If "Enforced Travel" does happen maybe all those Manchester United and Liverpool Fans will start supporting their local team...
If they were udnertaking racist chanting (which i doubt) then why did you not report it to the gaurd and then the BTP? If they were commting a crime they would be arrested.
If you are not prepapred to confront problems how do you expect them to be dealt with?
Would you walk past a crime happening on the street? If it is such a problem then us law abiding citizens have to confront the issue.
As i said i often travel to games by train. If i feel someone has overstepped the mark i tell them.
Their chant went 'Gary Neville is a red, is a red, is a red. Gary Neville is a red, We hate Scousers' which was shouted multiple times. I didn't find it particularly pleasant. (It may not be against a particular race but it is against a group of people from a particular place)
Also, one of their fans tried to stand up to the rest saying that others may find what they are staying offensive, but there was almost a fight, so I don't think it would have been wise for me to tackle them.
Finally, two different conductors (before and after Birmingham) walked through the carriage and most probably heard their chanting (although I can't guarantee this) yet tried to be friendly with them as they didn't want to cause trouble.
And WelshBluebird, maybe the football fans were having a 'good time' in their eyes rather than meaning any harm, but it was downright selfish and inconsiderate and people having a 'good time' should ideally not impinge greatly on others having a 'good time'.
I think you will find, for accuracy that the chant actually went 'Gary Neville is a red, is a red, is a red. Gary Neville is a red, He hates Scousers' (and no, I am no Man U fan which that lot were!).
"And WelshBluebird, maybe the football fans were having a 'good time' in their eyes rather than meaning any harm, but it was downright selfish and inconsiderate and people having a 'good time' should ideally not impinge greatly on others having a 'good time'." Agreed, but hardly unique to football fans is it. Try rugby fans singing "Sweet Chariot", hen and stag parties, race-goers, train spotters and lots of others already mentioned....
Their chant went 'Gary Neville is a red, is a red, is a red. Gary Neville is a red, We hate Scousers' which was shouted multiple times. I didn't find it particularly pleasant. (It may not be against a particular race but it is against a group of people from a particular place)
And WelshBluebird, maybe the football fans were having a 'good time' in their eyes rather than meaning any harm, but it was downright selfish and inconsiderate and people having a 'good time' should ideally not impinge greatly on others having a 'good time'.
As I said, somehow I doubt you would feel the same if they had been oh so innocent Rugby fans, or a stag / hen party, or people who had been to a concert and were singing songs loudly, or just drunk people in general.
Their chant went 'Gary Neville is a red, is a red, is a red. Gary Neville is a red, We hate Scousers' which was shouted multiple times. I didn't find it particularly pleasant. (It may not be against a particular race but it is against a group of people from a particular place)
If I ever have the pleasure of a 3 hour journey with a carriage full of one of the groups of people you have named, I will be sure to tell you how my journey was. I had an unpleasant journey because of football fans. They may be no worse than other groups but that doesn't excuse them.
Funnily enough, in my experience, the most troublesome fans I have to deal with are those in the 40-60 age group (who will have 10-15 year old kids with them, in a surprising number of cases). That would tie into being the ones who were of an age to have participated in the worst of the trouble.
Old habits die hard?
Anybody have any comments on that?
That'll be me then, thanks. :-x
If the cap fits...
Seriously, not all fans are trouble, but the ones that ARE trouble in my experience are usually aged 40-60.
BestWestern - Do you believe that because a tiny minority of UK based Muslim's openly support Al-Qaeda then we should condemn all Muslims as terrorists and send them all the prison to protect the country from terror attacks?
Now you probably realise how stupid your comments sound.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I also find the "Enforced Travel arrangement" thing laughable and it simply is not workable anyway.
Where do you end it? Hell, i've had much more heated discussions with people who are trainspotting and tresspassing on railways then I have with opposing football fans! Should we ban all spotters because of a minority who don't stick to the rules and give everyone else a bad name?
