No I think it is planned to use calibrated volunteers rather than weightsThanks @Woods. One question if I may. When you say “loading”, will there be weights added to represent a fully laden train, or have I misunderstood?

No I think it is planned to use calibrated volunteers rather than weightsThanks @Woods. One question if I may. When you say “loading”, will there be weights added to represent a fully laden train, or have I misunderstood?
Ah, I see. Thanks for the clarification.No I think it is planned to use calibrated volunteers rather than weights(I'm being serious about the volunteers, less so about the calibration!)
It's very handy having a set of ballast weights that can move themselves into and out of position!No I think it is planned to use calibrated volunteers rather than weights(I'm being serious about the volunteers, less so about the calibration!)
This is very true!It's very handy having a set of ballast weights that can move themselves into and out of position!![]()
Services currently suspended between West Ealing and Greenford due to a broken down train. Is this the 230 or a failed Turbo?
I didn't think they were doing any 230 test running on Mondays?Services currently suspended between West Ealing and Greenford due to a broken down train. Is this the 230 or a failed Turbo?
They're not. It's a failed Turbo.I didn't think they were doing any 230 test running on Mondays?
Thanks for the info.165120 has engine issues.
No idea - I'd just seen there was a broken down train and was curiousI didn't think they were doing any 230 test running on Mondays?
How is the testing going, if you can say?They're not. It's a failed Turbo.
Very well so far. So much so that there is a plan being formulated to do a full day's running on the Greenford branch on Sunday week (30th June), from 0800 to 2230, to push the unit a bit further.How is the testing going, if you can say?
230001 and the charging system will be put through its paces this coming Sunday 30th June when it will be emulating (almost) a full day of passenger service. Except without passengers. But nonetheless, it will be 28 round trips from West Ealing to Greenford and back (the normal service is 31), first one arriving Greenford at 08:37, last one departing Greenford at 22:17. The aim is principally to monitor the performance of the trackside battery banks.
Guessing at least four but maybe six of seven. Each driver will need a pnb somewhere within two hours of the midpoint of their diagram.How many drivers are involved in that?
Have the current tests not be run by RailAdventure (Or at least the paths are theirs). In my opinion GWR would be unwise to take staff away from services when they are currently facing significant disruption from staff shortages.Guessing at least four but maybe six of seven. Each driver will need a pnb somewhere within two hours of the midpoint of their diagram.
Only three drivers, all from Rail Adventure. Taking turns during the day, allowing for PNBs.Guessing at least four but maybe six of seven. Each driver will need a pnb somewhere within two hours of the midpoint of their diagram.
Ahhh. OK. So it is nowhere near carrying pax yet then.They won’t be GWR drivers (possibly a manager or two) - no ordinary GWR drivers sign the 230 yet.
Probably because no-one has got round to changing it. There may be regulatory hoops to go through to introduce a new class. I understand that is why the re-engined class 73s didn't get a new classification (although most of them will rarely, if ever, operate off the live rail again). Normally such a drastic re-engineering would have done so (see classes 21/29, 30/31, 47/57, or 56/69).Does anyone know why 230001 is still using a class number applicable to Diesel electric traction? I know it’s a test unit at this stage, but if the trial is successful will the future permanent stock get a new number?
Training of GWR drivers is planned to start in September to avoid the peak summer leave period.Ahhh. OK. So it is nowhere near carrying pax yet then.
Thanks
No doubt when computers were far less widespread it was much more important to have such differences immediately apparent on the loco / associated paperwork.. Normally such a drastic re-engineering would have done so (see classes 21/29, 30/31, 47/57, or 56/69)
Even quite minor engine variants used to mean a new class - see classes 08/10, 24/25, 26/27, 44/45, or 47/48.
I've just put another video of 230001 in the Photography forum if anyone would like to have a look (you'll have to scroll down a bit to find it):
Fast Charge Battery-Electric Train Trial
This is currently (June 2024) underway in west London It uses 230 001 - a former London Underground D stock train. To simulate a real-world application this test train shadows the West Ealing - Greenford diesel passenger service, stopping at stations etc but it is not carrying passengers.www.railforums.co.uk
Sorry, meant when it is not on trials
Is anyone able to help me with the location of 230001, when is on trials on the Greenford-West Ealing branch. Many thanks in advance.
Sorry, meant when it is not on trials
Is anyone able to help me with the location of 230001, when is on trials on the Greenford-West Ealing branch. Many thanks in advance.
It’s been sat at Reading Traincare recently, or at least was up to Saturday.Is anyone able to help me with the location of 230001, when is on trials on the Greenford-West Ealing branch. Many thanks in advance.