surely that's the signallers choice. It is sometimes done.Welp, I think we've hit an all time low here, as (according to the EMR website) all of the attached services have changes to on train facilities (i.e. they will be formed of 4 coaches instead of 8):
View attachment 124935
Truly awful in my opinion, the reliability of the Class 360s is what I would call "disgustingly shocking". I understand that they weren't treated the best when GA knew they would be getting new Class 720's, but the treatment of ALL EMR services has well and truly gone down the pan - the Meridian's are starting to feel tired and really unloved, the 360s had the 110mph modifications and nothing else, even though the only 110mph running they can do is between Bedford and Wellingborough (Wellingborough to Kettering is rated 110 down/120 up but only for HST permitted trains, whereas ALL EMU's can only run at 100mph south of Bedford), and the 360's are STILL awaiting their planned "refurbishment".
Other general oddities that I shall bring up:
The 222 Meridians are getting LED lights fitted - mostly to replace the GU10/MR16 halogens down the middle of the aisles - but no other love
The 360 Desiro's still have their original fluorescent lights in rather dated looking enclosures - these really need modernizing as part of the interior refurbishment
Going North, the 360s pull over to the Slow lines at Kettering South Junction - why?! Not only is the junction speed slower (30mph compared to the upgraded 50mph junction at Wellingborough North), but it also creates TWO sticky points/bottlenecks: if the 360 is more than 1 minute late departing Wellingborough, it WILL impact the following Sheffield service, with the latter catching up to the 360 as it leaves Wellingborough. But since the points at Kettering South are rated at just 30mph, the 360 has to slow down in plenty of time on the Fast lines, meaning that the following Sheffield (and possibly the Nottingham, which will be directly behind the Sheffield) will be impacted again by the 360.
Whereas, if the 360's were moved over at Wellingborough North, yes the 360s would be capped at 90mph instead, but they wouldn't have to slow down from 100mph to 30mph, and it would only affect the Sheffield once (and even then, probably not that much as the signal at Wellingborough station would clear from Red straight to Green when the 360 goes onto the Down Slow).
All in all, a lot of improvements to be made!
On RTT, they appear to be booked to cross at Kettering South rather than Wellingborough North. IIRC they used to be booked to cross at Wellingborough, so it's a planning decision either by EMR or NR. (or, very unlikely, an error.) https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/se...08/0000-2359?stp=WVS&show=passenger&order=wttYou are right about the junction speed and they should indeed go over at Wellingborough North. However you can't moan about EMR for that as I'm sure they would be ok with that , surely that's the signallers choice. It is sometimes done.
I have always assumed that pattern is to allow southbound 360s to cross over to the fasts earlier, at Kettering South, if needed. And vice versa, allowing operational flexibility in both directions without conflict.Going North, the 360s pull over to the Slow lines at Kettering South Junction - why?! Not only is the junction speed slower (30mph compared to the upgraded 50mph junction at Wellingborough North), but it also creates TWO sticky points/bottlenecks: if the 360 is more than 1 minute late departing Wellingborough, it WILL impact the following Sheffield service, with the latter catching up to the 360 as it leaves Wellingborough.
Welp, I think we've hit an all time low here, as (according to the EMR website) all of the attached services have changes to on train facilities (i.e. they will be formed of 4 coaches instead of 8):
View attachment 124935
Truly awful in my opinion, the reliability of the Class 360s is what I would call "disgustingly shocking". I understand that they weren't treated the best when GA knew they would be getting new Class 720's, but the treatment of ALL EMR services has well and truly gone down the pan - the Meridian's are starting to feel tired and really unloved, the 360s had the 110mph modifications and nothing else, even though the only 110mph running they can do is between Bedford and Wellingborough (Wellingborough to Kettering is rated 110 down/120 up but only for HST permitted trains, whereas ALL EMU's can only run at 100mph south of Bedford), and the 360's are STILL awaiting their planned "refurbishment".
Other general oddities that I shall bring up:
The 222 Meridians are getting LED lights fitted - mostly to replace the GU10/MR16 halogens down the middle of the aisles - but no other love
The 360 Desiro's still have their original fluorescent lights in rather dated looking enclosures - these really need modernizing as part of the interior refurbishment
Going North, the 360s pull over to the Slow lines at Kettering South Junction - why?! Not only is the junction speed slower (30mph compared to the upgraded 50mph junction at Wellingborough North), but it also creates TWO sticky points/bottlenecks: if the 360 is more than 1 minute late departing Wellingborough, it WILL impact the following Sheffield service, with the latter catching up to the 360 as it leaves Wellingborough. But since the points at Kettering South are rated at just 30mph, the 360 has to slow down in plenty of time on the Fast lines, meaning that the following Sheffield (and possibly the Nottingham, which will be directly behind the Sheffield) will be impacted again by the 360.