What if we were to flip that round and suggest that because some guards sell wrong tickets or tell people tickets are not valid when they are then all guards are useless and shouldn't be working as a guard. I guess you, as a decent guard, would be all over that one telling us just because a few guards are like that we shouldn't tar everyone with the same brush
Or indeed that because most months there will be a SPAD somewhere all Drivers are incompetent and we should go ATO as a matter of priority?? Careful... :roll:
Selling somebody the wrong ticket is hardly causing widespread grief to large numbers of other people now, is it?! Not quite the same.
As I wrote in a post several pages back, this is particularly the case when a crowd is involved> Even a crowd of happy people can be very intimidating..... Many people misunderstand boisterousness for aggression. .....
Yes, it would be great to have enough police about to storm on board and eject all those who can't sit down ....
Funnily enough, in my experience, the most troublesome fans I have to deal with are those in the 40-60 age group (who will have 10-15 year old kids with them, in a surprising number of cases). That would tie into being the ones who were of an age to have participated in the worst of the trouble.
Old habits die hard?
Anybody have any comments on that?
Usual UK reporting it seems, why let the truth get in the way of a good story.Anyone reading that article would have been left in no doubt that a severe bottle fight had taken place, and poor but plucky railway staff who were only trying to keep order had received all manner of injuries.
Nothing could have been further from the truth.
I'm sorry, but the onus really is with football fans in general to change their ways. When it stops being such a troubling issue, then perhaps attitudes towards them will change accordingly. Over to you...
What you have shown is that only a very small number of "fans" do anything that warrants a banning order (or are caught). However, to a non-fan, the general behaviour of the overall crowd can be intimidating; Leeds station after a match is full of noisy, aggressive "majority" fans, and the atmosphere is unnerving whether their team has won or lost. And yes, they ARE aggressive, because that is the nature of a huge crowd acting in unison - even a crowd of knitting vicars would be intimidating in those numbers. The same is true at Manchester Piccadilly, New Street, Oxford, Luton, Newcastle - everywhere I have happened to coincide with football crowds they have been intimidating. And this appears to be something that those who take part - normal fans - do not seem to realise.....
When it starts being such a troubling issue, let me know and we'll talk again. Back to you...
Indeed, and not all of those arrested (who will normally get a FBO as a matter of course) will be charged, and not all of those charged will be found guilty. Even those not found guilty will often not have the FBO rescinded, which to me seems unfair.What you have shown is that only a very small number of "fans" do anything that warrants a banning order (or are caught).
Are they really all aggressive? I've been to Elland Road a few times, and although they can be surly, I've barely seen any aggression at all.However, to a non-fan, the general behaviour of the overall crowd can be intimidating; Leeds station after a match is full of noisy, aggressive "majority" fans, and the atmosphere is unnerving whether their team has won or lost.
Disagree - the nature of a crowd provides safety in numbers and solidarity, and sometimes a herd mentality which may, but not always, be perceived as aggressive. Very occasionally this will escalate, but as the figures show this is extremely rare. I could go on about the way that football supporters are policed, and the way that the media hype things up, but that's another story.And yes, they ARE aggressive, because that is the nature of a huge crowd acting in unison
So therefore it's not football, but crowds in general? Mind you, those knitting vicars...- even a crowd of knitting vicars would be intimidating in those numbers.
Yes, I do believe it is a crowd rather than a football thing. However, football crowds are (I would guess) the most frequent, and probably the largest (political demonstrations apart!). I suspect if those knitting vicars got together more often, people would be leery about them more.....So therefore it's not football, but crowds in general? .....
What you have shown is that only a very small number of "fans" do anything that warrants a banning order (or are caught). However, to a non-fan, the general behaviour of the overall crowd can be intimidating; Leeds station after a match is full of noisy, aggressive "majority" fans, and the atmosphere is unnerving whether their team has won or lost. And yes, they ARE aggressive, because that is the nature of a huge crowd acting in unison - even a crowd of knitting vicars would be intimidating in those numbers. The same is true at Manchester Piccadilly, New Street, Oxford, Luton, Newcastle - everywhere I have happened to coincide with football crowds they have been intimidating. And this appears to be something that those who take part - normal fans - do not seem to realise.