Along the bay
Member
- Joined
- 2 Sep 2018
- Messages
- 98
Bangor - Caernarfon would be a personal pick.
Bangor - Caernarfon would be a personal pick.
I was waiting for someone to suggest this. After the initial closure, much of the line to Uckfield was singled in the 90s due to it being in a really sorry state. There's been a lot of "umm"ing and "aah"ing over what to do with it, because it's one of only a few lines down South that isn't yet electrified and the line could really use some kind of improvement. There are a few caveats, though, such as, what to do with land between Uckfield and Lewes that has been sold-off or land-grabbed in the time since the line was closed, and you'd almost definitely need a few level crossings to be installed - in particular, having one at Uckfield High Street would be noticeable disruptive to local traffic.To be honest, for me, it would be the missing chunk between Lewes and Uckfield. Providing another route to London (from Lewes) when the BML is closed for whatever reason.
Using the old junction on the line towards Cooksbridge. Around the Hamsey Area.
I was waiting for someone to suggest this. After the initial closure, much of the line to Uckfield was singled in the 90s due to it being in a really sorry state. There's been a lot of "umm"ing and "aah"ing over what to do with it, because it's one of only a few lines down South that isn't yet electrified and the line could really use some kind of improvement. There are a few caveats, though, such as, what to do with land between Uckfield and Lewes that has been sold-off or land-grabbed in the time since the line was closed, and you'd almost definitely need a few level crossings to be installed - in particular, having one at Uckfield High Street would be noticeable disruptive to local traffic.
I'd love to see the line benefit from some kind of improvement. Having just an hourly service to London Bridge that gets cancelled at the drop of a hat isn't really a service that you can rely on. Plenty of locals would rather travel to Haywards Heath or Tunbridge Wells, where the service is both more frequent and more reliable.
Was Shap at risk of losing its bus service a few years ago ? And now only has one or two buses a day ? A station there would make a useful point for commencing walks through the Eastern Lakes and towards the Dales.Perhaps Boris has an eye on retaining those seats he won from Labour in the North, and what better way than to reward them with reinstated passenger railways? I'm a local councillor for Shap so I'd be very interested in his plans to reopen closed stations on existing passenger lines.
A few walkers and a population of 1200 are unlikely to make a business case.Was Shap at risk of losing its bus service a few years ago ? And now only has one or two buses a day ? A station there would make a useful point for commencing walks through the Eastern Lakes and towards the Dales.
for a mainline service ,yes,A few walkers and a population of 1200 are unlikely to make a business case.
Trains stopping at Shap wouldn't do much for journey times on WCML. Bear in mind many already skip-stop Penrith or Oxenholme.
for a mainline service ,yes,
with a bit of clever marketing and the metals in place, something like a lakeland rover might work.
the old penrith-keswick etc...
if you have a lot of ramblers(the lakes do), and hotels/ b+b's close to nice rambling routes AND station, then you could potentially do one of julia bradbury's "wordsworth walks"
I think there would be quite a substantial market for that if the stuff and amenities are in suitable locations.
PS you do have to bear in mind such footfall is EXTREMELY seasonal,much like coastal resorts. You need a backup series of events from oct-mar.
If Snap got reopens it could strengthen the case for having Carnforth's platforms reinstated. Realistically Snap isn't going to be served by the Glasgow Express trains but could be a case for other stopping services.
Having said that it is difficult to see which services would want a couple of extra stops, seeing as TPE to Scotland is trying to be a little more Intercity.
I'd suggest that anywhere with such low traffic potential that its bus service is under threat of withdrawal is definitely not a priority for having any kind of rail service reinstated.If there was a priority list for reopening (and various ones have been produced over the years) Shap would not be in the top 200. 2000?
I'd suggest that anywhere with such low traffic potential that its bus service is under threat of withdrawal is definitely not a priority for having any kind of rail service reinstated.
An exciting announcement from the Department for Transport today, committing £500m of funding to kickstart the reopening of rail routes closed decades ago. More information using the link at the bottom of this post.
In December, Rail Minister Chris Heaton Harris MP visited Stocksbridge and announced that the Stocksbridge to Sheffield line is one of the routes that the Government would like to see re-opened. This offers us a real opportunity to improve transport connections for our community.
Last week I met with representatives from Sheffield City Region and the Don Valley Railway to look at possible sites for a passenger train station in Stocksbridge. At the moment, a freight train travels from Stocksbridge to Sheffield twice a day along what used to be a passenger line. The Don Valley Railway group have been campaigning for over ten years to see this line re-instated as a passenger service and I am delighted that the Government is committed to funding projects like these.
The A6102 between Stocksbridge and Sheffield is a busy road, and frequent users will know that traffic congestion and air quality in Hillsborough are significant issues for those coming into the North of Sheffield. With more housing being built and planned for the Upper Don Valley, congestion will only increase. If we are going to connect our communities with jobs, training and services, and reduce our use of fossil fuels, we have to find viable alternatives to private cars. This a fantastic opportunity to do just that and I’m looking forward to working with the Department for Transport and Sheffield City Region to deliver it.
For example, Tavistock has four commercial buses per hour to Plymouth, that's a clear market, that's a good enough distance for train travel to be competitive, that's a clear case of "commuter town and nearest big city" that works well for heavy rail - Tavistock ought to be relatively high up a list of future re-openings (it's just that it always seems to get weaved in with the obsession that others have about a Waterloo - Okehampton - Plymouth service - I think that a short stub to Tavistock would work perfectly well on its own but people aren't campaigning for that in sufficient number because they want a nice big juicy line through the middle of nowhere under the pretext of Dawlish).
.
In your deams!
At some point trams on the Windermere branch will need servicing and maintenance. Where will they go and how will they get there at 50mph top speed on dc when the main line is 100mph+ on ac? It just disintegrates the system even more.
Sometime in the future I would like to think charters could access Windermere.
Not sure about your 'just', but I agree in principle the old alignments shouldn't be thought of as easy, although often they're the obvious and sometimes only possible routes, particularly in hilly territory and through towns. Often it's just a few places where land is obstructed by significant new development, usually around old station sites etc in town and village centres. That makes things complex because viable ways around the obstructions can sometimes take the route far away from the particular settlement which can defeat the point of reopening in the first place. Through rural fields between towns, old alignments are mostly clear of development but earthworks, structures, and drainage, having not been maintained for over half a century, usually require complete reconstruction to be servicable.Once land has been sold that route is so better than any other.
So reopening becomes no better than just laying out a brand new, modern route.
So this proposal is about one existing line being put back into passenger service and the only closed line in England not to have been built on or converted into a bypass because it did actually carry freight up to a few years ago
The whole point of the "Beeching cuts" was to release railway lines for conversion into roads thus enabling Ernest Marples business interests to prosper. In reality it was councils and other interests who saw an opportunity to grab prime development land except in Scotland
Just about every line closed was destroyed with indecent haste so you simply cannot reverse the closures and I believe one of the preferred options for the Fleetwood line is to add it to the existing tram network
I think this is part of BOJO's charm offensive to make sure that Labour can never reestablish themselves soundbites with the promise of a limited budget
It would be nice to see it happen but whilst the Blythe and Tyne line might be possible can't see the funding for Fleetwood happening
There are a few proposals around the place that have reasonably intact trackbeds. Tavistock and Wisbech spring to mind. Portishead is also one which ought to be finished.