Whereas, if the 360's were moved over at Wellingborough North, yes the 360s would be capped at 90mph instead, but they wouldn't have to slow down from 100mph to 30mph, and it would only affect the Sheffield once (and even then, probably not that much as the signal at Wellingborough station would clear from Red straight to Green when the 360 goes onto the Down Slow).
All in all, a lot of improvements to be made!
You are right about the junction speed and they should indeed go over at Wellingborough North. However you can't moan about EMR for that as I'm sure they would be ok with that , surely that's the signallers choice. It is sometimes done.
On RTT, they appear to be booked to cross at Kettering South rather than Wellingborough North. IIRC they used to be booked to cross at Wellingborough, so it's a planning decision either by EMR or NR. (or, very unlikely, an error.) https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/se...08/0000-2359?stp=WVS&show=passenger&order=wtt
I imagine part of it is down to the Nottingham - London service passes Wellingborough a couple of minutes after the Corby services depart. So by crossing at Kettering south has more 'room' in the timetable.I have always assumed that pattern is to allow southbound 360s to cross over to the fasts earlier, at Kettering South, if needed. And vice versa, allowing operational flexibility in both directions without conflict.
Which means that if a northbound 360 is going to hold up a following service, then the signallers would ideally take the option of crossing it over earlier, to get out of the way. But obviously they don't always do that.
Welp, I think we've hit an all time low here, as (according to the EMR website) all of the attached services have changes to on train facilities (i.e. they will be formed of 4 coaches instead of 8):
The class 317s were absolutely battered by the end, but they carried on with minimal fuss, covering all their own diagrams and several more as well. Four of them were parked at Harwich for months. One pair famously ran empty direct to Liverpool Street to work the 10:28 to Cambridge. No doubt a fitter gave them a once over, but they won't have had any serious work done on them at Harwich before returning to service.IIRC they were not treated the best by GA in their final years there, but it still doesn't explain how EMR still haven't gotten to grips with the 360s, especially considering how solidly built they are.
The 360s are likely a lot more needy in the maintenance aspect I would imagine regarding their more complex systems and TMS. It is still amazing that the 317s went on for so long so reliably considering they were circa 40 years old as you say, whilst the 360s are half that age and can barely manage 50% reliability.The class 317s were absolutely battered by the end, but they carried on with minimal fuss, covering all their own diagrams and several more as well. Four of them were parked at Harwich for months. One pair famously ran empty direct to Liverpool Street to work the 10:28 to Cambridge. No doubt a fitter gave them a once over, but they won't have had any serious work done on them at Harwich before returning to service.
The 360s are likely a lot more needy in the maintenance aspect I would imagine regarding their more complex systems and TMS. It is still amazing that the 317s went on for so long so reliably considering they were circa 40 years old as you say, whilst the 360s are half that age and can barely manage 50% reliability.
I have my suspicions that the real problem isn’t so much the 360s, but the way the maintenance is arranged. Outstabling at Cricklewood and Kettering, a minor depot built for a completely different purpose and positioned at a location where not one single service starts or finishes from, and a major depot not even on the route. My suspicion is that the trains simply aren’t able to be brought to depot as readily as they need to be.
But presumably still no suggestion the Marston Vale be wired to allow rotation through King's Heath? Even a 47 being left at Bedford overnight if needed?no need to be suspicious, it’s fact!
Going North, the 360s pull over to the Slow lines at Kettering South Junction - why?! Not only is the junction speed slower (30mph compared to the upgraded 50mph junction at Wellingborough North), but it also creates TWO sticky points/bottlenecks: if the 360 is more than 1 minute late departing Wellingborough, it WILL impact the following Sheffield service, with the latter catching up to the 360 as it leaves Wellingborough. But since the points at Kettering South are rated at just 30mph, the 360 has to slow down in plenty of time on the Fast lines, meaning that the following Sheffield (and possibly the Nottingham, which will be directly behind the Sheffield) will be impacted again by the 360.
Worth pointing out that before the 2tph from Corby, the intermediate stations received 1tph from Corby and 1 tph from Nottingham, usually formed of a 5 car Meridian.
The seating capacity of a 5 car 222 is 50 1st class, 192 standard compared this to the 360s (albeit as 3+2 currently) 16 1st class and 264 standard class.
Given that the trains coming from Corby will be much more lightly loaded than those from Nottingham / Leicester - even with the shorter formations, the likelihood of getting a seat, even with a 4 car 360 is much better than it would be on a 5 car 222.
no need to be suspicious, it’s fact!
no need to be suspicious, it’s fact!
That's still one long old run to get the units seen to.Let’s hope that once electrification reaches Nottingham and Derby EMR can have their own EMU depot to service the Corby units and any other electric / battery electric units they have to take advantage of more electrification.
Better than dragging them half way across the country to Northampton…That's still one long old run to get the units seen to.